Infomation market place... A place where knowledge is power... where the brain thrives..

Saturday, May 31, 2008

GeoPedia - The Research Behind The Stories: Snow Leopards

Snow Leopards of Central Asia


Photograph by: Steve Winter, National Geographic June 2008

The snow leopard, uncia uncia, lives a solitary life in remote areas of 12 Central Asian countries. It has a beautiful spotted coat considered desirable by trophy hunters, who may travel a long way for the chance to track and kill the rare cat. Many livestock herders who live inside the species' range consider the snow leopard a pest—not unlike a wolf, though if they manage to trap, shoot, or poison a cat that's preying on their flocks, they can sell the pelt illegally for a veritable fortune. These and other threats, such as the loss of wild prey to hunters and the loss of prime habitat to human encroachment, have shrunk the snow leopard population—estimates of the number still living in the wild run as low as 3,500. Writer Douglas Chadwick traveled around India and Mongolia trying to catch a glimpse of a snow leopard. Photographer Steve Winter also went to those countries and to Pakistan, setting up many remote camera traps that captured photos of snow leopards when they came out of the shadows.

Bibliography
Chadwick, Douglas H. "Out of the Shadows." National Geographic (June 2008), 106-129.

Other Resources
"Snow Leopard: Principal Threats." IUCN-World Conservation Union. Species Survival Commission, Cat Specialist Group.

Theile, Stephanie. Fading Footprints: The Killing and Trade of Snow Leopards. TRAFFIC International, 2003.

>>>>

Snow Leopards Captured on Film

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:43:46 AM

Nearly four decades ago George Schaller of the New York Zoological Society patiently roamed the craggy mountains of Pakistan's Chitral Valley, following tracks in the snow, searching for the legendary, beautiful, and elusive snow leopard. He spent many hours contemplating and recording the cat's behavior. His photographs of snow leopards—the first images of them in the wild—ran in an article titled "Imperiled Phantom of Asian Peaks" in National Geographic’s November 1971 issue. Schaller later published his images in a book called Stones of Silence.

Fifteen years later, wildlife conservationist Rodney Jackson set up camera traps high in the peaks of Nepal and captured thrillingly candid portraits of snow leopards for his June 1986 National Geographic cover story, written with Darla Hillard. Another first was the bite Jackson received while successfully collaring five of the cats during a four-year NG-sponsored radio-tracking study. His bandaged hand can be seen in a photograph in the article.

Bibliography
Chadwick, Douglas H. "Out of the Shadows." National Geographic (June 2008), 106-129.

Other Resources
Schaller, George B. "Imperiled Phantom of Asian Peaks." National Geographic (November 1971), 702-707.

Jackson, Rodney, and Darla Hillard. "Tracking the Elusive Snow Leopard." National Geographic (June 1986), 793-812.

>>>>

Snow Leopards Thrive in Zoos Around the World

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:45:20 AM

Work is being done in communities within the snow leopard's natural range to offset the many threats to the decreasing wild population. Groups such as the Snow Leopard Conservancy and the Snow Leopard Trust have started education and insurance programs designed to help local people value this wild animal. Outside of the cat's natural range, these and other organizations work to conserve the global population through captive-breeding programs.

In 1903 the New York Zoological Society's Bronx Zoo became the first zoo in the Western Hemisphere to exhibit a snow leopard. The breeding program developed there has produced about 80 cubs, many of which have been sent to other zoos in North America and in several other countries.

The newest wild-born snow leopard at the Bronx Zoo—now operated by the Wildlife Conservation Society—was found orphaned in the Naltar Valley of Pakistan in July 2005. In a major diplomatic operation, the State Department, working with several wildlife conservation organizations, helped relocate the cub to the U.S. Since making his debut in the Himalayan Highlands section of the Bronx Zoo on September 25, 2007, the cub, named Leo, has led an active life, playing on a rocky hillside and supplementing his diet by hunting small animals that wander into the exhibition space.

When Leo is old enough to breed—three to four years old—his genes
will help strengthen the already genetically robust North American captive-breeding program. He will live in New York until he returns to his home valley in Pakistan, where another captive-breeding facility is to be built. In the meantime, Patrick Thomas, Bronx Zoo curator of mammals, says, "Leo is a perfect example of being an ambassador for his wild counterparts."

Bibliography
Elder, Scott. "Snow Leopard Rescue." NG Kids (December 2007/January 2008), 27-29.

Martin, Cecelia. "Bronx Zoo Provides New Home for Pakistani Snow Leopard." Washington File, August 8, 2006.

Search for "education" and "empowering villagers." Snow Leopard Conservancy.

Search for "community-based conservation" and "snow leopard conservation timeline." Snow Leopard Trust.

"Snow Leopard Orphan Gets a Fresh Start at the Bronx Zoo." Wildlife Conservation Society, August 10, 2007.

"Brief History of the Bronx Zoo." Wildlife Conservation Society.

>>>>

Snow Leopard Trust Founder Helen Freeman

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:46:00 AM

Breeding management is an important part of building a captive snow leopard population. The Woodland Park Zoo in Seattle, Washington, which has had snow leopards since 1972, was among the first zoos in the United States to set up a breeding program.

Helen Freeman, the zoo's education curator, played a vital role in building the captive population. In 1981 she founded the International Snow Leopard Trust; she also helped establish the Snow Leopard Species Survival Plan (SSP) for the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA).

Freeman was the first snow leopard studbook keeper for the AZA's cooperative breeding program, which manages the entire North American snow leopard gene pool. A genetically diverse population is essential to the species' long-term survival. At Woodland Park, Freeman created a self-sustaining population—the zoo no longer needs to bring in snow leopards from the wild.

Since her death in 2007, Freeman has been remembered for working tirelessly to establish community-based programs in Central Asian countries that benefit snow leopard populations and local people. This Snow Leopard Trust anniversary video shows Freeman discussing her vision.

Bibliography
"Species Survival Plan Program." Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Marren, Peter. "Helen Freeman: Conservationist Who Worked to Save the Snow Leopard." Independent, October 6, 2007.


Other Resources
Jackson, Rodney M., and others. Surveying Snow Leopard Populations With Emphasis on Camera Trapping: A Handbook. Snow Leopard Conservancy, 2005.

McCarthy, Thomas M., and Guillame Chapron, eds. Snow Leopard Survival Strategy. International Snow Leopard Trust and Snow Leopard Network, 2003.

Schaller, George B. Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. University of Chicago, 1998.

Sunquist, Fiona, and Mel Sunquist. Wild Cats of the World. University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Last updated: April 17, 2008


How To Help - Save The Cats

Covering traditional stone corrals with chain-link fencing protects Himalayan herders' livestock from snow leopards. It also protects snow leopards from the herders themselves. Minimizing livestock losses cuts down on revenge killings of the big cats. Says Darla Hillard of the Snow Leopard Conservancy, which helps fund the predator-proofing, "Our basic approach is to turn the snow leopard from being seen as a pest into a valued asset, worth more alive than dead." The following groups work with Central Asian communities to help both the people who live there and the cats.

Snow Leopard Conservancy forms partnerships with in-country groups to foster stewardship of snow leopards and their habitat. Efforts include camera traps and tracking with GPS units as well as programs to benefit local people, such as himalayan-homestays.com. For more information, go to snowleopardconservancy.org.

Snow Leopard Trust offers an array of conservation programs in five different countries: livestock vaccinations in Pakistan, livestock insurance in India, ecotourism in Kyrgyzstan, and more. Crafts made by Mongolian herder families can be purchased from the trust's Snow Leopard Enterprises at snowleopard.org/shop.

Out of the Shadows - The elusive Central Asian snow leopard steps into a risk-filled future

Snow Leopards

Snow Leopard walking

When a snow leopard stalks prey among the mountain walls, it moves on broad paws with extra fur between the toes, softly, slowly, "like snow slipping off a ledge as it melts," Raghu says.

"You almost have to turn away for a minute to tell the animal is going anywhere. If it knocks a stone loose, it will reach out a foot to stop it from falling and making noise." One might be moving right now, perfectly silent and perfectly tensed, maybe close by. But where? That's always the question. That, and how many are left to see?

Raghunandan Singh Chundawat has watched snow leopards as often as anyone alive. The New Delhi biologist studied them closely for five years in Hemis High Altitude National Park in Ladakh, the largest, loftiest district of northern India, and carried out wildlife surveys in the region over nine additional years. We're in the 1,300-square-mile park this evening, setting up camp in a deeply cleft canyon near 12,000 feet. It's June, and the blue sheep have new lambs.

We keep one eye on a group crossing a scree slope, the other eye on the cliffs at its top. Leopards are ambush hunters that like to attack from above. While the common leopard of Asia and Africa relies on branches and leaves for concealment, the snow leopard loses itself among steep jumbles of stone. This is exactly the kind of setting one would favor. But I'm not holding my breath. Raghu has sighted only a few dozen in his whole career.

Lengthening shadows coalesce into dusk. Wild roses perfume the Himalayan canyon as passing squalls brush the ridgetops with new snow. I imagine a leopard easing down the darkened slopes. It flows low to the ground, with huge gold eyes and a coat the color of dappled moonlight on frost. The body stretches four feet from nose to rump. Its tail, the most striking in the feline family, is almost as long, and so thick and mobile it looks as if the cat is being followed by a fuzzy python. The snow leopard sometimes uses its tail to send signals during social encounters or to wrap partway around itself like a scarf when bedded down in bitter weather. But the main function of this plume is to add balance in an environment with thousand-foot drops.

In Mongolia a park ranger once told me he'd seen snow leopards crouch and sway that plume in the air to lure curious marmots closer, just as hunters do with white rags. Possible. But I heard a simpler explanation from Sodnomdeleg Bazarhuyag, a retired doctor in a community of herders in northwestern Mongolia. We went to search out snow leopard sign in a gorge glistening with river ice. When a band of scimitarhorned wild goats (ibex) appeared on the skyline, Bazarhuyag scanned carefully around them, saying, "Snow leopards are good at hiding, but sometimes they forget about their tail."



-
By Douglas H. Chadwick
Photograph by Steve Winter

Send Me to Siberia - Oil transforms a Russian outpost

Frozen Assets

Siberian Oil Boom

It's around midnight, and the couples on the dance floor at the Palace Restaurant are gently swaying to a slow one. "Za nas, za neft—To us, to oil," the singer croons,

Wherever life sends us,
To us, to oil …
We fill our glasses to the brim.

It is Oilers' Day in the western Siberian province of Khanty-Mansi. This annual holiday, honoring the hard labor of the oil workers, the neftyaniki, falls early in September, after the worst of the summer mosquito season and before the first snowfall, in October. Hours earlier, as daylight faded, thousands crowded into a huge outdoor sports complex. A stage was framed by a deep-green backdrop of unbroken forest. Balloons were released, torches were lit, and a troupe belted out a song:

There is only one joy for us,
And this is all we need,
To wash our faces in the new oil,
Of the drilling rig.

Little wonder Russians are toasting oil: These are boom times. Global oil prices have increased tenfold since 1998, and Russia has pulled ahead of Saudi Arabia as the world's top crude oil producer. The Kremlin's budget now overflows with funds for new schools, roads, and national defense projects, and Moscow's nouveau riche are plunking down millions of dollars for mansion-scale "dachas."

The pumping heart of the boom is western Siberia's boggy oil fields, which produce around 70 percent of Russia's oil—some seven million barrels a day. For Khanty-Mansi, a territory nearly the size of France, the bonanza provides an unparalleled opportunity to create modern, even desirable living conditions in a region whose very name evokes a harsh, desolate place. Khanty-Mansi's regional capital, scene of the holiday revelries, is being rebuilt with oil-tax proceeds. The new structures include an airport terminal (once a wooden shack with an outhouse), an art museum featuring paintings by 19th-century Russian masters, and a pair of lavishly equipped boarding schools for children gifted in mathematics and the arts. Even the provincial town of Surgut, a backwater only a few decades ago, is laying out new suburbs and is plagued by traffic jams.

But the opportunity presented by oil could slip through the region's fingers. Despite the remarkable surge in oil prices, oil production in western Siberia has leveled off in recent years. Output barely rose from 2004 to 2007—a period when the rulers of the Kremlin, a cold-eyed and control-oriented crew, seized choice fields once held by private oil barons. The oligarchs, as they were known, were rapacious sorts who jousted among themselves for spoils. But they also heavily invested in the fields in order to maximize production and profits. The Kremlin, by contrast, aims to exploit oil not only as a source of national wealth, but also as a political tool for making Russia a great world power once again. Its heavy-handed tactics have made foreign investors wary and could undermine the boom—and with it Khanty-Mansi's chances for a brighter future.

WESTERN SIBERIA'S great oil deposits lie under lands that an exiled Marxist revolutionary, suffering in the gulag, once called the "waste places of the Earth." But to someone visiting by choice, oil country looks fetchingly wild and pristine. The terrain is dominated by taiga—dense forest of spindly birch, cedar, and pine—and boloto, peaty marsh that is frozen for most of the year and in spots bubbles with methane. There are no mountains and few hills, but there are numerous lakes, rivers, and streams.

Oil exploration began in earnest here in the mid-1960s. When geologists reported that large reserves of oil were waiting to be tapped, the Kremlin organized a frenzied military-style invasion of "pioneers" and bulldozers to ramp up production. Western Siberia, it turned out, had even more black gold than anyone had dreamed: More than 70 billion barrels have been pumped over the past 40 years.

In the early days "Siberia was all frontier," says Khanty-Mansi's governor, Alexander Filipenko. The governor appears older than his 58 years, with a shock of gray hair, watery eyes, and a mottled nose that has weathered its share of frost. Filipenko arrived in Khanty-Mansi in the early 1970s with orders to lay a bridge over the Ob River, which in the late 19th century was a route for squalid barges transporting prisoners to their final places of banishment. The bridge project took four years of toil under brutal conditions. Yet despite the hardships, the governor looks back at that time the way an old man might recall his first love for a beautiful young woman.

Filipenko is equally passionate about his latest project—the redevelopment of the provincial capital, Khanty-Mansiysk, a town of 60,000. He attends to every detail, and he has the funds to remake the capital to his liking. The province's oil industry generates 40 billion dollars in annual tax revenues, 4.5 billion dollars of which Khanty-Mansi gets to keep for its own use. The rest goes to Moscow.

His party background notwithstanding, Filipenko's vision is a distinctly non-Soviet one. The capital's leading architectural symbols include a shopping emporium topped by an enormous green dome in the shape of a chum, the traditional tent used by the region's indigenous people—the Khanty, Mansi, and others who herd reindeer, hunt, and fish. That symbolism would have been unthinkable in Soviet times, when the state, with its ideological cult of "the worker," denied the very idea of culturally derived identity.

When Siberia's oil lands came under development, native people were forcibly herded into villages and cut off from their hunting and fishing grounds. Following the breakup of the Soviet Union, the nomads won legal status as "aboriginal people," with the right to roam the oil fields. In spite of their new status and the architectural homage in the capital, their lot has hardly improved. Their numbers are small, about 30,000 in all; their languages are nearly extinct; and they are heavily afflicted by the scourges of contemporary Russia—AIDS, alcoholism, and tuberculosis. Some oil-tax money is being invested in medical ships that stop along the rivers to care for patients. But critics say these floating clinics diagnose disease, then leave patients with no means to get treatment.

Rural Russia is also being depopulated by the flight of young people to Moscow and other cities. To counter these trends, Filipenko has implemented ambitious plans to turn Khanty-Mansi into a place young people will choose to live in rather than leave. And this effort, he boasts, is working. He notes that Khanty-Mansi has the third highest birthrate among provinces in Russia, and unlike the country as a whole, whose population is in decline, Khanty-Mansi's has increased 18 percent since 1989, from a combination of births and immigration.

Oil composes 90 percent of the capital's economy, which is not surprising given the surge in oil prices. But it points to a problem shared by all resource-dependent economies: At some point the resource will be exhausted, and new sources of prosperity will have to be found. Recognizing the need to develop economic prospects beyond oil, Filipenko persuaded some 80 top researchers from Akademgorodok—a famed science and research town in southern Siberia created in Soviet times—to move to his regional capital to staff a new institute specializing in information technologies. The institute provides consulting services to oil companies, but it also takes on projects in unrelated fields such as nanotechnology.

It's the start of a "Silicon Taiga," says Alexander Sherbakov, a 60-year-old mathematician with a gray walrus mustache. As the era of easy oil comes to an end, he says, "we're going to grow our own scholars" by creating information-age jobs for the younger generation. Unlike investment in oil, investment in science, he says, can guarantee an everlasting bright future for the region's economy and its people.

That's undoubtedly an optimistic assessment. For one thing, the touted model, Silicon Valley, is located in temperate California. In Soviet times the Kremlin could simply order top scientists to move to remote research centers. In post-Soviet times Russia's top researchers can live and work wherever they choose, and most are choosing to live in prosperous cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg.

WHILE THE OIL BOOM has yet to make Siberia a magnet for Russia's knowledge class, it is attracting many other newcomers: impoverished immigrants from beyond Russia's borders. Early one morning, in a vacant lot just off the highway to Filipenko's showcase capital, a group of about 15 shabbily dressed men ranging in age from their 20s to their 40s are waiting for offers of work, however menial. A white Nissan pulls up, and several of the men walk over to talk to the driver, who is looking for a few hands to dig potatoes. But his offering price, just under ten dollars a day, isn't enough, and he drives away without any takers.

These men are what Russians, borrowing a German word, call gastarbeiters—guest workers. They are nearly everywhere in Khanty-Mansi. Most are Muslims from Tajikistan, the former Soviet republic in Central Asia whose economy was shattered by civil war in the mid-1990s. They come here in spring and return home before winter arrives. It's not every day they find a job, but when they do they can earn about $20 lugging bags of cement for a construction crew or doing household cleaning. They wire funds back to their families, and their employers avoid paying taxes on the wages.

The men balk at my request to see their living quarters. One says he is ashamed to show me how he lives. "I don't want you to get the wrong idea," he says. "We are not bandits; we are civilized people. We just need work."

The men are supposed to obtain registration papers certifying their place of residence, but, as they tell me, they have no authorized place to live, bunking instead in unheated garages illegally rented to them. A work boss—a kind of Mafia figure—obtains papers for them by bribing the registration office, but those documents, listing a false address, leave the gastarbeiters at the mercy of the police. When they are found out, they're sometimes forced to pay a spot "fine" (read "bribe"), and repeat offenders may face deportation. Russia's federal government recently put the burden on employers to register the workers and check their identifications, but such measures are unlikely to stem the tide so long as the oil boom continues.

A FLOOD OF RUSSIANS from economically depressed cities west of the Urals is also swelling the oil towns of western Siberia. Forty years ago Surgut was a collection of wooden hovels, in a place where temperatures can plunge to minus 60 degrees Fahrenheit and midwinter darkness lasts for all but a few hours a day. Today Surgut is one of western Siberia's largest cities, with 300,000 people. The new arrivals are voting with their feet, a sign that Russia's new market economy is actually working.

The polish and prosperity on view in Surgut were once unthinkable in Russia's hinterlands. A combined day care and preschool the city recently remodeled with 5.2 million dollars largely from oil revenue now has a heated indoor swimming pool and hydromassage whirlpool; an animal collection with rabbits, turtles, and parrots; and a room with a small wooden stage on which colorfully costumed children diligently perform fairy tales. When weather doesn't permit outdoor exercise, the children can ride around in toy cars in a large, glass-enclosed playroom kept at a moderately chilled temperature. And then the toddlers can be soothed by a hot drink from the herbal tea bar.

I understand that the "foreigner" is being shown the finest kindergarten in town, but only so much can be faked. Stuck in Surgut's traffic jams are as many Hondas, Toyotas, and Nissans as inexpensive Russian-made Ladas. Two-car families are becoming more common with the rise in living standard.

The housing stock of a typical Russian city consists of large (and ugly) multistoried concrete apartment blocks. Surgut boasts a suburban development of single-family town houses, aimed at a new upper middle class of oil company managers, bankers, and entrepreneurs. The redbrick houses, each with its own small plot of land, are being built along a tree-lined stretch of riverfront at an average cost of $400,000. Envious townspeople coined an ironic sobriquet for the elite community: Dolina Nischikh, Valley of the Beggars.

Surgut might have fallen apart, as did some other Russian cities, in the chaos following the collapse of the Soviet Union. That it didn't is a testament to the rootedness and stability of its political and business leadership.

"I was born in Surgut, my children were born here, and my grandchildren were born here," Alexander Sidorov, the city's longtime mayor, proudly declares. Surgut's economic anchor, the oil company Surgutneftegas, Russia's fourth largest producer, is majority owned by local managers. And unlike most Russian oil barons, who rule their western Siberian empires from Moscow, Surgutneftegas's general director, billionaire Vladimir Bogdanov, makes his home in town. Though now a towering figure in Surgut, Bogdanov started out as a common neftyanik.

Surgutneftegas is using the oil boom to finance an ambitious modernization program. At the oil field management center, computer engineers have custom designed an enormous digital map to monitor and adjust the field's performance. The map displays real-time information sent by coded radio signal from pump stations, active wells, and pipelines. From this display, managers can tell how much electric power is being consumed, whether a well needs repairs, and whether a pipeline is leaking.

Protection of the environment, barely a concern in Soviet times, is becoming part of the new ethos. It's not that the oil industry has suddenly become softhearted toward flora and fauna. Rather, high oil prices provide an incentive to minimize waste, as do license agreements that include big fines for spills. Moreover, as Russian oil firms have become global players, they've also become more sensitive to international concerns about the environment. "Maintaining a good reputation is very important," says Alexey Knizhnikov of the World Wildlife Fund in Moscow. "Otherwise, doing business becomes difficult."

Lubov Malyshkina, director of the environmental department at Surgutneftegas, is a chemical engineer with an advanced degree in the science of corrosion protection and geoecology. She also serves as an elected official in the regional parliament. In Soviet times, she says, the oil ministry in Moscow, oblivious to local conditions, would send chemicals that proved useless to treat oil spills and other hazards. Now Malyshkina's department, drawing on a nearly 500-million-dollar budget, makes its own purchases. She shows me one: a Swedish-made Truxor vehicle with tanklike treads that break up oil-saturated peat so that spills can be cleaned up. The company is also investing five million dollars in a new plant for recycling old tires into fibers that can be mixed into the asphalt used to pave company roads.

One aspect of the oil industry here hasn't changed: The neftyanik's job is still hazardous and grueling. At a rig about an hour's drive from Surgut, villagers gathering mushrooms are dwarfed by massive pumps, whose rhythmic motion suggests a giant bird dipping its beak to the soil. Metal stairs slick with oil lead to a platform where a drill is boring through rock with a diamond-coated bit nearly a foot in diameter. It's noisy and the air is foul, but this is a good spot to be in winter, I'm told, because the platform is bathed in steam. The men work eight-hour shifts for up to 30 straight days, sleeping on-site in trailer wagons, then rest off-site for up to 30 days. Alcohol is strictly forbidden. Drink all you want during your rest, the men are told, but return sober.

Yet the jobs are a route to a prosperity unimaginable a few years ago. The least experienced workers get a monthly salary of $1,000, the most senior hands as much as $4,000. And there are bonuses for exceeding daily quotas. A thrifty neftyanik can save enough to purchase a flat in Surgut's apartment complexes—if not a town house in the Valley of the Beggars.

All of this is impressive, of course. But the larger question for Surgutneftegas, and every oil firm in Khanty-Mansi, is whether they can rise to the myriad political, economic, and technical challenges on the horizon. While most analysts expect western Siberia to remain the dominant source of Russia's oil for at least the next 20 years, the region's oil fields are aging. Coaxing additional barrels of oil from the ground is becoming more difficult and expensive, and maintaining production will require infusions of capital and expertise from sources outside Russia. But burdensome taxes—all gross revenues above $25 a barrel go to the federal government—and Kremlin-backed power plays have chilled the investment climate like a Siberian blizzard. One need only visit Nefteyugansk, a city of 114,000 on the Ob River about an hour's drive from Surgut, to see why.

A BLACK GUSHER of trouble is what the oil boom has been for Nefteyugansk, which has the look and feel of an unkempt industrial park. The central plaza is strewn with iron pipes, and down by the river a crumpled barrel of Shell oil floats next to a dilapidated dock. A few paces inside the gate of the town's cemetery lies the grave of Vladimir Petukhov, the burial ground's most famous resident. In 1996 the townspeople elected Petukhov as their mayor. Two years later, as he walked to work on a June morning, he was shot to death by a pair of gunmen. An etching on his black marble gravestone depicts him in a crewneck sweater and leather jacket.

For more than ten years oil has been at the center of a violent and chaotic power struggle in Nefteyugansk. The difficulties began in the mid-1990s, when a nouveau riche Moscow banker snagged one of Russia's prime oil producers—and the town's sole large employer—in a privatization auction. The banker, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, made the Nefteyugansk unit the core subsidiary in his new oil company, known as Yukos. But he antagonized the city by delaying tax payments, causing city workers to go unpaid for months. Mayor Petukhov, a former neftyanik, led public protests against the new Moscow owners, who, he said, "spit into our faces, the faces of oilers." The mayor's murder, at the age of 48, outraged the townspeople, many of whom connected the deed to his stand against Yukos. "This blood is on your hands," read anti-Yukos banners put up at city hall by Petukhov's mourners.

For five years no one was brought to justice. During this time the city was governed by a corrupt official who eventually was sent to jail for swindling oil workers out of their promised retirement homes in Russia's balmy Black Sea region. Oil prices, meanwhile, went ever higher, inflating the value of Khodorkovsky's holdings. And then the hammer came down.

In June 2003, Moscow prosecutors arrested Yukos's security chief on charges of organizing the execution of Petukhov. Four months later they arrested Khodorkovsky on charges of fraud and tax evasion. Tax authorities seized the Nefteyugansk subsidiary and handed it over to a Kremlin-controlled company called Rosneft. Khodorkovsky was convicted and carted off to jail in southeastern Siberia, where his face was slashed by an inmate. Meanwhile, the security chief was convicted in a trial heavily publicized on state television. In the latest development, prosecutors announced last February that Yukos co-owner Leonid Nevzlin also would be charged in Petukhov's murder.

Perhaps it did happen the way the government claimed, but ask folks in Nefteyugansk about the murder, and they tend to shrug and say they don't know what to believe. The coordinated elements of the Yukos affair have the whiff of a Moscow plot hatched by the KGB types in control of the Kremlin. The result, in any case, is that a cash cow—and still the town's livelihood—has passed from the hands of a Moscow oligarch into the hands of the Kremlin.

When I show up in town, Sergey Burov has been mayor for four months. He was once a deputy director for Rosneft and before that a senior manager for Yukos. He, too, is no stranger to violence: In 2005, while walking to his car in the morning, he took a bullet to the stomach. It looked like another contract job, but prosecutors closed the case without finding a culprit.

Burov is a burly man whose wide shoulders stretch his suit. He is interested in talking about the town's future, not its bloody past. In partnership with Rosneft, he tells me, the city administration has ambitious plans to redevelop Nefteyugansk. Come back in two years, he says, and I will see an entirely different town, maybe even a yacht club. After the interview his press secretary shows off an indoor sports facility with an Olympic-size swimming pool. In the central plaza, the one littered with pipe just a few days earlier, workers are starting to install brick walkways and flower beds.

Are things finally looking up for Nefteyugansk? Residents seem skeptical. "Maybe Rosneft feels better being here," Vasily Voroshilov, a 52-year-old oil well repairman, says. "But we don't feel it."

That skepticism is shared by many observers outside Russia, who say it's one thing to seize control of an oil company and quite another to run it. Says one analyst of the Kremlin's takeover of Russian oil, "You can steal a Chevy, but that doesn't mean you know how to drive it."

FOR ALL THE WEALTH that oil can produce, it is often as much a curse as a blessing for countries such as Russia. Early in the 1990s, before the oil boom, Boris Yeltsin encouraged local provinces to grab what autonomy they could. This was when Russia's potential for political pluralism and Western-style grassroots democracy looked greatest. When oil prices rose toward the end of the decade, the Kremlin realized that this source of wealth could be used to bring about a humiliated Russia's global resurgence. Salvation by oil has since become an article of national faith.

"Oil," said a 16-year-old student at Khanty-Mansiysk's school for math whizzes, "is the only way for our country to stand up, to survive." Actually, there are many ways that the Russians, a creative and educated people, can revive their country. But oil suggests national potency, and Russia's petroleum patrimony lends itself to patriotic incantations of an almost mystical kind. At the festivities on Oilers' Day one of the songs, a salute to the collective might of the neftyaniki, proclaimed, "We are the fingers pressed tightly into a fist."

"Russia's superpower status today comes from energy, not its military," says Julia Nanay, a senior director at PFC Energy, a global consultancy based in Washington, D.C. "The Kremlin determines what happens with oil in western Siberia. They want to control production and exports in order to maximize Russia's geopolitical relevance."

Just as the tsars of old exercised monopolies on valuable commodities such as fur and salt, the Kremlin wants direct control over oil—and over the oligarchs who produce it. Those who come to heel survive; those who don't risk suffering Khodorkovsky's fate, or worse.

One of the survivors is Vagit Alekperov, president of Russia's biggest private oil company, Lukoil. Starting out working on the rigs near his native Baku, Alekperov was sent to Siberia in the late 1970s to manage an oil-production team. A notoriously strict paternalist, he angered his men by banning the sale of alcohol in the village. Several of them grabbed hunting rifles and fired shots at his cabin, but Alekperov, ever the survivor, wasn't there at the time.

During the final days of the Soviet Union, Alekperov forged Lukoil from prime oil assets in western Siberia. Today the company is a global multinational with hydrocarbon reserves second only to ExxonMobil—and some 2,000 gas stations in the U.S. Though most of Lukoil's reserves are in western Siberia, Alekperov keeps his headquarters just two miles from the Kremlin. Like other survivors, he knows that he must be attentive to any change in political mood that could affect Lukoil's fortunes, for better or worse.

A distinguished-looking man with bronze skin and a crop of steel gray hair, Alekperov dresses in impeccably tailored suits. A tough guy, he can also charm. When pressed on whether oil consumers around the world should feel comfortable now that Russia has a large finger on the globe's petroleum tap, he leaned back in his chair, smiled expansively, and asked, "Do I look like a bear?" I couldn't help laughing. "We just want to make money."

Having gobbled up Yukos, might the Kremlin want to swallow Lukoil next? "I don't think either the government or the president of Russia will target such a company," Alekperov remonstrates. I decide not to mention that Khodorkovsky had told me the same thing not long before his arrest.

Lukoil's base of operations in Khanty-Mansi is the town of Kogalym. A roadside floral arrangement spells out the company's name not far from the golden domes of a Russian Orthodox cathedral and the green minaret of a mosque. At a refurbished maternity house—what Russians call a roddom—Dr. Galina Pustovit, director of the gynecology department, shows off new Western-standard medical equipment. In a country where many women deliver their babies in Soviet-era buildings reeking of sour cabbage and damp concrete, this gleaming facility rates four stars.

When I mention to Pustovit that Russia's oil industry is known for being corrupt, the doctor gives me a sharp look. "This is oil," she says, sweeping a hand around the gynecology ward. "Oilers built this hospital. All of the objects in this city have been built with oil money, including our beautiful boulevard." Don't judge us too harshly, her look says: Life in these parts has never been better.


-
By Paul Starobin
Photograph by Gerd Ludwig

World Oil - World oil demand is surging as supplies approach their limits.

Tapped Out

World Oil

In 2000 a Saudi oil geologist named Sadad I. Al Husseini made a startling discovery. Husseini, then head of exploration and production for the state-owned oil company, Saudi Aramco, had long been skeptical of the oil industry's upbeat forecasts for future production. Since the mid-1990s he had been studying data from the 250 or so major oil fields that produce most of the world's oil. He looked at how much crude remained in each one and how rapidly it was being depleted, then added all the new fields that oil companies hoped to bring on line in coming decades. When he tallied the numbers, Husseini says he realized that many oil experts "were either misreading the global reserves and oil-production data or obfuscating it."

Where mainstream forecasts showed output rising steadily each year in a great upward curve that kept up with global demand, Husseini's calculations showed output leveling off, starting as early as 2004. Just as alarming, this production plateau would last 15 years at best, after which the output of conventional oil would begin "a gradual but irreversible decline."

That is hardly the kind of scenario we've come to expect from Saudi Aramco, which sits atop the world's largest proven oil reserves—some 260 billion barrels, or roughly a fifth of the world's known crude—and routinely claims that oil will remain plentiful for many more decades. Indeed, according to an industry source, Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi took a dim view of Husseini's report, and in 2004 Husseini retired from Aramco to become an industry consultant. But if he is right, a dramatic shift lies just ahead for a world whose critical systems, from defense to transportation to food production, all run on cheap, abundant oil.



-
By Paul Roberts
Photograph by Randy Olson

If the Stones Could Speak - Searching for the Meaning of Stonehenge

Stonehenge

Stonehenge at night

The first glimpse often comes from the road. Blurring past on the A303 thoroughfare that cuts heedlessly almost across the monument's very entrance, Stonehenge appears as a cluster of insignificant protrusions on the big, otherwise featureless plain; and yet, even from this profane and glancing vantage, the great-shouldered silhouette is so unmistakably prehistoric that the effect is momentarily of a time warp cracking onto a lost world.

Up close, amid the confusion of broken and standing stones, it still seems smaller than its reputation, notwithstanding the obvious feat represented by the erection of the famous sarsen stones; the largest weighs as much as 50 tons. Unique today, Stonehenge was probably also unique in its own time, some 4,500 years ago—a stone monument modeled on timber precedents. Indeed, its massive lintels are bound to their uprights by mortise-and-tenon joints taken straight from carpentry, an eloquent indication of just how radically new this hybrid monument must have been. It is this newness, this assured awareness that nothing like it had existed before, this revelatory quality, that is still palpable in its ruined stones. The people who built Stonehenge had discovered something hitherto unknown, hit upon some truth, turned a corner—there is no doubt that the purposefully placed stones are fraught with meaning.

But what in fact do they mean? Despite countless theories offered over centuries, no one knows. Stonehenge is the most famous relic of prehistory in Europe and one of the best known, most contemplated monuments in the world—and we have no clear idea what the people who built it actually used it for.

In the past, archaeologists sought to crack this enigma by wringing every fact they could from the stones themselves, subjecting their contours, marks, and even shadows to scrutiny. Recently, though, the search has led investigators farther afield, away from Stonehenge itself to the remains of a nearby Neolithic village on the one hand, and on the other to a craggy mountain peak in southwestern Wales. While no definitive answer has yet emerged, these two very different searches-in-progress have stirred tantalizing new possibilities.

STONEHENGE AROSE from a rich tradition of equally enigmatic structures. Henges—circular banks of earth paralleled by an internal ditch—earth barrows and mounds, circular timber structures, monoliths, and circles and horseshoes of stone were all common throughout Neolithic Britain and parts of continental Europe. (Strictly speaking, Stonehenge is not, as its name implies, a henge, because the position of its bank and ditch are reversed.) At different stages of its evolution Stonehenge reflected many of these traditions. The first certain structural stones of Stonehenge, the bluestones, which were floated, dragged, and hauled from Wales, most likely arrived sometime before 2500 B.C. The giant sarsens followed, filling out the monument, which was at some point linked by an avenue to the River Avon. Stonehenge, then, is the culmination of a dynamic evolution; the pre-stone earthworks thrown up in grassland probably embodied different beliefs than the later monument of stone that was resolutely connected to water.




-
By Caroline Alexander
National Geographic Contributing Writer

Photograph by Ken Geiger
National Geographic Staff

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

International: Peacekeeping and sex abuse - Who will watch the watchmen?

The harm that is done by people sent to do good

ORGANISATIONS that send peacekeepers and aid workers to dangerous places are usually concerned about their envoys' physical safety. But an uglier concern has recently surfaced: how to ensure the moral integrity of people who are supposed to be helping others.

A report this week by the British branch of Save the Children, an aid organisation, underlines the problem. In a study carried out last year in three places with a strong international presence—southern Sudan, Haiti and Côte d'Ivoire—the charity said it had found widespread sexual abuse of children, some as young as six, by aid workers and, above all, by UN peacekeepers. More than half the 250 boys and girls aged 10-17 it interviewed said they knew of such cases. But the abuse remained “widely underreported”, it said, because most children were too frightened to come forward.

Sadly, the report tells a familiar tale. The UN in particular has been plagued by sex scandals among its peacekeepers in recent years. After a particularly shocking series of rapes by Nepalese blue-helmets in Congo in 2003, Kofi Annan, then UN secretary-general, set up a committee of inquiry. Its damning findings of “repeated patterns” of rape and other sexual abuse by peacekeepers prompted Mr Annan to announce three years ago a policy of “zero tolerance” for such crimes for all the 200,000 or so personnel, civilian and military, who are employed by the UN and its agencies around the world.

The world body has always banned its staff in the field from having sex with prostitutes or anyone under the age of 18. It also “strongly discourages” sexual relations even with consenting adults in the host population. “Conduct and discipline” teams have now been set up in each of the UN's 17 peacekeeping missions, along with an overarching special unit at its headquarters in New York, to help eradicate the scourge. In addition, since 2005 all new peacekeepers have been required to undergo training to prevent sexual exploitation before being sent to the field.

But the abuse continues, seemingly unabated. Following the scandal in Congo, there have been serious incidents of alleged rape of civilians by blue-helmets every single year—in Burundi (2004), Sudan (2005), Haiti (2006), Liberia (2006) and Côte d'Ivoire (2007). Last year the UN received 748 allegations of misconduct by its peacekeepers, 127 of which involved sexual exploitation and abuse. Most, if not all, will be investigated. But few are likely to lead to convictions or sanctions.

For when it comes to its blue-helmets, the UN finds itself in a bind. Although it can, and does, investigate any serious complaints against them, it has no jurisdiction over the alleged culprits. Only their home states have the authority to try and punish them. Most peacekeeping troops come from the developing world—Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, Jordan, Nigeria, Nepal and Ghana are the biggest contributors—and many prefer to sweep such incidents under the carpet. All the UN can do is to dismiss them and recommend their repatriation. As all peacekeeping troops enjoy absolute legal immunity, the host country cannot do anything either.

Civilian police attached to such missions are a different matter. Like other non-local UN civilian staff in the field, they enjoy only qualified immunity—for actions committed in the course of their official functions. Rape and the abuse of minors would not fall into that category, of course. So such crimes could, in theory, be prosecuted locally. In practice, however, this is unlikely, as the kind of countries to which blue-helmets are sent have either appalling justice systems, or non-existent ones. Besides, finding witnesses willing to speak and assembling sufficient evidence are often virtually impossible in such chaos.

Aid agencies and other NGOs are subject to different laws again. Their foreign-based workers have no immunity in the host country. If they come from civil-law countries, like France, they may be prosecuted—though with great difficulty—back home. Citizens of common-law states, like Britain and most old Commonwealth states, cannot usually be prosecuted at home for crimes committed abroad, but they can be for sex offences.

Most NGOs have codes of conduct, under which the purchase of sexual favours, let alone actual abuse, is strictly banned. But the toughest penalty they can impose is dismissal. Save the Children UK recently sacked three workers for having sex with girls of 17, which, though not illegal, breached its code.

The charity now wants an international watchdog to tackle abuse. How it can succeed where the UN has failed is unclear. One of the biggest problems is not just the unwillingness of victims to complain, but their ignorance of their basic rights. What is needed, suggests Françoise Hampson, a professor of international law, is a campaign to inform the locals of their rights, along with an easily accessible complaints procedure. But in a huge, chaotic place like Congo, that's a tall order.

Another way to improve the present system, she says, would be to require heads of mission to investigate any allegations of wrongdoing at the first whisper, rather than waiting for a formal complaint. She also proposes that the agreements drawn up between the UN and troop-contributing nations be modified to oblige the state at least to tell the UN what it has done to punish wrongdoers.

The UN has been trying to strengthen its procedures. Under a revised “model memorandum of understanding” adopted last year, governments are now explicitly required “to bring the full force of their legal sanctions to bear” to enforce the UN's standards of conduct. What that will mean in practice has yet to be seen. But at least investigation procedures have improved. Upon notification of a case of serious misconduct, the UN now not only informs the country concerned, but also invites it to investigate the incident in co-operation with its own Office of Internal Oversight Services. The new arrangement was applied for the first time to alleged abuse by Sri Lankan peacekeepers in Haiti last year. Over 100 soldiers now face court-martial.

Deeming the new report “deeply disturbing”, Nick Birnback, the UN's spokesman for peacekeeping, said it was impossible to ensure “zero incidents” in such a big organisation. “What we can do is to get across a message of zero tolerance, which for us means zero complacency when credible allegations are raised, and zero impunity when we find that there has been malfeasance,” he said. That would indeed be a useful start.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

International: Corporal punishment - Spare the rod, say some

In rich countries at least, parents and teachers are steadily losing the right to discipline children by force

“AS PART of their daily lives, children across Europe and the world continue to be spanked, slapped, hit, smacked, shaken, kicked, pinched, punched, caned, flogged, belted, beaten and battered in the name of discipline, mainly by adults whom they depend on.” But in some places, it happens less than before, and there is a chance to stop it altogether.

That is how the Council of Europe, a 47-country body that is supposed to promote civil liberties from Dublin to Vladivostok, explains its campaign to abolish physical punishment—to be launched in Croatia in mid-June with a flurry of debates, puppet shows, television spots, pamphlets in many languages and stirring calls to “raise your hand against smacking”.

As is often the case with such worthy efforts, the council's rhetoric seems torn between stressing the horrors of the present day and promising that things can easily improve if everybody tries a bit harder. And in a world where children face such horrors as forced labour, sex trafficking and military conscription, devoting energy to outlawing parental smacks may strike some people as the wrong emphasis. But a consensus against hitting children is clearly gathering momentum in the developed, law-governed parts of the world. Also growing is the belief that a light parental cuff and serious forms of child abuse are points, albeit quite far apart, on the same spectrum. Some parents may still insist that their right to dissuade a toddler from doing very dangerous things is also worth protecting; but they are losing the argument.

Only 23 countries (18 of them European) have banned corporal punishment completely. But there are 106—including many places where it was common only a generation ago—which have put a stop to corporal punishment in schools.

Countries where teachers still use force include the United States, where a Supreme Court ruling in 1977 (concerning two pupils whose beatings with a wooden paddle caused medical harm) found that a constitutional ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” applied only to judicial proceedings. That left individual states to decide; in 22 of them, corporal correction in schools occurs in at least some districts.

Elizabeth Gershoff of the University of Michigan, an expert on (and opponent of) physical correction, says the practice remains common in American classrooms and homes. Most American children have been corporally punished at home by the time they reach adolescence, and in a recent year, nearly 300,000 were physically punished at school.

In Europe, by contrast, smacking has nearly vanished from schools (even in Britain and Ireland, where it was rife) and the movement to stop parents and other adults hitting children is gaining ground. In 1979 Sweden became the first country to outlaw all violence by adults on children. It was controversial at the time, but after a two-year drive to publicise the law and the thinking behind it, which included putting advice on milk cartons, smacking itself, and belief in its value, declined fast.

Just over a year ago New Zealand became the first English-speaking country to ban smacking. A lobby group, Family First, is agitating to reverse that change, saying at least half the population supports the right to smack. But few people expect the ban to be overturned. The police were reassured when they won the right to apply the law with discretion, and there have been no silly prosecutions. Some of New Zealand's pro-smackers lost support because their religious rhetoric—talk of loving corrections, followed by prayers—sounded weird.


In recent years, several European countries (Greece and Portugal, for example) have quietly abolished parental smacking after a Swiss-based lobby group challenged them for being in breach of the European social charter, a Council of Europe treaty. Three Latin American states (Chile, Uruguay and Venezuela) joined the non-smackers last year. Although nobody expects corporal punishment to vanish soon from traditional homes in Africa or the Middle East, the United States could soon stand out in the Americas, and among rich countries, as a refuge for the spanker.

Indeed, it is the only country, along with Somalia, which has failed to ratify a United Nations convention on children's rights, which since 1990 has protected children from “all forms of physical or mental violence”. American officials helped draft the document, but it faces stiff opposition in some quarters of the United States.

Some Americans regret this. In a paper last year, Ms Gershoff and Susan Bitensky, of Michigan State University, said their country should bow to the combined pressure of a growing world consensus against smacking and scholarly evidence that it is useless or harmful. Summarising scores of studies, they conclude that smacking fails in one of its main aims: to make a child see that some things are wrong, and change its long-term behaviour.

Lots of studies, however, find a correlation between corporal punishment and aggressive, delinquent behaviour. It is hard to prove that the smacks cause the behaviour, rather than vice versa, but Ms Gershoff insists that by rigorously combing the data, one can show that parents are most to blame for this vicious circle.

Other scholars, such as Robert Larzelere of Oklahoma State University, defend the role of smacking in disciplining younger children, though he agrees that it is counter-productive for older ones.

Still, for countries wanting a halfway house, defining the permissible is tricky. In Britain parents can strike, not bruise; in Canada children aged 2-12 can be struck, but not with objects or on the head: “minor corrective force of a transitory and trifling nature” is allowed. And regardless of the law, social changes seem to be making parents in rich countries cautious about smacking. Many Americans who oppose a ban on corporal punishment say they don't consider the practice desirable.

But diehard American spankers may take comfort from defying the latest piece of Utopian dottiness from the UN: a campaign to end the corporal punishment of children, all over the world, by 2009. Whatever the merits of a ban on smacking, this wildly unrealistic goal is hardly the top priority for an organisation that has failed to crack down on far worse forms of abuse by its own blue-helmeted soldiers.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Economics focus: The Doha dilemma

Does freer farm trade help poor people?

THE global food crisis has shone a harsh spotlight on the consequences of government meddling in agriculture. Poor people go hungry, in part, because Americans pay their farmers to divert crops from food to fuel. But in at least two areas, the crisis has emboldened those who are sceptical of free markets in food.

The first is “food security”. Politicians in rich and poor countries have seized on recent price spikes as proof that free farm trade is a risky business and self-sufficiency a worthy goal. The second area concerns the poor. For years reformers have advocated freer trade on the grounds that market distortions, particularly the rich world's subsidies, depress prices and hurt rural areas in poor countries, where three-quarters of the world's indigent live. The Doha round of trade talks is dubbed the “development round” in large part because of its focus on farms. But now high food prices are being blamed for hurting the poor (the topic of a big United Nations summit in Rome starting on June 3rd).

The argument for self-sufficiency is easiest to counter. Anyone who believes autarky is the route to food security should look at starving North Korea. In world markets trade barriers, not the lack of them, have exacerbated the mess. The commodities that have seen the biggest price spikes are those which tend to be traded least. Only 6% of global rice production, for instance, flows across borders. Unilateral export restrictions, such as those imposed by Vietnam and India, have made matters worse. Global supply is disrupted and domestic farmers discouraged from producing more. The route to deeper, less volatile markets lies through freer trade and fewer distortions. The notion that free trade precludes food security is plainly wrong-headed.

The links between trade, food prices and poverty reduction are more subtle. Different types of reform have diverse effects on prices. When countries cut their tariffs on farm goods, their consumers pay lower prices. In contrast, when farm subsidies are slashed, world food prices rise. The lavishness of farm subsidies means that the net effect of fully freeing trade would be to raise prices, by an average of 5.5% for primary farm products and 1.3% for processed goods, according to the World Bank.

These effects are still much smaller than recent food-price spikes, but would they, on balance, help or hurt the poor? In crude terms, food-exporting countries gain in the short term whereas net importers lose. Farmers are better off; those who buy their food fare worse. Although most of the world's poor live in rural areas, they are not, by and large, net food sellers. A forthcoming study* of nine poor countries by M. Ataman Aksoy and Aylin Isik-Dikmelik, two economists at the World Bank, shows that even in very rural countries, such as Bangladesh and Zambia, only one-fifth of households sell more food than they buy. That suggests the losers may outnumber winners.

But things are not so simple. The authors point out that net food buyers tend to be richer than net sellers, so high food prices, on average, transfer income from richer to poorer households. And prices are not the only route through which poverty is affected. Higher farm income boosts demand for rural labour, increasing wages for landless peasants and others who buy rather than grow their food. Several studies show this income effect can outweigh the initial price effect. Finally, the farm sector itself can grow. Decades of underinvestment in agriculture have left many poor countries reliant on imports: over time that can change.

The World Bank has often argued that the balance of all these factors is likely to be positive. Although freer farm trade—and higher prices—may raise poverty rates in some countries, it will reduce them in more. One much-cited piece of evidence is a study by Thomas Hertel, Roman Keeney, Maros Ivanic and Alan Winters. This analysis simulated the effect of getting rid of all subsidies and barriers on global prices and trade volumes. It then mapped these results on to detailed household statistics in 15 countries, which between them covered 1 billion people. Fully free trade in farm goods would reduce poverty in 13 countries while raising it in two.


But lately the bank seems to be taking a different line. Robert Zoellick, the bank's president, claims that the food-price crisis will throw 100m people below the poverty line, undoing seven years of progress. His figure comes from extrapolating the results of a different study** by Mr Ivanic and Will Martin, another World Bank economist. This study analyses the effects of more expensive staple foods on poverty by examining household surveys in nine countries. In seven cases, higher food prices meant more poverty. (Dani Rodrik, a blogging Harvard economist, was one of the first to highlight the tension between these studies.)

In fact, the bank's results are not as contradictory as they seem. The two studies are based on different sets of countries: only Peru, Zambia and Vietnam appear in both. And the gloomy analysis measures only the effect of pricier staple foods, whereas the other examines freer trade in all farm goods. Such trade brings broader benefits: even if higher prices for staples exacerbate poverty in some countries, at least in the short term, the effect may be outweighed by increased demand for other farm exports, such as processed goods, as rich countries cut tariffs.

These subtleties suggest two conclusions. First, the bank, and others, should beware sweeping generalisations about the impact of food prices on the poor. Second, the nature of trade reform matters. Removing rich-country subsidies on staple goods, the focus of much debate in the Doha round, may be less useful in the fight against poverty than cutting tariffs would be. The food-price crisis has not hurt the case for freer farm trade. But it has shown how important it is to get it right.


*“Are Low Food Prices Pro-Poor? Net Food Buyers and Sellers in Low Income Countries” by M. Ataman Aksoy and Aylin Isik-Dikmelik. World Bank (forthcoming)

†“Distributional Effects of WTO agricultural reforms in rich and poor countries” by Thomas Hertel, Roman Keeney, Maros Ivanic and Alan Winters. Economic Policy, April 2007

**“Implications of Higher Global Food Prices for Poverty in Low-Income Countries” by Maros Ivanic and Will Martin. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 4594, April 2008

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Briefing: Energy - Double, double, oil and trouble

Is it “peak oil” or a speculative bubble? Neither, really

AFTER oil hit its recent record of $135 a barrel, consumers and politicians started to lash out in every direction. Fishermen in France have been blockading ports and pouring oil on the roads in protest. British lorry drivers have paraded coffins through London as a token of the imminent demise of the haulage industry. In response, Gordon Brown, Britain's prime minister, is badgering oil bosses to increase production from the North Sea, while Nicolas Sarkozy, the president of France, wants the European Union to suspend taxes on fuel.

In America, too, politicians are haranguing oil bosses and calling for tax cuts. Congress has approved a bill to prevent the government from adding to America's strategic stocks of oil, and is contemplating another to enable American prosecutors to sue the governments of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) for market manipulation.

But the most popular scapegoats are “speculators” of the more traditional sort. OPEC itself routinely blames them for high prices. The government of India is so sure that speculation makes commodities dearer that it has banned the trading of futures contracts for some of them (although not oil). Germany's Social Democratic Party proposes an international ban on borrowing to buy oil futures, on the same grounds. Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate's Homeland Security Committee, is also mulling regulation of some sort, having concluded that “speculators are responsible for a big part of the commodity price increases”. The assumption underlying such ideas is that a bubble is forming, and that if it were popped, the price of oil would be much lower.

Others assume the reverse: that the price is bound to keep rising indefinitely, since supplies of oil are running short. The majority of the world's crude, according to believers in “peak oil”, has been discovered and is already being exploited. At any rate, the size of new fields is diminishing. So production will soon reach a pinnacle, if it has not done so already, and then quickly decline, no matter what governments do.

As different as these theories are, they share a conviction that something has gone badly wrong with the market for oil. High prices are seen as proof of some sort of breakdown. Yet the evidence suggests that, to the contrary, the rising price is beginning to curb demand and increase supply, just as the textbooks say it should.


Those who see speculators as the culprits point to the emergence of oil and other commodities as a popular asset class, alongside stocks, bonds and property. Ever more investors are piling into the oil markets, the argument runs, pushing up the price as they do so. The number of transactions involving oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the biggest market for oil, has almost tripled since 2004. That neatly mirrors a tripling of the price of oil over the same period.

But Jeffrey Harris, the chief economist of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which regulates NYMEX and other American commodities exchanges, does not see any evidence that the growth of speculation in oil has caused the price to rise. Rising prices, after all, might have been stimulating the growing investment, rather than the other way around. There is no clear correlation between increased speculation and higher prices in commodities markets in general. Despite a continuing flow of investment in nickel, for example, its price has fallen by half over the past year.

By the same token, the prices of several commodities that are not traded on any exchange, and are therefore much harder for speculators to invest in, have risen even faster than that of oil. Deutsche Bank calculates that cadmium, a rare metal, has appreciated twice as much as oil since 2001, for example, and the price of rice has risen fractionally more.

Investment can flood into the oil market without driving up prices because speculators are not buying any actual crude. Instead, they buy contracts for future delivery. When those contracts mature, they either settle them with a cash payment or sell them on to genuine consumers. Either way, no oil is hoarded or somehow kept off the market. The contracts are really a bet about which way the price will go and the number of bets does not affect the amount of oil available. As Mr Harris puts it, there is no limit to the number of “paper barrels” that can be bought and sold.

That makes it harder for a bubble to develop in oil than in the shares of internet firms, say, or in housing, where the supply of the asset is finite. Ultimately, says David Kirsch of PFC Energy, a consultancy, there is only one type of customer for crude: refineries. If speculators on the futures markets get carried away, pushing prices so high that refineries run at a loss, they will simply shut down, causing the price to fall again. Moreover, speculators do not always assume that prices will rise. As recently as last year, the speculative bears on NYMEX outweighed the bulls.

There is, admittedly, a growing category of inherently bullish investment funds that seek to track commodity-price indices, in which oil is usually the biggest component. Politicians have begun to denounce these “index funds”, since they make money for their investors only if prices rise. According to Mr Lieberman, they have grown in value from $13 billion to $260 billion over the past five years. This surge of investors betting on rising prices, many observers contend, has become a self-fulfilling prophecy, helping to push prices ever higher and thus attract yet more investment.

But Bob Greer, of PIMCO, an asset-management firm, argues that even index funds make unlikely suspects. For one thing, they too invest in futures, rather than in physical supplies of oil. So every month, they must trade contracts that are about to fall due for ones that will not mature for several months. That makes them big sellers of oil for prompt delivery.

What is more, their growth is not as impressive as it first appears. Paul Horsnell of Barclays Capital, an investment bank, puts the total value of index funds and other similar investments at $225 billion. That is less than half the market capitalisation of Exxon Mobil, he points out, and a tiny fraction of the $50 trillion-odd of transactions in the oil markets each year. Although index funds have grown quickly, that growth stems in large part from the rise in value of the futures they hold, rather than from fresh investment flows. He estimates that index funds swelled by $13 billion in the first quarter of this year, for example, of which all but $2 billion derives from the rise in commodity prices.


Mr Harris of the CFTC, for one, believes that the oil price is still a function of supply and demand. For the past few years, the world's production capacity has grown only sluggishly. Meanwhile, demand, especially from the developing world, has been growing faster. So there is hardly any slack in the system. Only Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are thought to be able to increase their output from today's levels, and even then, there are doubts, since Saudi Arabia, in particular, is secretive about the state of its oil industry.

That leaves the oil market at the mercy of even small disruptions to supply. Prices tend to jump each time militants sabotage an oil pipeline in Nigeria, bad weather threatens production in the Gulf of Mexico, or political clouds gather over the Persian Gulf.

The problem is exacerbated by a growing mismatch between the type of oil being produced and the refineries that must process it. The most common benchmark prices, including the one used in this article, refer to “light” crude, the least viscous sort, which produces the most petrol and diesel when refined. “Heavy” oil, by contrast, yields more fuel oil, which is used mainly for heating.

At the moment, diesel is in short supply and there is a glut of fuel oil. That makes processing heavy oil unprofitable for some refineries, since the gains from diesel are outweighed by losses on fuel oil. As refineries turn instead to lighter grades, it pushes their prices yet higher. The discount on heavier crudes has risen to record levels. But even then, points out Ed Morse, of Lehman Brothers, another investment bank, Iran is having trouble selling the stuff. It is storing huge quantities of unsold oil on tankers moored off its coast.

Presumably, Iran and other heavy-oil producers will eventually be obliged to drop prices far enough to make processing the stuff worth refiners' while. In the longer run, more refineries will invest in the equipment needed to crack more diesel out of heavy oil. Both steps will, in effect, increase the world's oil supply, and so help to ease prices.

But improving an existing refinery or building a new one is a slow and capital-intensive business. Firms tend to be very conservative in their investments, since refineries have decades-long life-spans, during which prices and profits can fluctuate wildly. It can also be difficult to find a site and obtain the right permits—one of the reasons why no new refineries have been built in America for over 30 years. Worse, new kit is becoming ever more expensive. Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), a consultancy, calculates that capital costs for refineries and petrochemical plants have risen by 76% since 2000.

Much the same applies to the development of new oilfields. CERA reckons that the cost of developing them has risen even faster—by 110%. At the same time, oilmen remain scarred by the rapid expansion of output in the late 1970s, in response to previous spikes in prices, that led to a glut and so to a prolonged slump. Exxon Mobil claims that it still assesses the profitability of potential investments using the same assumptions about the long-term oil price as it did at the beginning of the decade, for fear that prices might tumble again. Environmental concerns are also an obstacle: America, for one, has banned oil production off most of its coastline.

Increasing nationalism on the part of oil-rich countries is adding to the difficulties. Geologists are convinced that there is still a lot of oil to be discovered in the Middle East and the former Soviet Union, but governments in both regions are reluctant to give outsiders access. Elsewhere, the most promising areas for exploration are also the most technically challenging: in deep water, or in the Arctic, or both. Although there have been big recent discoveries in such places, they will take longer to develop, and costs will be higher. The most expensive projects of all involve the extraction of oil from bitumen, shale and even coal, through elaborate processing. The potential for these is more or less unlimited, although analysts put the costs as high as $70 a barrel—more than the oil price this time last year.

Nonetheless, PFC Energy has examined projects that are already under way, and concluded that global oil production will grow by over 3m barrels a day (b/d) over the course of this year and next. In particular, it expects production outside OPEC to grow by about 500,000 b/d both years—a marked increase from the near stagnation of recent years.

Meanwhile, the high price is clearly beginning to crimp demand. The growth in global consumption last year was barely a quarter what it was in 2004 (see chart); this year, it is likely be even lower. In rich countries (or at least among the members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a rough proxy), the effect is even more pronounced. Consumption has been falling for the past two and a half years.

Poorer countries' demand for oil is still rising, albeit at a slowing pace. That is partly because their economies are growing faster, and partly because their consumers are shielded from the rising price through subsidies. But the increasing expense of such measures is forcing governments to water them down or scrap them altogether. That, in turn, should further sap consumption.


China's growing thirst for oil is often put forward as one of the main factors behind today's higher oil prices. Demand for diesel there, for example, rose by over 9% in the year to April. But Mr Morse argues that such growth might not last. The government has ordered oil firms to increase their stocks of fuel by 50% to be sure there are no embarrassing shortages during the Olympics. It is also planning to run some power plants near Beijing on diesel rather than coal, in an attempt to reduce pollution during the games. These measures are helping to boost China's demand for diesel, but the effect will be transitory.

In the short run, neither demand for nor supply of oil is very elastic. It takes time for people to replace their old guzzlers with more fuel-efficient cars, or to switch to jobs with shorter commutes, or to move closer to public transport. By the same token, it can take ten years or more to develop an oilfield after its discovery—and that does not include the time firms need to bolster their exploration units.

Gary Becker, an economist at the University of Chicago, has calculated that in the past, over periods of less than five years, oil consumption in the OECD dropped by only 2-9% when the price doubled. Likewise, oil production in countries outside OPEC grew by only 4% every time the price doubled. But over longer periods, consumption dropped by 60% and supply rose by 35%. The precise numbers may be slightly different this time round, but the pattern will be the same

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Briefing: Fuel subsidies - Crude measures

Not everybody is paying higher prices for oil

HALF of the world's population enjoys fuel subsidies. This estimate, from Morgan Stanley, implies that almost a quarter of the world's petrol is sold at less than the market price. The cheapest petrol is in Venezuela, at 5 cents per litre. That makes China's pump price of 79 cents seem expensive, but even this is a bargain compared with $1.04 in the United States and $2.35 in Germany (see chart).

As the gap has widened between soaring international prices and fixed domestic prices, so has the cost of subsidies. Indeed, budgetary strains are now forcing some governments to lift prices. On May 24th Indonesia raised fuel prices by around 30%. This was the first increase since 2005, but it still leaves petrol too cheap at 65 cents a litre. Dearer oil is likely to push up inflation from 9% to 12%. But without the increase, the government's subsidy bill was heading for an alarming 3% of GDP this year. In the past week Taiwan has also raised petrol prices by 13% and Sri Lanka has lifted them by 24%.

Malaysia has one of the biggest fuel-subsidy bills in the world, estimated at as much as 7% of GDP this year. By holding down the price of petrol, Malaysia now has the lowest inflation rate of all the 32 emerging economies tracked by The Economist. But the government is expected to allow prices to rise soon to curb its widening budget deficit.

In theory, rising crude-oil prices should reduce global demand. But if domestic prices are capped, then emerging economies will continue to guzzle oil, pushing world prices still higher. Emerging economies accounted for more than the whole increase in world oil consumption last year—because demand in the rich economies fell. But recent price increases will make little difference to global consumption unless China and India follow suit.

India's state-owned oil companies face mounting losses, as they are forced to sell fuel at fixed prices below cost. Petrol prices are actually slightly higher in India than in the United States, because Indian motorists pay much higher fuel taxes, but diesel is about 40% cheaper than in America. The oil firms are partly compensated by bonds which the government issues to them—a trick which allows the government to keep the subsidy off its books. At today's prices, the total subsidy (including the full losses of oil companies) could be as much as 2-3% of GDP this year. Morgan Stanley estimates that the government's total budget deficit (central and state governments and all off-budget items) is running at 9% of GDP in this fiscal year. The government must hold an election by May next year, so it is reluctant to raise fuel prices by much. It is thought to be considering a modest rise combined with a cut in excise duty.

In early 2008 Chinese motorists paid roughly the same for their petrol as Americans did. Whereas the pump price in America has since jumped by 33%, Chinese prices have remained fixed, swelling the losses of state-owned refiners. According to Dragonomics, a Beijing-based economic research firm, the retail price for diesel is about 40% below that in America. To cut their losses, oil firms have reduced supply, causing shortages at some petrol stations. However, China is less likely than other countries to lift prices soon. Oil subsidies are estimated at less than 1% of GDP, and its budget surplus and small public debt mean that the government can afford to keep prices down for some time. Most likely, it will delay increasing fuel prices until food-price inflation has eased.

Across the emerging world, governments fear that lifting fuel prices will hurt the poor and so trigger social unrest. Yet fuel subsidies are an inefficient way to protect the poor: they mainly benefit the richer owners of cars and air-conditioners, and favour energy- and capital-intensive industries, rather than those that create most jobs. An IMF study of five emerging economies found that the richest 20% of households received, on average, 42% of total fuel subsidies; the bottom 20% received less than 10%. That money would be better spent on health, education and infrastructure. Not only would this benefit the poor, but higher prices would also help to dampen global oil consumption, and hence the price of oil.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Special Report: EU ENLARGEMENT

If the recent entry of 12 new EU members had been delayed much longer, it might never have happened. That would have been an historic error




-
May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Friday, May 23, 2008

Ungratefulness

The dictionary defines the word ungrateful as “not thankful for favors; disagreeable; thankless.” The first part of this definition stirred me when I read it. How quickly we forget the favors we have received from the Lord—His love, mercy and grace.

It’s so easy to forget! We get busy with our everyday life, our responsibilities and thousands of other things, and we forget all the benefits and blessings of the Lord. No wonder the psalmist says, “ . . . and forget not all his benefits” (Ps. 103:2, NIV). The psalmist David realized that gratefulness is an important ingredient in the life of a worshiper.

It is a very happy day in the life of the believer when we come to the realization that the Lord has given us “every good and perfect gift” (James 1:17, NIV). We can be “content” with what we have—it’s good and perfect.

Satisfied, grateful living reflects our gratitude and brings us into a dimension of peace as nothing else can. I challenge you to seek that place of contentment.

—Marcos Witt

Lord, forgive me for the times when I have allowed discontentment to rule my heart. I choose today to be thankful for all Your benefits.

Marcos Witt, A Worship-Filled Life (1998), 4.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Israel Report 23 May 2008

THIS WEEK'S NEWS:
1. GIVING AWAY THE NORTH – BOMBS IN THE SOUTH
2. BENNY MORRIS: FROM DOVE TO HAWK – ALMOST
3. MEDIA WATCHDOG ACQUITTED OF AL-DURA FOOTAGE LIBEL
4. QUARRY USED FOR THE TEMPLE MOUNT CONSTRUCTION UNCOVERED
5. BRIEFS
6. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: 1912



* * * * * * * * * * * *

1. GIVING AWAY THE NORTH – BOMBS IN THE SOUTH

On Wednesday Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made public what has been known for some time; Israel is speaking with Syria about "reaching a comprehensive peace." Speaking on Wednesday evening, Olmert said: "It is always better to talk than to shoot, and I am happy both sides here have decided to talk." Israelis know perfectly well what Syria demands for a peace treaty; full Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights.

The news created strong reactions among politicians and the population in general in Israel. Member of Knesset (MK) Eliahu Gabbai from the National Religious Party stated: "The Golan is an inseparable part of the State of Israel, it holds the same status as Tel Aviv or any other city." Gabbay said legislation is underway that will demand a two-third Knesset majority to withdraw from the Golan Heights.

Three different polls taken Wednesday evening revealed that a large majority of the population are against any withdrawal from the Golan. The result varied from 70% to 52% against withdrawal. All polls showed increasing opposition towards leaving Golan compared to polls made a month ago. Many believed Olmert uses the peace negotiations to divert attention from the investigation in to his financial dealings. There seems to be mounting evidence that Olmert illegally received and used large sums of money while serving as a minister in the government.

In the south, Gaza terrorists continue to ask for calm while simultaneously shooting rockets at Jewish towns and attacking border crossings. Israelis staff the crossings in order to secure a certain flow of oil, food and other necessary provisions into Gaza. On Thursday morning a suicide bomber drove a truck to the Erez border crossing were he was successfully stopped before entering. However, he managed to detonate the extremely powerful bomb. Due to the quick response from soldiers at the crossing many lives were saved and kidnappings averted. Hamas meanwhile promised harsher action saying that attacks up till now have only been ‘practice runs’.

Israel has not formally responded to Hamas’ request for calm, but according to Major General of the Southern Command, Yoav Galant, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) does not intend to embark on a large-scale operation in Gaza. Galant had no illusions: "We are expecting more attacks," Galant said, and "it will be difficult to counter them for long without suffering casualties."

Comment:
In times of major national decisions democratically elected leaders usually seek a broad backing from their constituency. If the majority of the people is with them, the minority usually accepts defeat. Here Olmert has a problem. Firstly, he is still among the most unpopular politicians in Israel. Secondly, he is under four police investigations. As of now, no charges have been made, but the confidence of the people in their Prime Minister is very low. Thirdly, opinion polls reveal there is a majority against Olmert’s plans on several issues relating to the peace process.

It would seem therefore that this is not a good time to make major decisions. Yet, Olmert is considering plans that, if implemented, would reduce the size of Israel by around one third of its current territory. Judea, Samaria and the Golan would be handed over to the Palestinian Authority and to Syria, respectively.

The opposition in Israel against such plans must be understood in light of history. In the West these historical facts are long since forgotten or ignored for various reasons. Due to the ongoing attacks against Israel, both physically and verbally, the Jews are not allowed to forget that it was Arab attacks that created the present situation. Israel conquered Judea, Samaria, and the Golan in a war that was forced upon them by attacking Arab armies. It was also Arab refusal to have any dealings whatsoever with what they call "the Zionist entity" that precluded peace negotiations after the war.

As long as Israelis see no change in attitude in Syria or among the Palestinian Arabs, one should not expect them to embrace the giving away of religiously, historically and strategically important territory. With support for Hamas growing in the PA, and with Syria refusing to cut their ties with Iran, one is hard proven to say that such a change in attitude is occurring.



2. BENNY MORRIS: FROM DOVE TO HAWK – ALMOST

The Israeli historian, Benny Morris, rose to controversial fame in the 1980s because of a book he wrote that presented a picture of Israel that contradicted traditional historiography of the Arab-Israeli conflict. In his book Morris claimed, that although some Arabs fled in the war of 1948 because they were encouraged to leave by their Arab brothers, many were also driven out by the Jews. In the wake of this book a severely Israel-critical trend arose among a handful of Israeli scholars; it was called historical revisionism.

Benny Morris has now written another book based on research on Arab attitudes to Zionism and Israel in the years leading up to the 1948 war. In it he describes the Arabs as being unwilling to compromise and bent on Israel’s destruction. As an example, Morris quotes a declaration from scholars at the prestigious Moslem university Al Azhar in Cairo, made four days after the UN decided to establish a Jewish and an Arab state in the British Palestine Mandate. The declaration proclaimed a "worldwide jihad in defense of Arab Palestine."

Morris is today pessimistic regarding solution to the conflict. "Figures like Hamas’ Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Meshaal, Hizbullah’s Hassan Nasrallah and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – are true believers who are convinced it is Allah’s command and every Muslim’s duty to extirpate the ‘Zionist entity’ from the sacred soil of the Middle East." Although he does not consider himself a "hawk," Morris’ last book will probably be much more quoted on the political right than by the "doves" on the left.



3. MEDIA WATCHDOG ACQUITTED OF AL-DURA FOOTAGE LIBEL

The TV station France 2 lost the libel case against Jewish activist Philippe Karsenty who claimed that the channel's report of a 12-year-old Palestinian-Arab boy's death in 2000 was "pure fiction", Israel Insider reports. France 2 showed on September 30, 2000 a report that they claimed showed the death of Mohammed al-Dura amid gunfire between Israeli forces and Palestinian Arab terrorists. The incident was used worldwide to smear IDF, inciting further violence and fuelling what is known as the Second Intifada. The IDF initially accepted responsibility for the incident, but after more extensive investigation of the matter retracted the admission of responsibility. Evidence subsequently uncovered indicated that the young boy was either killed by the Palestinian Arabs or never killed at all. The body was never exhumed or even located.

Karsenty had claimed that France 2 had faked the footage, calling the report "a hoax." France 2 sued Karsenty for libel and in the first round won. Karsenty appealed that verdict and was acquitted. "The verdict means we have the right to say France 2 broadcasted a fake news report , that [al-Dura's shooting] was a staged hoax and that they duped everybody – without being sued," Karsenity told to JPost.



4. QUARRY FOR THE TEMPLE MOUNT CONSTRUCTION UNCOVERED

JPost writes that according to the Israel Antiquities Authority archaeologists have discovered a Second Temple period quarry. The discovery was made in Jerusalem's religious Sanhedria neighbourhood during a routine "salvage excavation" ahead of the construction of a private house. The quarry is believed to be one of those used to build walls around the Second Temple because the size of the stones matches those at the Western Wall. The largest of the stones found at the quarry measures 0.69 X 0.94 X 1.65 meters. Some of the stones were apparently ready for extraction but were left in place. The stones were dated by pottery found at the site.

Last year, archaeologists unearthed another ancient quarry from the Second Temple period in the Ramat Shlomo neighbourhood of Jerusalem. That quarry supplied enormous high quality stones (up to 8 meters long) for the construction of the Temple Mount.



5. BRIEFS

According to Israeli military officials that have been monitoring the progress of PA police forces who were trained and equipped by the US, are proving powerless against the terrorist infrastructures, Israel Today writes. Hundreds of Palestinian police have been sent over the past few weeks to arrest small groups of terrorists, but have retreated after coming under fire. In the most embarrassing case, some 300 PA policemen were repelled by only 13 terrorists. The PA police force in Nablus had to seek assistance from Israeli army, which quickly stormed the terrorist stronghold. "I do not know how they can handle security without Israel backing them," said one of the Israeli military officials. The land-for-peace process is based on the premise that the Palestinian Arabs can and will impose security control over territories surrendered to them by Israel and prevent anti-Israel terrorist violence emanating from a Palestinian state…

A top Palestinian Arab journalist admitted last week in an article in PA daily Al Ayyam that it is the Arab world, and not Israel, that is to blame for the so-called "refugee crisis", Arutz Sheva writes. He writes that during "the first war between Arabs and Israel…the "Arab salvation Army" came and told the Arab inhabitants: "We have come to you in order to liquidate the Zionists and their state. Leave your houses and villages, you will return to them in a few days safely. Leave them so we can fulfill our mission (destroy Israel) in the best way and so you won't be hurt." It became clear already then, when it was too late, that the support of the Arab states (against Israel) was a big illusion." This admission of the original reason and responsibility for the refugee issue places a big question mark on one of PA’s main demands in negotiations with Israel; the "right of return for refugees."

Tel Aviv municipality and the Israel Taxi drivers association have agreed on the environment-friendly plan of switching 5,000 city cabs to hybrid vehicles, Ynet News reports. Hybrid vehicles use a combination petrol-electric motor that emits a relatively low amount of pollutants. There are currently two types of hybrids marketed in Israel- the Honda Civic hybrid and Toyota Prius. Acquiring hybrid vehicles is also economically beneficial, since the prices of fuel continue to rise and the hybrids use less fuel. Besides that, the sales tax on the hybrids is lower…



6. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: 1912

The ultra orthodox organization World Agudat Israel is established in Katowice with the aim of perpetuating authentic Judaism in issues facing Jews as individuals and as a nation. The organization engages mainly in education and politics and receives a large following among Hasidic Jews. The Aguda spreads to different nations and engages itself politically in the parliament of the State of Israel. Agudat Israel is today led by rabbis who make the political decisions. But the organization also has a branch in the US, and its policy decisions are made by a Council of Sages with representatives from both nations.


SUPPORT WORD OF LIFE ISRAEL

Israel needs a voice. Amidst a sea of biased and often incorrect news reporting, Israel Report speaks for Israel's case. You can strengthen this voice by supporting Israel Report's goal of spreading objective and truthful information from Israel.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Study Finds Big Social Factor in Quitting Smoking

For years, smokers have been exhorted to take the initiative and quit: use a nicotine patch, chew nicotine gum, take a prescription medication that can help, call a help line, just say no. But a new study finds that stopping is seldom an individual decision.

Smokers tend to quit in groups, the study finds, which means smoking cessation programs should work best if they focus on groups rather than individuals. It also means that people may help many more than just themselves by quitting: quitting can have a ripple effect prompting an entire social network to break the habit.

The study, by Dr. Nicholas Christakis of Harvard Medical School and James Fowler of the University of California, San Diego, followed thousands of smokers and nonsmokers for 32 years, from 1971 until 2003, studying them as part of a large network of relatives, co-workers, neighbors, friends and friends of friends.

It was a time when the percentage of adult smokers in the United States fell to 21 percent from 45 percent. As the investigators watched the smokers and their social networks, they saw what they said was a striking effect — smokers had formed little social clusters and, as the years went by, entire clusters of smokers were stopping en masse. So were clusters of clusters that were only loosely connected.

Dr. Christakis described watching the vanishing clusters as like lying on your back in a field, looking up at stars that were burning out. “It’s not like one little star turning off at a time,” he said. “Whole constellations are blinking off at once.”

As cluster after cluster of smokers disappeared, those that remained were pushed to the margins of society, isolated, with fewer friends, fewer social connections. “Smokers used to be the center of the party,” Dr. Fowler said, “but now they’ve become wallflowers.”

“We’ve known smoking was bad for your physical health,” he said. “But this shows it also is bad for your social health.”

Smokers, he said, “are likely to drive friends away.”

Their paper is to be published Thursday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

“There is an essential public health message,” said Richard Suzman, director of the office of behavioral and social research at the National Institute on Aging, which financed the study.

“Obviously, people have to take responsibility for their behavior,” Mr. Suzman said. But a social environment, he added, “can just overpower free will.”

With smoking, that can be a good thing, researchers noted.

But there also is a sad side. As Dr. Steven Schroeder of the University of California, San Francisco, pointed out in an editorial accompanying the paper, “a risk of the marginalization of smoking is that it further isolates the group of people with the highest rate of smoking — persons with mental illness, problems with substance abuse, or both.”

These are people, Dr. Schroeder notes, who already suffer from being stigmatized.

It is not clear how to resolve that problem, Dr. Fowler said. “What we are seeing is that there is a fundamental trade-off to having a campaign to really change people’s behavior,” he said.

Dr. Christakis and Dr. Fowler published a similar study last year on obesity, asking about the rise of a health problem.

The new study also looked at smoking initiation but, because many more adults were stopping smoking than starting in the years of the study, its main focus was on cessation. Still, Dr. Christakis said, smoking initiation followed the same patterns as cessation: people started and stopped smoking in groups.

Such studies of social networks and behavior like smoking are extremely difficult because what is needed is detailed information on people’s behavior and the behavior of their family, their relatives, their neighbors and co-workers, their friends and their friends of friends. Dr. Christakis and Dr. Fowler discovered one data set that had what they needed but, they and others say, there may not be any others.

The data were from the federal Framingham Heart Study. It was initiated after World War II to follow the population of Framingham, Mass., in order to understand the causes and consequences of heart disease. Researchers regularly examined the study participants, weighing them, doing medical exams, asking them whether they smoked. In order to keep track of the subjects over the years, even if they moved away, the investigators asked for the names and contact information of close friends, co-workers and neighbors.

That meant, though, that the data set also contained all the information that would be needed for an analysis of social networks and the spread of obesity or, in this case, for an analysis of social networks and the decline in smoking, Dr. Christakis and Dr. Fowler realized.

The researchers focused on 5,124 people in the Framingham study who had 53,228 friends, relatives and neighbors as part of their social networks.

They noticed that, on average, smokers clustered in groups of three. Over the years, as fewer and fewer Americans smoked, the number of clusters declined but the clusters that remained stayed the same size, which meant that smokers were not stopping smoking one by one. They were stopping in groups.

Education also played a role. Those with more education were more highly influenced by their friends, and their friends were more likely to influence them. And some social contacts were more influential than others. A spouse’s quitting was more powerful than a friend’s, and a friend’s quitting was more powerful than a sibling’s. If someone you name as a friend quits, that has more of an effect than if someone who names you as their friend quits. Co-workers had an influence only in small firms where everyone knew one another. The effects were greater among casual smokers than heavy smokers.

The study and the obesity study that preceded it, said Duncan Watts, principal research scientist at Yahoo! Research in New York, provide a new view of society.

“We tend to think of individuals as atomized units, and we think of policies as good or bad for individuals,” Dr. Watts said. “This reminds us that we are all connected to each other, and when we do something to one person, there are spillover effects.”

And, he added, when the same sort of effects show up in the spread of obesity as in the decline of smoking, that should be a signal.

“Something very powerful is going on here,” Dr. Watts said.

-

By GINA KOLATA
May 22, 2008


Monday, May 19, 2008

Homosexuality Stats

In regards to homosexuality statistics, below are some statistics which reveal the nature of homosexuality:


  • Dr. Neil Whitehead and Briar Whitehead state regarding various cultures: "If homosexuality were significantly influenced by genes, it would appear in every culture, but in twenty-nine of seventy-nine cultures surveyed by Ford and Beach in 1952, homosexuality was rare or absent."[1]


  • Dr. Tahir I. Jaz, M.D., Winnipeg, Canada states: "The increasing claims of being "born that way" parallels the rising political activism of homosexual organisations, who politicise the issue of homosexual origins . In the 1970s, approximately ten percent of homosexuals claimed to be "born homosexual" according to a large scale survey....However, in a survey in the 1980s, with the homosexual rights movement increasingly becoming active, thirty-five percent claimed to be born that way.[2]


  • In 1980 a study was published in the American Journal of Psychiatry which stated that eleven former homosexual men became heterosexuals "without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy" through their participation in a Pentecostal church.[3]


  • In regards to homosexual couples and domestic violence, a recent study by the Canadian government states that "violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with heterosexual couples".[4] Also, according the American College of Pediatricians who cite several studies, "Violence among homosexual partners is two to three times more common than among married heterosexual couples."[5]


  • Regarding homosexuality and promiscuity, in 2004 the Baptist Press reported the following: "A new study by a group of University of Chicago researchers reveals a high level of promiscuity and unhealthy behavior among that city's homosexual male population. According to the researchers, 42.9 percent of homosexual men in Chicago's Shoreland area have had more than 60 sexual partners, while an additional 18.4 percent have had between 31 and 60 partners...As a result, 55.1 percent of homosexual males in Shoreland -- known as Chicago's "gay center" -- have at least one sexually transmitted disease, researchers said."[6]


In September of 2006, the Agape Press reported the following:

A survey by The Advocate, a homosexual magazine, revealed that promiscuity is a reality among homosexuals. The poll found that 20 percent of homosexuals said they had had 51-300 different sex partners in their lifetime, with an additional 8 percent having had more than 300.

Unprotected homosexual sex is also a concern among health professionals. A survey in Ireland by the Gay Men's Health Project found that almost half of homosexuals said they were having unprotected sex....

The fact that many homosexuals appear to live their lives in sexual overdrive does not seem to concern leaders in the movement. In an editorial from the same issue (August 15) in which the survey results were published, The Advocate said: "[Homosexuals] have been proud leaders in the sexual revolution that started in the 1960s, and we have rejected attempts by conservatives to demonize that part of who we are."[7]


In November of 2007 the news organization One News Now reported the following regarding Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth remarks about the spead of AIDS via male homosexual promiscuity and a conference on AIDS featuring Pastor Rick Warren and Senator Hillary Clinton:

Pro-family activist Peter LaBarbera says he shares Pastor Warren's desire to fight the spread of HIV/AIDS but wonders what solutions a politician who is an ardent supporter of the homosexual agenda has to offer in combating the disease. "He says that he's a co-belligerent with people who he disagrees with on other issues," notes LaBarbera, "[so] I guess the question would be: does he disagree strongly with Hillary Clinton's approach to homosexuality and even the AIDS crisis?"

Although he admits he is skeptical of what solutions a defender of the homosexual lifestyle like Clinton has to offer churches for fighting the HIV/AIDS crisis, the activist is calling on Warren and Clinton to use the upcoming summit to tackle the problem of homosexual promiscuity, which often results in HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

"We have homosexual bath houses operating in major cities across this nation," LaBarbera notes. "These are places where men go for anonymous sexual liaisons with other men. They're bringing the HIV virus back to innocent women, because some of these men do not identify as 'gay' and they're even married. So what about that aspect of the AIDS crisis?"[8]


In 2003, LifeSite reported the following regarding a Amsterdam study:

As Canada and several U.S. states move toward the legalization of so-called homosexual "marriage," a new study has found that homosexual partnerships last, on average, only one-and-a-half years.

The study is based on the health records of young Dutch homosexuals by Dr. Maria Xiridou of the Amsterdam Municipal Health Service and published in the May issue of the journal AIDS. It also found that men in homosexual relationships have an average of eight partners a year outside their main partnership, adding more evidence to the "stereotype" that homosexuals tend to be promiscuous.[9][10]


  • Regarding Homosexuality and health, of newly diagnosed HIV infections in the United States during the year 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that about 63% were among men who were infected through sexual contact with other men.[11]


  • A 1997 CDC report found that among homosexuals who had unprotected anal intercourse and multiple sexual partners, 68 percent were entirely unaware of the HIV status of their partners.[12]


  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated the following regarding syphilis in the United States: "While surveillance data are not available by risk behavior, a separate CDC analysis suggests that approximately 64 percent of all adult P&S syphilis cases in 2004 were among men who have sex with men, up from an estimated 5 percent in 1999...."[13]


  • The CDC reported the following regarding the United States and homosexuality: "CDC conducted sentinel surveillance in 28 cities and found the proportion of cases resistant to fluoroquinolone antibiotics (a first-line treatment for gonorrhea) increased from 4.1 percent in 2003 to 6.8 percent in 2004. Resistance is especially worrisome in men who have sex with men, where it was eight times higher than among heterosexuals (23.8 percent vs. 2.9 percent)."[14]


  • In 2006, The Medical Journal of Australia stated the following: "High rates of intestinal parasitism are found in MSM [men who have sex with men] throughout the world."[15]


  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) both Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B disproportionately affects men who have sex with men (MSM).[16][17]


  • Lymphogranuloma venereum is a sexually transmitted disease that mainly infects the lymphatics.[18] According to the recent medical literature, there have been recent outbreaks of lymphogranuloma venereum in Europe and North America and the outbreaks have been limited to the homosexual community.


  • In June of 2004, the journal Nursing Clinics of North America reported the following: "One of the more pressing issues for gay men is anal carcinoma. Several recent studies have indicated the rate of anal dysplasia to be increasing in men with and without HIV. Ninety percent of men with HIV have the human papiloma virus (HPV), while 65% of men without HIV have HPV. HVP type 16 is the most troublesome for developing cancer and is found in a significant portion of gay men.[19]


  • In 2007 the Los Angeles Times reported the frequency of methamphetamine use is twenty times greater among homosexuals than in the general population.[20]


  • The recent medical literature states the homosexual men and lesbians in the United States have significantly higher rates of cigarrete smoking than heterosexuals.[21][22]


A June 2004 , Canadian Community Health Survey of 83,000 people reported the following:

The results indicate that, for some health-related measures, there are important differences between the heterosexual population and the gay, lesbian and bisexual population.

Among individuals aged 18 to 59, for example, 21.8% of homosexuals and bisexuals reported that they had an unmet health care need in 2003, nearly twice the proportion of heterosexuals (12.7%). Homosexuals and bisexuals are more likely than heterosexuals to find life stressful.

In addition, 31.4% of homosexuals and bisexuals reported that they were physically active in 2003, compared with 25.4% of heterosexuals.[23][24]


  • There have been a notable number of incidents involving the issue of homosexuality and the suppresion of religious liberty in regards to dissent and the objectionableness of homosexuality. For example, in October of 2001, a 69 year old street preacher named Harry Hammond from Bournemouth, England was subjected to assault by an angry crowd of 40 people while he proclaimed his Christian views in the town center which included a call to repentance in respect to homosexuality.[25] Mr. Hammond was arrested, prosecuted and fined but no arrests were made in respect to those who assaulted him.[26] Appeals to overturn the verdict, which included an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, were dismissed. [27]


Survey Finds Men Seek to Leave Homosexual Lifestyle to Heal Emotional Pain

VIRGINIA, July 13, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Why would anyone with homosexual attractions try to "go straight"? According to conventional wisdom, the answer is inevitably "internalized homophobia" or societal pressure.

But a new survey of almost 200 same-sex-attracted men who are pursuing change paints a very different picture: Out of 18 possible motivations listed in the survey, outside pressure was the least frequently cited motivating factor reported by the 189 survey respondents.

The most frequently cited motivation was a desire to heal emotional hurts that respondents believe contributed to their same-sex attractions (SSA) to begin with.

The desire to heal emotional pain was cited as a major motivator by 77% of respondents, compared to 22% who identified "outside pressure" as a major motivator. In fact, just 3% identified outside pressure as one of the three main reasons they were seeking change.

The survey was conducted by People Can Change, a non-profit, non-religious self-help organization of men who have overcome unwanted homosexual attractions and who now support others who seek similar change.

On average, each respondent identified 14 of the 18 factors as contributing to their desire to change. Other factors identified as major motivators include:

- personal spirituality - 68%
- desire for wife and children - 66%
- religious teachings - 63%
- desire for nonsexual male friendships - 63%
- conscience - 63%
- expectation of unhappiness in gay life - 63%.

Richard Wyler, a professional life coach who is the founder and executive director of People Can Change, summarized, "This survey indicates that same-sex- attracted men who seek change may be less influenced by outside pressure or shame than is generally assumed. Rather, they are more often motivated by their personal spirituality, deeply held values and beliefs, a desire to have a family, and a desire to heal emotional pain."

The current survey didn't explore perceived "root causes," but a 2004 survey by People Can Change found that men seeking to overcome SSA most frequently perceived the root causes of their own attractions to be:

- a history of father-son relationship problems,
- a history of problems relating with male peers,
- unhealthy mother-son relationships,
- a history of sexual abuse, and
- individual personality traits.


References
  1. My Genes Made Me Do it - a scientific look at sexual orientation by Dr Neil Whitehead and Briar Whitehead - Chapter 6
  2. http://www.flyfishingdevon.co.uk/salmon/year2/hormones/tahir.htm
  3. E.M. Pattison and M.L. Pattison, "'Ex-Gays': Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals," American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 137, pp. 1553-1562, 1980
  4. 2004 General Social Survey, Statistics Canada, Canada's National Statistical Agency, July 7, 2005
  5. http://www.acpeds.org/?CONTEXT=art&cat=22&art=50
  6. Baptist Press, MARRIAGE DIGEST: New study: Homosexual men prone to promiscuity by Michael Foust (Posted on Jan 16, 2004)
  7. http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/9/152006g.asp
  8. http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/11/warren_clinton_urged_to_tackle.php
  9. Homosexual Unions Last Only 1.5 Years, Says New Study
  10. AIDS. 17(7):1029-1038, May 2, 2003
  11. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5424a2.htm
  12. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48542
  13. http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r051108.htm
  14. http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r051108.htm
  15. Letter to the editor - Locally acquired infection with Entamoeba histolytica in men who have sex with men in Australia, Damien J Stark, Rashmi Fotedar, John T Ellis and John L Harkness, MJA 2006; 185 (8): 417
  16. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/msm/hav_msm_fact.htm
  17. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/msm/hbv_msm_fact.htm
  18. http://www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic304.htm
  19. Nursing Clinics of North America North Am. 2004 Jun;39(2):404
  20. More Gay Men Using Meth, Study Finds, by R. Rosenblatt, Los Angeles Times, April 11, p. B6.
  21. Cigarette smoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: how serious a problem? (United States), Cancer Causes & Control, 2004 Oct;15(8):797-803
  22. Gay/Lesbian sexual orientation increases risk for cigarette smoking and heavy drinking among members of a large Northern California health plan, BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 3;6:241
  23. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040615/d040615b.htm
  24. http://www.saltshakers.org.au/html/P/9/B/288/
  25. http://www.christian.org.uk/rel_liberties/cases/harry_hammond.htm
  26. http://www.christian.org.uk/rel_liberties/cases/harry_hammond.htm
  27. http://www.christian.org.uk/rel_liberties/cases/harry_hammond.htm
  28. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_4_35/ai_53390356/pg_6
  29. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_4_35/ai_53390356/pg_8
  30. http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5083
  31. http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/two.php
  32. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040615/d040615b.htm
  33. http://www.saltshakers.org.au/html/P/9/B/288/
  34. http://www.leaderu.com/marco/special/spc11b.html
  35. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49958
  36. http://americansfortruth.com/news/conservapedia-examines-gay-bowel-syndrome-homosexual-activists-lobby-against-term.html
  37. http://www.cwfa.org/articles/959/CWA/family/index.htm

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Supplement Your Knowledge of Vitamin D

Here's the Scoop on Vitamin D, From Fun in the Sun to the Debate Over Dosage


May 19, 2008 -- The big news hit last week: Women who are deficient in vitamin D when they get breast cancer have a much higher chance of dying from their cancer.

That's surprising news. But just as surprising is the fact that many women -- and many men -- are deficient in vitamin D or have insufficient blood levels of this important vitamin.

How many? Data suggest many of us don't get the vitamin D we need. For example, a 2007 study of childbearing women in the Northern U.S. found insufficient vitamin D levels in 54% of black women and in 42% of white women.

WebMD's FAQ addresses these questions:

  • Why do I need vitamin D?
  • How can I get enough vitamin D?
  • Which foods contain vitamin D?
  • How much vitamin D do I need?
  • Can I get too much vitamin D?
  • What kind of vitamin D is best?
  • Does vitamin D interact with other medications?

Why do I need vitamin D?

Your body must have vitamin D to absorb calcium and promote bone growth. Too little vitamin D results in soft bones in children (rickets) and fragile, misshapen bones in adults (osteomalacia). You also need vitamin D for other important body functions.

Vitamin D deficiency has now been linked to breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, heart disease, depression, weight gain, and other maladies. These studies show that people with higher levels of vitamin D have a lower risk of disease, although they do not definitively prove that lack of vitamin D causes disease -- or that vitamin D supplements would lower risk.

The Vitamin D Council -- a scientist-led group promoting vitamin D deficiency awareness -- suggests vitamin D treatment might be found helpful in treating or preventing autism, autoimmune disease, cancer, chronic pain, depression, diabetes, heart disease, hyperparathyroidism, high blood pressure, flu, neuromuscular diseases, and osteoporosis. However, there have been no definitive clinical trials.

The best known benefit of vitamin D is its role in helping calcium build strong bones. But that's far from the whole story. Vitamin D helps regulate the immune system and the neuromuscular system. Vitamin D also plays major roles in the life cycle of human cells.

Vitamin D is so important that your body makes it by itself -- but only after skin exposure to sufficient sunlight. This is a problem for people in northern climates. In the U.S., only people who live south of a line drawn from Los Angeles to Columbia, S.C., get enough sunlight for vitamin D production throughout the year.

Dark skin absorbs less sunlight, so people with dark skin do not get as much vitamin D from sun exposure as do light-skinned people. This is a particular problem for African-Americans in the northern U.S.

How can I get enough vitamin D?

Five to 30 minutes of sun exposure to the face, legs, or back -- without sunscreen -- at least twice a week should give you plenty of vitamin D.

But this much direct sun exposure might also expose you to potentially dangerous levels of cancer-causing UV radiation. And unless you live in the South or Southwest, you probably don't get enough sunlight during the winter months.

It's probably a better idea to get vitamin D from foods or from supplements.

Which foods contain vitamin D?

Surprisingly few foods contain vitamin D -- unless it's added to the food.

Food sources of vitamin D include:

  • Cod liver oil
  • Salmon
  • Mackerel
  • Tuna or sardines canned in oil
  • Milk, regardless of whether it's whole, nonfat, or reduced fat
  • Egg yolks
  • Beef or calf liver
  • Cheese

Nearly all milk in the U.S. is fortified with vitamin D. So are many brands of orange juice, yogurt, margarine, and ready-to-eat breakfast cereals.

How much vitamin D do I need?

The current recommended daily dose of vitamin D is 200 IU for people up to age 50, 400 IU for people aged 51 to 70, and 600 IU for people over age 70.

That's not enough, Boston University vitamin D expert Michael Holick, MD, PhD, tells WebMD. Holick recommends a dose of 1,000 IU a day of vitamin D for both infants and adults -- unless they're getting plenty of safe sun exposure.

In 2008, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that breastfed infants receive 400 IU of vitamin D every day until they are weaned and drink at least 1 liter of vitamin D-fortified formula or whole milk each day. The AAP also recommends 400 IU/day of vitamin D for children and teens who drink less than a liter of vitamin D-fortified milk per day.

The Vitamin D Council recommends that healthy adults take 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily -- more if they get little or no sun exposure.

A simple blood test -- the 25(OH)D or calcidiol test -- can tell your doctor whether your vitamin D level is low. The Vitamin D Council recommends that 25(OH)D levels be between 40 and 65 ng/mL. The U.S. National Institutes of health notes that 25(OH)D levels over 30 ng/mL are optimal, and that there is "insufficient data" to support recommendations for higher levels.

Can I get too much vitamin D?

Too much of any good thing is a bad thing. Too much vitamin D can cause nausea, constipation, confusion, abnormal heart rhythm, and even kidney stones.

It's nearly impossible to get too much vitamin D from sunlight or from foods (unless you take way too much cod liver oil). Nearly all vitamin D overdoses come from supplements.

Can I get too much vitamin D? continued...

How much vitamin D is too much? That's controversial. According to the National Institutes of Health, the maximum upper limit for vitamin D is 25 micrograms (1,000 IU) for children up to age 12 months and 50 micrograms (2,000 IU) for everyone else.

But some recent studies suggest that healthy adults can tolerate more than 10,000 IU of vitamin D per day. John Jacob Cannell, MD, executive director of The Vitamin D Council, notes that the skin makes 10,000 IU of vitamin D after 30 minutes of full-body sun exposure. He suggests that 10,000 IU of vitamin D is not toxic.

According to the National Institutes of Health, 25(OH)D levels that are consistently over 200 ng/mL are "potentially toxic."

What kind of vitamin D is best?

The recommended form of vitamin D is vitamin D3 or cholecalciferol. This is the natural form of vitamin D that your body makes from sunlight. Supplements are made from the fat of lambs' wool.

Many supplements contain vitamin D as vitamin D2 or calciferol. It's derived from irradiated fungus. Because this is not the form of vitamin D naturally made by your body, WebMD nutritionist Kathleen M. Zelman, MPH, RD, recommends using the D3 form for those taking vitamin D supplements.

Because of its potency, different forms of vitamin D are used in prescription medications. If you have a prescription for one of these medications, do not switch to another form of vitamin D without checking with your doctor.

Does vitamin D interact with other medications?

Yes. Steroid medications such as prednisone can interfere with vitamin D metabolism. If you take steroid drugs regularly, discuss vitamin D with your doctor.

The weight loss drug orlistat -- brand names include Xenical and Alli -- may cut absorption of vitamin D. So does the cholesterol-lowering drug cholestyramine (sold as Questran, LoCholest, and Prevalite). People taking these drugs should discuss vitamin intake with their doctors.

The seizure drugs phenobarbitol and Dilantin (phenytoin), affect vitamin D metabolism and affect calcium absorption.



References

WebMD Medical News: " Vitamin D Deficiency Worsens Breast Cancer?"

WebMD Feature: " Are You Getting Enough Vitamin D?"

WebMD Medical News: " Vitamin D Deficiency May Hurt Heart."

WebMD Medical News: " Many Depressed Older Adults Lack Vitamin D."

WebMD Medical News: " Calcium/Vitamin D Slows Weight Gain."

WebMD Medical News: " Vitamin D Fights Colon Cancer."

WebMD Medical News: " Vitamin D Compounds May Fight Prostate Cancer."

National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Vitamin D, updated May 16, 2008.

The Vitamin D Council web site.

Detroit Conference Spotlights Powerful Miracles

Detroit is Michigan’s largest city, a major port city on the Detroit River, and is known around the world for its automobile industry and legendary music. Its panoramic waterfront, framed by distinctive Art Deco buildings, form a recognizable skyline that features the General Motors Renaissance Center, a group of seven interconnected skyscrapers. The central tower, the Detroit Marriott Renaissance Center which soars 73 floors above the Detroit River, is both Michigan’s tallest building and also the tallest all-hotel skyscraper in the Western Hemisphere. Recently, the Detroit Marriott Renaissance was also home to the exciting Benny Hinn Ministries Fire Conference, featured on this life-changing broadcast.

">http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/mplayer/en/nsmp2inf.cab#Version=6,4,7,1112">
http://www.bennyhinn.org/media/2008-5-19.asx" />





http://www.bennyhinn.org/media/2008-5-19.asx" name="MediaPlayer" width="450" height="411" showcontrols="true" autostart="true" enableContextMenu="true" stretchToFit="true">

Friday, May 16, 2008

The Blessed Life

I’ve known some believers with a bad case of the “gimmes.” They’ve been taught that God’s job is to give them everything they want. “God, give me this, and God, give me that.” But when the “gimmes” don’t provide all the stuff to which they think they’re entitled, they start running around looking for some new seminar or self-help book or some popular quick-fix artist to tell them how to get back on God’s gravy train.

If you really want blessings, you need to be the giver. Jesus said, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35, NKJV). If you understand the spirit of giving, serving one another will not be a problem for you. It’s the mark of greatness in God’s kingdom.

Our great King will not allow anyone who has started maturing in the faith to live like a baby on a diet of milk. He won’t allow us to continue indefinitely as mere babes in the Word. He expects us to grow, to multiply and to advance in the kingdom.

He demands that we grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, so that He might be glorified in His kingdom. Do you live for the glory of God? Are you seeking His kingdom and His righteousness so that He may one day lavish His abundance upon you? It’s the only treasure that really matters.

—Kingsley Fletcher

Lord, forgive me for living the Christian life simply for what I can get from You. Grant me the maturity to rise above selfishness and become a true giver.

Kingsley Fletcher, I Have Seen the Kingdom (1998), 118–119.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Israel Report - 16 May 2008

THIS WEEK'S NEWS:
1. IRANIAN ROCKET LANDS IN ASHKELON AS BUSH ARRIVES
2. A POLISH HOLOCAUST HEROINE DIES AT 98
3. BRIEFS
4. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: JANUARY 1949



* * * * * * * * * * * *

1. IRANIAN-MADE ROCKET LANDS IN ASHKELON AS BUSH ARRIVES

On Wednesday afternoon, President George Bush, together with his wife Laura and a large staff, landed on Ben Gurion Airport outside Tel Aviv to join in the celebrations of Israel’s 60th anniversary. The two-day visit also included several meetings with Israeli leaders, a visit to King Herod’s summer palace at Masada, as well as a speech in the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset.

A few hours after Bush’s arrival, terrorists in Gaza sent a Grad-rocket towards Ashkelon. The rocket landed in a shopping mall, broke through the roof and injured 15 persons, four of them seriously. The rocket was, as usual, aimed at civilian targets, but was not produced in Gaza as is normal for the Kassam rockets; it was produced in Iran. According to reports, the terror organization Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine launched the attack after having smuggled the rocket into Gaza via Egypt. Iranian-sponsored terrorists already have a base in Lebanon and are now building up one in Gaza.

During his stay, Bush referred to the ongoing terrorism and the need to stand strong against Hamas which rules Gaza. The President said that while standing in peace "we must understand the realities of the world we live in...and stand strong in the face of those who murder the innocent to achieve their objectives." He assured Israel that in spite of suggestions that all problems in the Middle East would be solved should the US break ties with Israel, this is not an option: "When you [Israel] confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because America stands with you."

In the days leading up to the visit, Israeli media reported of a new US approach to the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority (PA). The idea is to agree upon the borders of a supposed Palestinian state before everything else. The Bush administration hopes this will help solve the other issues. To this Prime Minister Ehud Olmert added that he wants the Jerusalem issue, which is the most controversial, to be the last topic to be negotiated. If this procedure is adopted, the long-standing principle "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed" will be abandoned. However, it might help the Olmert government remain in their seats somewhat longer.

Comment:
Bush arrives in Israel to celebrate Israel’s 60th anniversary. At the same time many Israelis, including political and military leaders, see Israel’s security situation as worse than in many decades. When considering the developments of just the last week or so, these people find little reason for optimism. The following is a list of events that are not of equal importance, but combined they all add to the insecurity that many Israelis experience.

One week ago David Kedoshim was killed by a rocket while working his garden. This week a 70 year old lady was killed by a rocket as she entered the house of her friends, and on Wednesday another rocket slammed into a mall injuring 15 people. Hamas, which is responsible for the rocket launches, asks for a cease-fire while admitting they will use it to prepare for the next strike against Israel.

Furthermore, Chairman of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, signed a declaration where he vows to continue "the struggle" until all refugees are permitted to return (a common way of saying terrorism will continue until Israel is destroyed as a Jewish state); the PA court system sentenced one of their policemen to death because he performed duties the PA has obligated themselves to in the Oslo Agreement; a report compiled by the Palestinian Media Watch revealed that the PA identifies and sympathizes with countries and entities that are sworn enemies of Israel and the US such as North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and Hizb’Allah. The report also revealed that PA media is filled with hatred and disdain for the US.

In Egypt, which has a peace treaty with Israel, the Egyptian Minister of Culture said he would burn Israeli books if he came across such books in Egyptian libraries (see below); in Lebanon, Hizb’Allah is flexing their muscles and might easily take control – something that in effect would bring Iran to the borders of Israel. And in close-to-nuclear Iran, Ahmadinejad continued his diatribe against Israel saying it is futile to celebrate a 60th birthday for "something that is already dead."

Based on the above, President Bush, Ehud Olmert and others who are involved in the peace negotiations might need to ask themselves: Are the Arabs really ready to make peace with Israel? Yes, they are engaged in negotiations, and yes, they are making nice declarations, but how does this correspond with the above observations? Perhaps time has come for some deeper reflection on the essence and the root of the conflict instead of only dealing with its symptoms.

There are those who doubt Israel’s intentions as well. These would do well to study the Israeli society. As a functioning democracy, Israel is transparent and self-critical. Double-mindedness and hidden agendas are doomed to be exposed. Israeli efforts towards peace are genuine and strong - So is their desire to survive!



2. A POLISH HOLOCAUST HEROINE DIES AT 98

Irena Sendler, a Polish woman who saved 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto, died Monday morning at the age of 98, Ynet News writes. Prior to the war, Sendler had worked with Warsaw's poor Jewish families. At the end of 1942, she joined the anti-Nazi resistance movement of Poles helping Jews. Taking grave risks, she began to smuggle Jewish infants and children out of the ghetto, carrying them out in boxes, suitcases and trolleys. Her team of some 20 people saved 2,500 children between October 1940 and April 1943, when the Nazis burned the ghetto.

In order to assure that the rescued Jewish children would be able to return to their own after the war, Irena wrote their names and locations on slips of paper, which were eventually hidden in jars and buried. After the war, she dug up the jars and began an attempt to find the children and return them to living parents. However, almost all the children's parents had died at the Treblinka extermination camp.

Sendler was one of the first people honored by the Israeli Yad VaShem Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem with the title "Righteous Among the Nations". In addition to this she has received many other honorable awards. Sendler herself has said: "Every child saved with my help and the help of all the wonderful secret messengers, who today are no longer living, is the justification of my existence on this earth and not a title of glory."



3. BRIEFS

In a conference that took place in the Egyptian Parliament last week, Egyptian Culture Minister Farouk Hosni said that he "would burn Israeli books himself if found in Egyptian libraries," Ynet News reports. Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs presented a severe protest to the Egyptian ambassador in Israel. The anger in Israel over Hosni's statement is especially emphasized due to the fact that he is Egypt's candidate for the UNESCO position, as the United Nation's education, science and cultural secretary-general. Hosni is considered one of the strongest opposition leaders in the Egyptian government to stand against normalization with Israel. In the past, he accused Israel of trying to steal Egyptian culture…

According to the poll conducted among Palestinian Arabs by an independent think tank, Arab World for Research and Development, the approval rating of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has dropped considerably since January. He would have trouble winning if elections were held now. The poll also revealed that Marwan Barghouti is by far the most popular Palestinian Arab leader. Barghouti, a former leader of the youth movement within Abbas' Fatah party, is currently serving five life sentences in prison for his involvement in terror attacks.

A Hamas children's television program told its viewers that Tel Aviv, built by Jews, actually belonged to Arabs before and is called Tel Al-Rabi instead, MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) reports. In a dialogue between a "bunny" and "grandpa", the grandpa is telling how he used to live in "Tel Al-Rabi" and he blames that "the Zionists and Jews Hebraicized the name to Tel-Aviv". Moreover, he blames the Jews for "Hebraicizing" the names of several other modern Jewish cities, like Ashdod, Ashkelon and Beer Sheva…

On Tuesday a six-day international design workshop in architecture opened at Naharaym, Haaretz writes. The purpose of the workshop is to discuss the establishment of Jordan River Peace Park. It is supposed to be a trans-border protected area to where both Israelis and Jordanians will be able to enter from either side without need for a visa. The site is 10 kilometers south from the southern tip of Lake Kinneret (the Sea of Galilee). The park area will include the former Ruthenberg Hydroelectric power station and the Three Bridges Site – the still extant 2,000 year old Roman Bridge, an Ottoman railway bridge and a British mandate road bridge over the Jordan.

According to the new research by Israeli scientists, learning a second or third language in childhood may protect one's brain against the effects of aging later in life, Israel21c reports. Dr. Gitit Kave, a clinical neuron-psychologist from Herczeg Institute on Aging at Tel Aviv University discovered while comparing bilingual, trilingual and multilingual senior citizens that the more languages the person spoke, the better his cognitive state was. Kave's findings are likely to add fuel to the controversy about whether or not parents should introduce their young children to a second language. "In my professional opinion, learning a new language can only do good things", she says. "Other languages are good for you at any age. They allow for a flexibility of thought and a channel for understanding another culture better, as well as your own."



4. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: JANUARY 1949

Israel holds elections for the First Knesset. Of the 434,684 votes cast, Ben Gurion’s Mapai Party comes out as the biggest party and wins 46 of the 120 seats in the parliament. The government is installed on March 10, and David Ben Gurion becomes Prime Minister and Defense Minister. The Knesset will meet for a brief period in Tel Aviv before moving to Jerusalem. Some of the major issues the First Knesset deals with is organizing the Israel Defense Forces, mass immigration, housing shortage, and building education systems where different ideological streams are represented,. The debates lead to several coalition crises. On October 15, 1950 Ben Gurion resigns due to disagreement on the education system. He forms a second government two weeks later with the same coalition partners.



* * * * * * * * * * * *
SUPPORT WORD OF LIFE ISRAEL

Israel needs a voice. Amidst a sea of biased and often incorrect news reporting, Israel Report speaks for Israel's case. You can strengthen this voice by supporting Israel Report's goal of spreading objective and truthful information from Israel.

The Priesthood of God

We are God’s priests. We are responsible for keeping the fires on the altars of our devotional lives burning through constant prayer. Then the fire of the Holy Spirit will never go out.

“The fire on the altar must be kept burning; it must not go out. Every morning the priest is to add firewood and arrange the burnt offering on the fire and burn the fat of the fellowship offerings on it” (Lev. 6:12, NIV).

It is important for us to love lost souls, to bend our knees to groan and cry out for this lost world. When we accept Jesus, the flames on the altar reach the ceiling. However, with time, the love dies down, and the fire on the altar does, too. Then, where there was fire, only ashes remain.

If we allow the fire on the altar to go out as happened to the Levites, we aren’t suitable as priests; we fail in our duties. If we don’t keep the fire on the altar of God burning in our lives, we will grow cold. We will lose the love we had for souls lost without Christ and cease to care for the work of God and our brothers and sisters.

—Carlos Annacondia

Lord, where there are only burning embers in my heart, rekindle the fire and set my soul ablaze for You.

Carlos Annacondia, Listen to Me, Satan! (1998), 27.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Economics focus: Malthus, the false prophet

The pessimistic parson and early political economist remains as wrong as ever

AMID an astonishing surge in food prices, which has sparked riots and unrest in many countries and is making even the relatively affluent citizens of America and Europe feel the pinch, faith in the ability of global markets to fill nearly 7 billion bellies is dwindling. Given the fear that a new era of chronic shortages may have begun, it is perhaps understandable that the name of Thomas Malthus is in the air. Yet if his views were indeed now correct, that would defy the experience of the past two centuries.

Malthus first set out his ideas in 1798 in “An Essay on the Principle of Population”. This expounded a tragic twin trajectory for the growth of human populations and the increase of food supply. Whereas the natural tendency was for populations to grow without end, food supply would run up against the limit of finite land. As a result, the “positive checks” of higher mortality caused by famine, disease and war were necessary to bring the number of people back in line with the capacity to feed them.

In a second edition published in 1803, Malthus softened his original harsh message by introducing the idea of moral restraint. Such a “preventive check”, operating through the birth rather than the death rate, could provide a way to counter the otherwise inexorable logic of too many mouths chasing too little food. If couples married late and had fewer children, population growth could be sufficiently arrested for agriculture to cope.

It was the misfortune of Malthus—but the good luck of generations born after him—that he wrote at an historical turning point. His ideas, especially his later ones, were arguably an accurate description of pre-industrial societies, which teetered on a precarious balance between empty and full stomachs. But the industrial revolution, which had already begun in Britain, was transforming the long-term outlook for economic growth. Economies were starting to expand faster than their populations, bringing about a sustained improvement in living standards.

Far from food running out, as Malthus had feared, it became abundant as trade expanded and low-cost agricultural producers like Argentina and Australia joined the world economy. Reforms based on sound political economy played a vital role, too. In particular, the abolition of the Corn Laws in 1846 paved the way for British workers to gain from cheap food imports.

Malthus got his demographic as well as his economic predictions wrong. His assumption that populations would carry on growing in times of plenty turned out to be false. Starting in Europe, one country after another underwent a “demographic transformation” as economic development brought greater prosperity. Both birth and death rates dropped and population growth eventually started to slow.

The Malthusian heresy re-emerged in the early 1970s, the last time food prices shot up. Then, at least, there appeared to be some cause for demographic alarm. Global-population growth had picked up sharply after the second world war because it took time for high birth rates in developing countries to follow down the plunge in infant-mortality rates brought about by modern medicine. But once again the worries about overpopulation proved mistaken as the “green revolution” and further advances in agricultural efficiency boosted food supply.

If the world's population growth was a false concern four decades ago, when it peaked at 2% a year, it is even less so now that it has slowed to 1.2%. But even though crude demography is not to blame, changing lifestyles arising from rapid economic growth especially in Asia are a new worry. As the Chinese have become more affluent, they have started to consume more meat, raising the underlying demand for basic food since cattle need more grain to feed than humans. Neo-Malthusians question whether the world can provide 6.7 billion people (rising to 9.2 billion by 2050) with a Western-style diet.

Once again the gloom is overdone. There may no longer be virgin lands to be settled and cultivated, as in the 19th century, but there is no reason to believe that agricultural productivity has hit a buffer. Indeed, one of the main barriers to another “green revolution” is unwarranted popular worries about genetically modified foods, which is holding back farm output not just in Europe, but in the developing countries that could use them to boost their exports.


As so often, governments are making matters worse. Food-export bans are proliferating. Although these may produce temporary relief for any one country, the more they spread the tighter global markets become. Another wrongheaded policy has been America's subsidy to domestic ethanol production in a bid to reduce dependence on imported oil. This misconceived attempt to grow more fuel rather than to curb demand is expected to gobble up a third of this year's maize (corn) crop.

Although neo-Malthusianism naturally has much to say about food scarcity, the doctrine emerges more generally as the idea of absolute limits on resources and energy, such as the notion of “peak oil”. Following the earlier scares of the 1970s, oil companies defied the pessimists by finding extra fields, not least since higher prices had spurred new exploration. But even if oil wells were to run dry, economies can still adapt by finding and exploiting other energy sources.

A new form of Malthusian limit has more recently emerged through the need to constrain greenhouse-gas emissions in order to tackle global warming. But this too can be overcome by shifting to a low-carbon economy. As with agriculture, the main difficulty in making the necessary adjustment comes from poor policies, such as governments' reluctance to impose a carbon tax. There may be curbs on traditional forms of growth, but there is no limit to human ingenuity. That is why Malthus remains as wrong today as he was two centuries ago.

-

May 15th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Adoration

Adoration is an intense admiration that lifts us in reverence to worship and to the expression of that worship in various outward acts. It includes both the inward attitudes of the heart and the physical expression of those feelings.

Adoration involves a person's whole being. The mind comprehends the love and grace of God; the will sanctions what the mind understands and yearns to appropriate the revelation of God in Christ Jesus; the emotions are stirred to their maximum intensity in responding to the unearthly delight, unspeakable joy and unsurpassed peace.

Adoration inspires love and devotion so intense that it surpasses our understanding. Because words alone are usually impotent when it comes to expressing such depth of response, we are often forced to express adoration with song or physical activity—spontaneous or in liturgical form.

Adoration is far too personal to be a congregational action, although many persons sometimes respond in adoration to God under the same stimuli and at the same time. On other occasions, what stimulates one person to adoration will barely move another person to praise.

When concentrating on the benefits of God's blessings we seldom rise beyond the level of praise.Worshipers are people who engage in adoration—who have learned to respond to the love of God, and they find it relatively easy to pour out their love before the Lord. Adoration is merely a highly refined way of receiving God's love and passing it back with intense feeling and devotion. It's an exciting love relationship. We are loved, and He has become our Beloved.

—Judson Cornwallo

Lord, draw me into Your inner chambers so that I can pour my love on You with abandon.

Judson Cornwall, The Secret of Personal Prayer (1988), 184–185

Special report: INTERNATIONAL BANKING

Paradise lost


Banks are bound to fail from time to time. But does the fallout have to be so painful?

WILSON ERVIN, the chief risk officer at Credit Suisse, a large Swiss bank, cannot pinpoint the precise moment he knew something was up: “This was not like Paul on the road to Damascus.” But signs of the gathering subprime storm in America started to trigger alarms in late 2006. Data from the bank's trading desks and from mortgage servicers showed that conditions in the subprime market were worsening, and the bank decided to cut back on its exposures. At the same time Credit Suisse's proprietary risk model, designed to simulate the effect of crises, signalled a problem with the amount of risk-adjusted capital absorbed by its portfolio of leveraged loans. It duly started hedging its exposure to these assets as well.

Mr Ervin could not have guessed at the sheer scale of what was coming. For nine months now, banks have been in a panic: hoarding cash, nervous of weaknesses in their own balance-sheets and even more nervous of their counterparties. More damaging still, money-market funds have steered clear of banks as well. The drying-up of liquidity not only created havoc in the backrooms of the financial system. It also wrecked the front door, thanks to the dramatic collapse of Bear Stearns, an 85-year-old Wall Street investment bank that was bought for a song by JPMorgan Chase in March. The Federal Reserve offered emergency funding to the investment banks for the first time since the 1930s, and there were bank bail-outs in Britain and Germany too.

The economic effects are set to be just as striking. According to a study of previous crises by Carmen Reinhart of the University of Maryland and Ken Rogoff of Harvard, banking blow-outs lop an average of two percentage points off output growth per person. The worst crises reduce growth by five percentage points from their peak, and it takes more than three years for growth to regain pre-crisis levels. With so much at stake if the banks mess up, regulators and politicians are now asking fundamental questions. Should banks be allowed to take on as much debt? Can they be trusted to make their own assessment of the risks they run? Bankers themselves accept the need for change. “We've totally lost our credibility,” says one senior European banker.

To regain trust, banks will not need to be totally bomb-proof. Safe banks are easy enough to create: just push up their capital requirements to 90% of assets, force them to have secured funding for three years or tell them they can invest only in Treasury bonds. But that would severely compromise their ability to provide credit, so a more realistic approach is needed. This special report will ask how banks should be run and regulated so that the next time boom turns to bust the outcome will be less miserable for all concerned.

If the crisis were simply about the creditworthiness of underlying assets, that question would be simpler to answer. The problem has been as much about confidence as about money. Modern financial systems contain a mass of amplifiers that multiply the impact of both losses and gains, creating huge uncertainty.

Standard & Poor's, one of the big credit-rating agencies, has estimated that financial institutions' total write-downs on subprime-asset-backed securities will reach $285 billion, more than $150 billion of which has already been disclosed. Yet less than half that total comes from projected losses on the underlying mortgages. The rest is down to those amplifiers.

One is the use of derivatives to create exposures to assets without actually having to own them. For example, those infamous collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) contained synthetic exposures to subprime-asset-backed securities worth a whopping $75 billion. The value of loans being written does not set a ceiling on the amount of losses they can generate. The boss of one big investment bank says he would like to see much more certainty around the clearing and settlement of credit-default swaps, a market with an insanely large notional value of $62 trillion: “The number of outstanding claims greatly exceeds the number of bonds. It's very murky at the moment.”

A second amplifier is the application of fair-value accounting, which requires many institutions to mark the value of assets to current market prices. That price can overshoot both on the way up and on the way down, particularly when buyers are thin on the ground and sellers are distressed. When downward price movements can themselves trigger the need to unwind investments, further depressing prices, they soon become self-reinforcing.

A third amplifier is counterparty risk, the effect of one institution getting into trouble on those it deals with. The decision by the Fed to offer emergency liquidity to Bear Stearns and to facilitate its acquisition by JPMorgan Chase had less to do with the size of Bear's balance-sheet than with its central role in markets for credit-default and interest-rate swaps.

Trying to model the impact of counterparty risk is horribly challenging, says Stuart Gulliver, head of HSBC's wholesale-banking arm. First-order effects are easier to think through: a ratings downgrade of a “monoline” bond insurer cuts the value of the insurance policy it has written. But what about the second-order effect, the cost of replacing that same policy with another insurer in a spooked market?

The biggest amplifier of all, though, is excessive leverage. According to Koos Timmermans, the chief risk officer at ING, a big Dutch institution, three types of leverage helped propel the boom and have now accentuated the bust. First, many banks and other financial institutions loaded up on debt in order to increase their returns on equity when asset prices were rising (see chart 1). The leverage ratio at Bear Stearns rose from 26.0 in 2005 (meaning that total assets were 26 times the value of shareholders' equity) to 32.8 in 2007.

Second, financial institutions were exposed to product leverage via complex instruments, such as CDOs, which needed only a slight deterioration in the value of underlying assets for losses to escalate rapidly. And third, they overindulged in liquidity leverage, using structured investment vehicles (SIVs) or relying too much on wholesale markets to exploit the difference between borrowing cheap short-term money and investing in higher-yielding long-term assets. The combined effect was that falls in asset values cut deep into equity and triggered margin calls from lenders. The drying-up of liquidity had an immediate impact because debt was being rolled over so frequently.

That is not to suggest that the credit crunch is solely the responsibility of the banks, or that all of them are to blame. Banks come in all shapes and sizes, large and small, conservative and risk-hungry. Alfredo Sáenz, the chief executive of Santander, a Spanish retail giant, recalls attending a round-table of European bank bosses during the good times at which all the executives were asked about their strategic vision. Most of them talked about securitisation and derivatives, but when it was Mr Sáenz's turn, he touted old-fashioned efficiency. He did not get any questions. “There were 'clever' banks and 'stupid' banks,” he says. “We were considered one of the stupid ones.” No longer.

Beyond the banks, a host of other institutions must take some of the blame for the credit crunch. The credit-rating agencies had rose-tinted expectations about default rates for subprime mortgages. The monolines took the ill-fated decision to start insuring structured credit. Unregulated entities issued many of the dodgiest mortgages in America.

And no explanation of the boom can ignore the wall of money, much of it from Asia and oil-producing countries, that was looking for high returns in a world of low interest rates. “It is indisputable that the global glut of liquidity played a role in the 'reach for yield' phenomenon and that this reach for yield led to strong demand for and supply of complex structured products,” says Gerald Corrigan, a partner at Goldman Sachs and an éminence grise of the financial world.

Many blame the central banks: tougher monetary policy would have encouraged investors to steer towards more liquid products. Others blame the investors themselves, many of whom relied on AAA ratings without questioning why they were delivering such high yields.


Still, the banks have been the principal actors in this drama, as victims as well as villains. The S&P 500 financials index has lost more than 20% of its value since August, and many individual institutions have fared far worse. Analysts have been forced to keep ratcheting down their forecasts. “The downside will be longer than anyone expects,” says David Hendler of CreditSights, a research firm. “There is so much leverage to be unwound.”

According to research by Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman, investment banks will be more severely affected by this crisis than by any other period of turmoil for at least 20 years. By the end of March the crunch had already wiped out nearly six quarters of the industry's profits, thanks to write-downs and lower revenues. Huw van Steenis of Morgan Stanley reckons that the final toll could be almost two-and-a-half years of lost profits (see chart 2).

Other industries have gone through similarly turbulent times: airlines in the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001, technology firms when the dotcom bubble burst. Even within the financial sector the banks are not the only ones currently suffering: hedge funds, insurers, asset managers and private-equity firms have been hit too. But banks are special.

The first reason for that is the inherent fragility of their business model. Bear Stearns, an institution with a long record of surviving crises, was brought to its knees in a matter of days as clients and counterparties withdrew funding. Even the strongest bank cannot survive a severe loss of confidence, because the money it owes can usually be called in more quickly than the money it is owed. HBOS, a big British bank with a healthy funding profile, watched its shares plummet on a single day in March as short-sellers fanned rumours that it was in trouble. It survived, but the confidence trick on which banking depends—persuading depositors and creditors that they can get their money back when they want—was suddenly laid bare.

The second reason why banks are special is that they do lots of business with each other. In most industries the demise of a competitor is welcomed by rival firms. In banking the collapse of one institution sends a ripple of fear through all the others. The sight of customers queuing last September to withdraw their money from Northern Rock, a British bank, sparked fears that other runs would follow.

The third and most important reason is the role that banks play as the wheel-greasers of the economy, allocating and underwriting flows of credit to allow capital to be used as productively as possible. That process has now gone into reverse. Banks have seen their capital bases shrink as write-downs have eaten into equity and off-balance-sheet assets have been reabsorbed. Now they need to restore their capital ratios to health to satisfy regulators and to reassure customers and investors.

For some, that has meant tapping new sources of capital, often sovereign-wealth funds. For most, it has meant reducing the size of their balance-sheets by selling off assets or by cutting back their lending. Quantifying the impact of this tightening is hard, but one calculation presented by a quartet of economists at America's Monetary Policy Forum in February suggested that if American financial institutions were to end up losing $200 billion, credit to households and companies would contract by a whopping $910 billion. That equates to a drop in real GDP growth of 1.3 percentage points in the following year. If the banks suffer, we all do.


>>>>>



-
May 15th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Economist Intelligence Unit Briefing: Australia's budget

Tax cuts in Labor's first budget

Australia's Labor government unveiled its first budget on May 13th. The new government's main goals in crafting the budget were to reward the electorate with tax cuts and to keep spending under control in order to curb inflation. A raft of tax breaks and benefits, especially for working-class households, will shift some of the tax burden to high-income earners while reducing taxes overall by A$46.7bn (US$43.5bn) over the next four years. At the same time, government spending is set to increase only by a modest 1.1%, resulting in a projected budget surplus of A$21.7bn. The government also plans to delay a significant portion of its spending until next year, when both economic growth and inflation are set to ease.


The 2008/09 budget represents the new Labor administration's first difficult policy test. Since taking office after winning the federal election in November, the prime minister, Kevin Rudd, has fulfilled several high-profile election pledges—including an official apology to Aborigines, ratification of the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse-gas emissions and a decision to reduce military involvement in Iraq. These measures demonstrated that the new government is more in touch with the electorate, but they were successes in part because they produced a "feel-good" effect without requiring immediate sacrifices. Crafting a budget that would fulfil campaign pledges to cut taxes while keeping inflation under control was a task of a different order, presenting genuine dilemmas as the government sought to balance the interests of various political constituencies and conflicting economic imperatives.

The details of the new budget suggest that the government has managed a reasonable balance. On the issue of tax cuts, the government has delivered on its main campaign promise primarily by extending tax breaks and benefits to lower-income households, including education and childcare rebates. In the fiscal year starting in July, the minimum salary thresholds for the 30%, 40% and 45% tax brackets have been increased by A$4,000, A$5,000 and A$30,000, respectively. People earning an average wage of A$50,000 in 2008/09 will pay A$1,000 less in tax than in the previous year. The budget also doubles the minimum salary threshold for contributions to government health insurance, to A$100,000. All this will benefit the low- and medium-income households hit hardest by surging inflation and high interest rates, which have driven up the cost of food, transport and house payments. Not incidentally, these income groups form a political constituency that was crucial in Labor's election victory in November.

Some aspects of the government's re-jigging of tax breaks, such as a decision to use "means-testing" to restrict the number of families eligible for the government's baby bonus, will prove controversial. Households that earn more than A$150,000 annually will no longer be eligible for the A$5,000 bonus and some other family benefits. But while this and other progressive tax measures—such as a broader definition of taxable income and higher taxes on luxury vehicles—will be unpopular in some quarters, they are broadly in line with Labor's election platform and have not come as a surprise.


The government's plans to cut some A$33bn in spending on programmes put in place by the previous government could prove more controversial. On this front, however, the government has had to strike a difficult balance between the need to maintain economic momentum and the need to curb further price growth. Inflation is set to remain high over the next two years, even as the growth of the economy slows. With interest rates already at 7.25%, the government has opted for a mildly deflationary budget. Spending is expected to increase by 1.1% in real terms--the lowest rate of increase in nine years, but enough to ensure a moderate stimulus to domestic demand. In the meantime, other government measures—such as a decision to allow more skilled migrants into the country—will also help to ease inflation.

Combined with tax cuts, the government's relatively subdued spending plans are expected to result in a record surplus of A$21.7bn, or 1.8% of GDP, in the 2008/09 fiscal year. Furthermore, although falls in equity prices will reduce the revenue from capital gains tax, soaring prices for coal and iron ore--which will yield substantial gains in resource-sector revenue--together with solid profitability, low unemployment and robust wage growth, will boost the government's takings. To avoid adding to inflationary pressures, the government has decided to delay in part the spending of its massive surplus. The treasurer, Wayne Swan, also announced the creation of three funds that will spend a total of A$40bn on infrastructure, health and education. These funds will be invested in projects that will reduce inflationary pressures in the longer term by increasing productivity and easing supply bottlenecks.


Although the new budget aims to balance growth and inflation, the Labor administration is trying to manage expectations about the economic impact of its fiscal plans. This is not surprising, given that Mr Rudd's predecessor, John Howard, was punished by voters in November for the sharp rise in interest rates during his final term in office. In his budget speech, Mr Swan was careful not to fall into the trap of promising an end to interest-rate increases, citing the independence of the central bank and the impact of international prices, and arguing that it will take time for inflationary pressures to ease.



-
May 15th 2008
From the Economist Intelligence Unit ViewsWire

Monday, May 12, 2008

Economist Intelligence Unit Briefing: Iran's economy

Long delays for Iran's LNG projects

The indications that Shell and, most likely, Total will not meet Iran's mid-June deadline for them to commit themselves to going ahead with their long-standing liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects reflect both the difficulties of doing business in sanctions-hit Iran and the broader problem of escalating global costs of energy schemes of this sort. Major oil and gas projects are indeed stalled in Iran, but progress is also painfully slow elsewhere; according to Petroleum Economist, an industry magazine, only four LNG projects have attained "final investment decisions" over the past 18 months (in Peru, Australia, Algeria and Angola), and all of these have also faced long delays.


In response to reports that it had pulled out of its LNG project, which entailed integrating the development of Phase 13 of Iran's South Pars gasfield with a liquefaction plant and marketing strategy, Shell issued a statement suggesting a more nuanced picture. Shell said that it had "agreed the principle of substitution of alternative later phases for the Persian LNG project so that the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) can proceed with the immediate development of Phase 13". This statement suggests that the two sides have agreed that the development of Phase 13 should not be delayed any longer owing to the difficulty of agreeing final commercial terms for building the LNG plant for which the gas from this phase has been designated. At the same time, Iran seems to be concerned to keep open the option of enlisting Shell's technical and marketing know-how and financial input for an LNG project linked to a future phase of South Pars.

The South Pars reservoir is an extension of Qatar's North Field, which the Gulf Arab state has tapped for a series of LNG projects, enabling it to become the world's largest supplier of gas in this form (cooled to minus 162 degrees Celsius and transported by tanker to terminals where it is turned back into gas). Iran has divided South Pars into 25 phases, each involving the production of about 1bn cu ft/day of natural gas (roughly equivalent to 10bn cu metres/year). The first to be brought on stream was Total's Phase 2, in 2002. The first five phase are now operational, and the government expects the next three (6, 7 and 8, being developed with StatoilHydro) to reach full production by mid-2009, some two years behind schedule. Phases 9 and 10, being undertaken by South Korean contractors, are also getting close to completion, and Iranian companies are working on Phases 15 to 18.

Most of the South Pars phases have been dedicated to supply gas to Iran's domestic market, including power stations, home heating and petrochemicals, as well as for re-injection into oilfields in order to sustain or enhance crude production. The exceptions were Phases 11-14, which were designated for export as LNG or gas-to-liquids (GTL). Total has signed preliminary agreements for Phase 11, Shell (with Repsol) has been discussing Phase 13 (and some elements of Phase 14), and NIOC is working on Phase 12.


Both Shell and Total have continued negotiating with Iran about their respective projects despite the growing clamour in the US about Western investment in the Iranian energy sector. Shell maintains that it has made relatively good progress with the upstream part of its project, but it concedes that it has proved to be more difficult to reach agreement on the contractual details of the LNG elements. This is likely to be the result of a combination of factors relating both to the increased difficulty of financing projects in Iran and securing the appropriate technology inputs, and to the problem of managing costs.

Iran, for its part, is keen to move ahead with the next phases of South Pars to fulfil its growing domestic needs and to enable it to canvass a number of export options, including pipelines to Turkey and to gas-hungry Gulf Arab states such as the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman. Another important consideration for Iran is the fact that Phase 13 runs along the maritime border with Qatar, and is thus liable to be affected by the intensive activity in the North Field.

The announcement from Shell has provided some insights into the challenges that Iran and its foreign partners face in getting an LNG industry off the ground. However, it also indicates that both parties remain committed to surmounting the obstacles to turning that aspiration into a reality.



-
May 13th 2008
From the Economist Intelligence Unit ViewsWire

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Israel Report - May 9, 2008

THIS WEEK'S NEWS:

1. "ISRAEL IS AN AMAZING THING – BUT IT IS NOT PERFECT"
2. OLMERT MIGHT HAVE REACHED THE END OF THE LINE
3. BRIEFS
4. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: MAY 1948


* * * * * * * * * * * *


WORD OF LIFE CONGRATULATES ISRAEL ON ITS 60TH ANNIVERSARY!
WITH GRATITUDE FOR EVERYTHING ISRAEL HAS CONTRIBUTED - WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE CONTINUATION.


1. "ISRAEL IS AN AMAZING THING – BUT IT IS NOT PERFECT"

In connection with the celebration of Israel’s 60th anniversary that took place yesterday, the leaders of the nation made numerous interviews and speeches focusing on the achievements and challenges of the nation. Every one of them felt compelled to refer to themes that have followed Israel throughout its sixty years and continues to do so; war and peace. Prime Minister Olmert said: "Our forefathers’ decree and our legacy ‘seek and pursue peace’ is translated by us into political action and a willingness to make essential compromises... Another decree of the fallen [soldiers], which to us is the decree of life, is that we will defend the security of the state of Israel with all our might, without any hesitation or capitulation."

Dalia Itzik, Speaker of the Knesset, emphasized the great achievements of Israel during its brief period saying "the state of Israel is an unusual success history, a wonder by any historical standard." While using most of the speech to list some of her nation’s great achievements, she also had a message for the neighboring Arab people: "We seek peace and we desire peace for your children as well, but beware – our children know very well the art of war if it is required."

Israel’s 84 year old President, Shimon Peres, is well known for his oratory skills and ability to express profound truths in terse statements. In several interviews, the President, while holding fast to his belief that economic cooperation is the key to peace, made some unusual remarks. Peres said he believes the young generation has greater chances of making peace since they are more pragmatic. Whereas the generation that built the nation was more occupied with ideology, the current generation is more focused on solving day to day problems.

Peres, a main player in the Oslo negotiations and "infamous" for his optimism to reach a peace agreement, was unusually sharp in his criticism of the Palestinian Arabs. "We became more flexible and they became more extreme," he said regarding the development the last decade. Peres added that he did not imagine the Arabs would be shooting rockets from Gaza after Israel left that area or that Hamas would win the election in the Palestinian Authority. The President was still optimistic about the future and concluded: "Israel is an amazing thing – but not perfect."

Comment:
Israel is indeed an amazing and miraculous story. There should be no need to list all of its great achievements in the different fields while also pointing out the hardships under which these developments took place. The nation is to be congratulated! It is a telling phenomenon that when Palestinian Arabs are asked which democracy they admire the most, Israel is on top of the list. Nations around the world would do well to send their representatives to Israel to learn and not only to criticize or try to fix everything they consider is wrong.

Peres is a brilliant politician and intellectual. He has played a part in almost every major Israeli decision since the birth of the state in 1948. However, his comment about ideology versus pragmatism is questionable. Even when solving problems on a day to day basis there is an underlying ideology which guides how the problem is solved. The President’s observation that while Israelis became more flexible, the Arabs became more extreme testifies to the fact that Arabs solve problems differently. While admitting the danger of generalizing, one might say that Arabs are guided by another kind of logic. It is a dangerous attitude to place one’s own culture’s pattern of behavior as standard for all others. This might be the reason Peres could not imagine the Gaza terorists would continue to shoot rockets at Israel after the disengagement. Israel can hardly afford to repeat such miscalculations.



2. OLMERT MIGHT HAVE REACHED THE END OF THE LINE

Just before the celebrations of Israel’s sixtieth anniversary, the nation received news that Prime Minister Olmert is being investigated again. At the time of writing the press censure on the issue is still in effect and few details have been published due to the risk of losing evidence in the investigation. However, rumors have it that this case is more serious than the previous four investigations, of which three are still ongoing. Several Knesset members now believe Olmert will have to leave office.

The Prime Minister has responded that the media is filled with lies and rumors, and he intends to continue business as usual. Friday might be a critical day as the court is supposed to lift the censure. If the suspected wrongdoing is of serious character, the Kadima representatives at the Knesset may force Olmert to leave. If this should happen, there are several options, but Foreign Minister and Acting Prime Minister Tzipi Livni would most probably step in as Prime Minister for a care-taker government. It is also probable that the coalition would break up and the opposition would ask for new elections.

If new elections are announced, the next Prime Minister will probably be Likud’s Benjamin Netanyahu. But reports have it that Livni and leader of the Labor Party Ehud Barak might try to join forces to resist the challenge from Netanyahu.

Comment:
In Israeli politics things happen fast and unexpectedly. During Olmert’s two years in office the media has several times declared his downfall and predicted his successor. But Olmert is still Prime Minister and has proved an impressive staying power. A commentator said that Olmert is like the cat; he has nine lives. But, the commentator added, even nine is a limited number. One thing is certain, a huge majority of Israelis would be happy to see Olmert leave – although preferably under other circumstances.



3. BRIEFS

According to a poll published by Yediot Achronot, 91% of Israelis say life is good in Israel. Seventy percent of respondents said they are never embarrassed of being Israeli, and 64% say they would never consider leaving Israel, even if they had the opportunity to move. To the question of what they felt was Israel's greatest achievement in the 60 years, a 31% majority voted for Israel's stunning victory in the 1967 Six Day War…

According to the figures released by the Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel's population stands at 7,282,000. Some 5,499,000 of the population (75.5 %) are Jews, 1,461,000 (20.1%) are Arabs and the remaining 322,000 (4.4%) are mainly immigrants and their offspring who are not registered as Jews. When the state of Israel was established, there were only 806,000 residents. This number reached its first and second million in 1949 and 1958 respectively. In 1990, Israel's population hit five million and in 1998, after the wave of immigration from the former Soviet Union, it numbered six million…

On Monday 400 new immigrants (olim in Hebrew) arrived in Israel, Ynet News writes. The newcomers, who came from Honduras, Australia, the US, Russia, France and other countries were greeted at Ben-Gurion Airport by Absorption Minister Jacob Edery and Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar. The olim will settle in 50 different cities throughout the country. According to Jewish Agency and Absorption Ministry statistics, 3,050,000 olim from over 90 countries have arrived in Israel since the birth of the State of Israel. The largest number of new immigrants – 239,954 - arrived in 1949. The majority of olim arrived from the former Soviet republics. The oldest new immigrant was 111 years old when she arrived from Georgia…

Over the past few days 150 foreign paratroopers representing armies from around the world arrived in Israel to partake in a special Independence Day performance, Arutz Sheva writes. Among them came paratroopers from the US, England, France, Spain, Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Singapore, South Africa, Canada, Greece, Italy and Switzerland. In addition to military performance, the foreign paratroopers also participated in other events. For example, A Dutch paratrooper, Jesper Nels, who is the grandson of a Righteous Gentile (a non-Jew who saved Jews during the WWII), planted an olive tree next to the IDF paratrooper's memorial and met the family of the man who was saved by his grandfather. The foreign paratroopers also visited Jerusalem and followed in the footsteps of the Jerusalem Brigade that fought in the 1967 Six Day War. One of the participants, a French paratrooper is called Yoni in honor of legendary IDF commander Yoni Netanyahu. He was allowed to fulfill his dream and was given the IDF's wings…

Israel is joining the countries set to offer aid to Myanmar after the cyclone storm last weekend that left at least 22,500 people dead. The Foreign Ministry will be sending an initial $100,000 aid package comprised of medicine and medical equipment to Myanmar in the next few days. Several Israeli non-profit organizations sent teams of medical and rescue professionals to Myanmar…



4. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: MAY 1948

US Defense Secretary James Forrestal speaks with President Harry Truman’s advisor Clark Clifford and says: "There are thirty million Arabs on one side and about 600,000 Jews on the other. Why don’t you face up to the realities?" The statement is part of a major disagreement between the President and the State Department. Truman is in favor of recognizing the Jewish state that is to be declared whereas the State Department headed by the former general George Marshall is against. At 6:11 p.m. on May 14, 1948 the US becomes the first nation to recognize the State of Israel, eleven minutes after Ben Gurion reads the proclamation.

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Economics Focus: A tale of two worlds

If emerging economies diverge from America's, monetary policy also needs to break free

POLICYMAKERS in Washington and London have been losing sleep over the risks of financial meltdown and recession. In sharp contrast, the biggest worry in Beijing, Moscow and other emerging-market capitals is rising inflation. China's inflation rate has jumped to 8.3% from 2.2% in early 2007; Russia's is running at 13.3% (see left-hand chart). HSBC forecasts that the average inflation rate in emerging economies will rise to 6.6% this year, its highest in ten years.

One reason is the surge in food and energy prices. Food accounts for a bigger slice of spending in poor countries than in rich ones, so rising grain and meat prices have a bigger impact on inflation. But this is only part of the story: core inflation rates are also creeping up, and lax monetary policies are to blame.

As America stumbles, growth in emerging economies seems to be holding up well. HSBC forecasts average GDP growth of 6.5% this year, more than four times as fast as in developed countries. The problem is that although economies may have decoupled, their monetary policies have not. Whereas the greater resilience of the emerging world is a source of stability for the global economy, the monetary linkages between rich and poor economies complicate matters.

Emerging economies were partly to blame for America's housing and credit bubble. As China and Gulf oil exporters purchased American Treasury bonds in order to hold down their currencies, this pushed down bond yields and helped to fuel the housing boom. Low yields also encouraged investors to seek higher returns in riskier assets, such as mortgage-backed securities. That bubble has burst, prompting the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates. Now, those same exchange-rate policies that helped to cause America's financial crisis are leading emerging economies to run overly loose monetary policies.

Apart from the Gulf states, few countries still peg their currencies to the dollar, but most try to limit the amount of appreciation. This means that as the Fed cuts rates there is pressure on emerging economies to do the same, to prevent capital inflows pushing up their exchange rates. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain have all followed the Fed's April 30th rate cut. In the face of rising inflation, emerging economies should be lifting interest rates, not cutting them, but their rigid currency policies make this hard. In turn, continued surging demand in emerging economies boosts commodity prices, which reduces Americans' spending power and so encourages the Fed to cut rates further. The more the Fed cuts, the bigger the risk of inflation in emerging markets.

The right-hand chart shows just how loose monetary policy is. Joachim Fels and Manoj Pradhan, of Morgan Stanley, have made a stab at estimating neutral interest rates, ie, the short-term rates that would keep GDP growing at its trend pace and inflation on a stable path. The results are startling. In China and Russia, actual real rates are negative, against estimates of neutral real rates of 8% and 5% respectively. In India, real rates are close to zero—still far below the estimated neutral rate of 6%. Only in Brazil are real rates positive and above the neutral rate. Admittedly this ignores other tightening measures that central banks use, such as banks' reserve requirements (both India and China have been steadily increasing them). Nevertheless, it is no coincidence that Brazil has the lowest inflation rate of the four countries. Russia, with the lowest real interest rates, has the highest inflation.


The usual advice given to overheating emerging economies is that they must let their currencies rise. This would help to curb inflation by reducing import prices, and a flexible exchange rate would create more room for an independent monetary policy. Currency appreciation thus seems the obvious solution. However, Stephen King and Stuart Green, economists at HSBC, argue in a recent report that it raises many awkward questions.

How far should currencies rise in order to keep inflation in check? China has allowed the yuan to rise by 18% against the dollar since 2005. Brazil's currency has appreciated by more than 100% since 2003, yet even this has not stopped inflation from picking up. At 4.7%, the rate may be lower than other big developing countries, but it is still up from less than 3% a year ago, partly because of excessive growth in domestic demand. In the past two years real interest rates have fallen sharply (although they are still the highest in the world) and public spending has surged. In April the central bank raised interest rates for the first time in three years, but this is likely to lure in foreign capital. Should Brazil let its exchange rate rise further—when its current account has already moved back into deficit?

The danger of allowing these currencies to float is that they could overshoot as foreign capital floods in, eroding competitiveness and leaving economies vulnerable to a future reversal in capital flows. Another concern is whether it is wise to allow exchange rates to rise sharply when emerging-market exports are being hurt by an American recession.

There are no easy solutions. One alternative to a free float is a one-off appreciation. The danger is that this could encourage the expectation of further appreciation, attract even bigger capital inflows and so exacerbate inflation. To work, the revaluation would need to be so big that speculators no longer expected a further rise. But a big increase might not be politically feasible. Another solution is to tighten fiscal policy. This would cool domestic demand without the need for a big rise in interest rates. The snag is that it would boost domestic saving and hence lead to larger current-account surpluses—the opposite of what America requires.

The third option, and the one most likely to be pursued, is to do nothing apart from slapping on some temporary price controls, and hope that inflation pressures will soon ease. The risk is that if inflation continues to rise, policymakers will eventually have to slam on the monetary brakes.

-

May 8th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Israel Report - May 2, 2008

THIS WEEK'S NEWS:

1. HAMAS SEEKS CALM – BUT FOR WHICH PURPOSES?
2. INVESTIGATIONS AND DEBATE AFTER THE DEATH OF FIVE CIVILIAN ARABS
3. YESTERDAY ISRAEL COMMEMORATED HOLOCAUST VICTIMS
4. THE COMMANDER OF THE LEGENDARY EXODUS DIES
5. BRIEFS
6. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: 1944



* * * * * * * * * * * *

1. HAMAS SEEKS CALM – BUT FOR WHICH PURPOSES?

According to a familiar pattern, Israel may again take steps to benefit the Palestinian Arabs before a Condoleezza Rice visit. The American Secretary of State is due to arrive in Israel on Saturday night, and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is now considering accepting a ceasefire with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Egyptian-brokered ceasefire is supposed to include an end to the blockade of Gaza, and create a more positive atmosphere in the area when Rice, and one week later, President Bush, will visit.

There is however strong opposition within the government against a possible ceasefire. Minister of Internal Security Avi Dichter, says Hamas will use the calm to regroup and rearm as they have done before. A ceasefire has to be reached from a state of deterrence, he added. Dichter moreover was concerned by the fact that although there are no direct negotiations between Israel and Hamas, the Egyptian initiative may be understood as a legitimizing of the terror organization which Israel is trying to isolate.

Meanwhile recent statistics reveal that the different terror organizations in Gaza are sending more rockets towards Israel than ever before. During the first four months of 2008, more than 900 rockets have been launched compared to 1,100 during all of 2007. This equates to approximately one rocket every third hour. In addition, Israel intelligence services warned this week that Hamas is trying to carry out a major terror attack in connection with the celebration of Israel’s 60th anniversary next week.

Comment:
The Egyptian spokesman Hossam Zaki said to Israel’s Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni that she should accept the ceasefire since "tahadiya is a good thing for civilians." The use of the word tahadiya is interesting. This is the word for a brief period of calm. The more common word to use is hudna which would imply a somewhat longer period. In other words, Hamas, and the other terror organizations in Gaza are looking for some breathing space before they strike again.

There is nothing in the Egyptian proposal that suggests any change of mind, change of program, or change of goal on the side of Hamas. There is nothing that points to a future for Jews in the area in this proposal. The reason Hamas asked for a tahadiya, is that they are hard pressed by the Israeli Army at the moment and need to gather strength. Their desire is still to destroy Israel, as their charter makes abundantly clear, but they are willing to delay their attempts to do so for a few weeks. Bluntly speaking, Hamas is saying to Israel: "Let us make an agreement that we will try to kill you later."

There is no denying that a ceasefire is good for the civilians. But this is so in the short term only. The very word tahadiya is a promise that another round will come – and at that point Hamas will be more powerful. Although it is painful to face this, as long as there is no change in the anti-Zionistic ideology of the terrorists, the determined continuation of the struggle against terrorism still presents itself as the best alternative. Reason says: if someone is intent on harming you, you take away his means of doing so.



2. INVESTIGATIONS AND DEBATE AFTER THE DEATH OF FIVE CIVILIAN ARABS

On Monday morning a mother and four of her children were killed in Gaza after an Israeli plane fired at two terrorists outside the home where the mother was preparing breakfast. The two terrorists were also killed in the blast. After the tragic incident the IDF ordered an investigation of the events. According to preliminary results of the investigation, there was a secondary explosion, probably caused by bombs the terrorists were carrying, and this is what caused the death of the family, IDF says. Betselem, a human rights organization focusing on the Palestinian Arabs, says their findings do not support the IDF version of events. The final IDF report is expected to be finished within days.

Referring to the incident, Ehud Olmert said Israel is saddened by the death of the family. However, he placed the full responsibility for the deaths on Hamas who is using the civilian population as human shields by operating from built up areas. Because of this cynical use of their own population, Olmert questioned the sorrow expressed by the terror organizations over the deaths: "I believe that our sadness is more genuine, more sincere and more painful than the false and self-righteous sadness of the terrorist organizations which expose their civilians to situations that end in such tragedies."

Comment:
In Israeli radio and TV throughout Monday and Tuesday the discussion went on almost uninterrupted: "How could this happen?" Should Israel apologize? How can we prevent this from happening again?" As always in Israel, the views are varied, convinced, and very often, well articulated. But the issue is not so much the different views, but rather the fact that the incident stirred such a debate; a soul-searching debate, it could be added.

Simultaneously, the IDF is looking into the question of whether those who made the decision to fire at the terrorists also took into account the possibility that they might be carrying explosives. It is a peculiar question with potentially far-reaching consequences. If this is a consideration that should be taken into the picture, we will reach the rather absurd situation where a terrorist will in principle be immune against attack if he stays in built up areas and makes sure to carry explosives.The main point, however, is that the question testifies to the high moral standard the IDF is doing their best to operate according to.

It is a shame that a large part of the international media totally ignores the moral difference between the IDF and the terrorists. When a Hamas attack "succeeds" and kills or maims Israeli civilians, Hamas distributes sweets and organizes rallies to celebrate it. Media tend to encourage this behavior by offering one-sided reports that focus on Arab suffering and tries to explain the above behavior as a result of the suffering. In this "explanation" is hidden a large extent of justification. But there are some things that cannot be explained – and certainly not justified.



3. YESTERDAY ISRAEL COMMEMORATED HOLOCAUST VICTIMS

On Thursday Israel commemorated Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Day (Yom HaShoah Ve-haGvura in Hebrew). On Wednesday evening a memorial ceremony was held at Yad Vashem in which six torches, representing the six million murdered Jews, were lit. On Thursday morning at ten o'clock the sounding of a siren was heard for two minutes throughout the country. For the duration of the siren, work was halted, people walking in the streets stopped, cars pulled off the side of the road and everybody stood silent to honor the victims of the Holocaust.

During the ceremony on Wednesday evening Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reminded the people that the voices of Holocaust deniers are also being heard. Palestinian Media Watch writes that last week Hamas TV presented its latest sinister twist on Holocaust denial. It broadcasted an educational program teaching that "the murder of Jews in the Holocaust was a Zionist plot with two goals: first, to eliminate disabled and handicapped Jews by sending them to death camps, so they would not be a burden on the future state of Israel and secondly, the Holocaust served to make "the Jews seem persecuted" so they could benefit from international sympathy."

Yad Vashem, the Holocaust remembrance and education center in Jerusalem is making efforts to reach Arab speaking audience all over the world. In January it opened a web site in Arabic and on Tuesday it launched two Youtube channels, in English and Arabic, which include testimonies and personal stories of Holocaust victims.

On Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism published its report that revealed an alarming increase of violent attacks against Jews worldwide, Ynet News reports. A 6.6% rise in the number of anti-Semitic attacks has been registered across the world in 2007. Furthermore, it is worrisome that the number of severe violent attacks rose threefold in 2007.



4. THE COMMANDER OF THE LEGENDARY EXODUS DIES

Yossi Harel, the man who commanded the clandestine operations that brought in ships, carrying some 24,000 Holocaust survivors between 1945 and 1949, died on Saturday at the age of 90. One of the ships he commanded was the legendary Exodus. The Exodus left France on July 1947 and headed towards Palestine Mandate until the British Navy seized the vessel when it arrived at the coast. After a battle at sea that left three people dead, the British forced the ship to head back to Europe. The story was covered widely by international media and it is has been said that the Exodus had its role in galvanizing world opinion in favor of a Jewish state. The story of the Exodus was penned into a novel by Leon Uris and was also produced as a movie starring Paul Newman in a loose portrayal of Yossi Harel.



5. BRIEFS

A Palestinian Arab man was sentenced to death by Palestinian Arab judges in Hebron on Monday. He was in fact convicted because he had honored PA's peace obligation to cooperate with Israel against Palestinian Arab terrorist groups, Israel Today reports. In their ruling, the judges convicted the man of providing information to Israeli security forces that led to the deaths of four wanted terrorists. The sentence still requires the signature of PA leader Mahmoud Abbas. The so-called collaborator's execution will be carried out with a firing squad.

Haaretz writes that during the past eighteen months, Yad Vashem gathered over 120,000 previously undocumented names of Holocaust victims, mainly from ultra-Orthodox survivors. The gathered names will be added to the already over three million "pages of testimony" compiled by Yad Vashem to commemorate each Holocaust victim it has already succeeded in identifying.

A rarely displayed segment of the Dead Sea Scrolls will be displayed in the Israel Museum for Israel's 60th anniversary, Haaretz writes. The segment on display will be from Psalm 133: "Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity." There are about 1,000 segments of the 2000-year-old Dead Sea Scrolls. Eight pieces are on permanent display at the Israel museum and the rest are kept by Israeli Antiquities Authority and are rarely shown.

The Israeli National Roads Company recently started to use construction waste in producing the asphalt to pave the roads, Arutz Sheva reports. Recently, 400,000 cubic meters of construction waste were used to pave the roads in eastern Galilee. Israel construction industry produces about a million cubic meters of building waste every year, taking up a huge amount of landfill space. In 2007, Israel's Environmental Ministry instituted charges for dumping in landfills to encourage recycling. In addition to using construction waste, Israel is seeking to expand the types of waste to pave the roads. Trials are in progress using glass and other materials.



6. HISTORICAL FLASHBACK: 1944

Rafael Lemkin coins the word "genocide." Lemkin is a Jew who has escaped Europe and works as a scholar in the USA. Later he will find out that all of his family, 49 persons, were killed by the Nazis during the war. During the Nuremberg trial, Lemkin participates as an international lawyer, and in 1948 the United Nations’ General Assembly adopts his treaty on genocide: "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime Genocide." Lemkin defines genocide as: "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group" in a number of ways. Lemkin dies in 1959.

What Do "Green" and "Sustainability" Mean?

For several years, colleagues have debated the meanings of Green and Sustainability with little consensus. Those words seemed like shadows – plainly in view, able to be envisioned and identified, but almost impossible to hold. Every attempt at a working definition would be rebuked by a rightful exception, flaw, or consequence for which had not been accounted for. So, what do “Green” and “Sustainability” truly mean?
But maybe that is the point. The terms Green and Sustainability are tremendously subjective and even personal. Today, the worlds of Green and Sustainability are many-headed, and touch on an enormous breadth of actions and initiatives, products, services and industries. They carry different definitions for each person, and therefore motivate individuals in different manners. By that measure, we can begin to understand these ethereal terms, and at least set baseline definitions.
If we were to poll various types of people – from the ultra-liberal to the ultra-conservative, we would certainly find a wide spectrum of definitions of Green and Sustainability. Some may consider anything less than a wholesale return to pre-industrial living to not be Green. While others may believe that carving out sets of land as nature preserves is more than enough. Presumably, the majority would find their own definitions somewhere in the middle. Green and Sustainability are typically portrayed by the media, industry and various public interest groups through a variety of emotionally charged viewpoints. These reports often present various attempts to ameliorate a number of ‘risks’ posed to human, animal, plant and global health. The recent confusion of the two terms may be due in part to organizations marketing their green projects; or maybe it is a lack of understanding of the green movement and sustainable actions by mainstream media. Regardless of the cause, we should make an effort to understand the difference between Green and Sustainability.

Defining the Un-definable

Green and Sustainability are connected, but not the same. As mentioned, these words, or contexts, are becoming ‘umbrella terms’ used to describe the current (yet reoccurring) cultural movement toward the preservation of natural and/or environmental resources, societal health and wellness, and economy. Perhaps a safer stance would be to view Green as a philosophy – a general line of thought dedicated to preserving and promoting our ecological habitat (earth) while understanding the interconnection between society, environment and economy.

For our purposes, Green must also include the benefits our bodies receive by reducing our intake of toxins, artificial chemical compounds, and general atmospheric blight.
Sustainability refers to the objectives and initiatives we set forth coupled with the actions we take to both perform and ‘sustain’ any given ‘green’ task. In a sense, it is about preserving a certain condition or way of life through one’s actions and/or the ability to control one's surroundings. Within a Green philosophy context, this refers to the individual or group procedures undertaken to reach a Green ideal. This may be as broad as only planting native plants, installing a water filter rather than purchasing bottled water, or building a ‘green’ building. It is a more definite and concrete construct than Green, though equally important.
Sustainability will continue to grow in usage and importance. A widely-used description of Sustainability is to, ‘engage in processes that meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. The need for sustainable resources and processes is so great and so far-reaching that it was recognized long ago that grass roots efforts weren't enough. In the last two decades, initiatives have percolated up to the realm of organizations that can influence society and industry on a global scale.

Definitions in Action

Green and Sustainability have the attention of the largest multinational corporations and news outlets, so we can expect to see more articles on green companies and more news clips on sustainable activities from mainstream media. And this should be applauded. Universal principles of Sustainability incorporate areas of human rights, the environment, and anti-corruption with the action thereof to facilitate these principles.

In many cases, corporate marketing and media reports have confused the concepts of Green and Sustainability. The notions of Green and Sustainability are not just simply about 'saving the Earth.' Rather, they are multi-dimensional concepts encompassing the family, community, the environment, and the global economy . These concepts are influencing a foundation for world ‘consciousness’ while continuing to be forces defining personal values; thus driving the actions to ‘sustain’ these values to ensure this foundation. Simply stated, if possible, is that Green is the ‘philosophies or principles’ while Sustainability is the ‘actions to preserve this philosophy’. In the coming months, we will explore many more Green philosophies and Sustainable actions – some simple, some complex – but all with the same goal: To educate you, our readers, on ways to define and sustain your Green ideal.

Grasping at Shadows

For several years, colleagues have debated the meanings of Green and Sustainability with little consensus. Those words seemed like shadows – plainly in view, able to be envisioned and identified, but almost impossible to hold. Every attempt at a working definition would be rebuked by a rightful exception, flaw, or consequence for which had not been accounted for. So, what do “Green” and “Sustainability” truly mean?

But maybe that is the point. The terms Green and Sustainability are tremendously subjective . Today, the worlds of Green and Sustainability are many-headed, and touch on an enormous breadth of actions and initiatives, products, services and industries. By that measure, we can begin to understand these ethereal terms, and at least set baseline definitions.

If we were to poll various types of people – from the ultra-liberal to the ultra-conservative, we would certainly find a wide spectrum of definitions of Green and Sustainability. Some may consider anything less than an all-embracing return to pre-industrial living to not be Green. While others may believe that carving out sets of land as nature preserves is more than enough. Presumably, the majority would find their own definitions somewhere in the middle. Green and Sustainability are typically portrayed by the media, industry and various public interest groups through a variety of emotionally charged viewpoints. These reports often present various attempts to ameliorate a number of ‘risks’ posed to human, animal, plant and global health. The recent confusion of the two terms may be due in part to organizations marketing their green projects; or maybe it is a lack of understanding of the green movement and sustainable actions by mainstream media. Regardless of the cause, we should make an effort to understand the difference between Green and Sustainability.

Defining the Un-definable

Green and Sustainability are connected, but not the same. As mentioned, these words, or contexts, are becoming ‘umbrella terms’ used to describe the current (yet reoccurring) cultural movement toward the preservation of natural and/or environmental resources, societal health and wellness, and economy. Perhaps a safer stance would be to view Green as a philosophy – a general line of thought dedicated to preserving and promoting our ecological habitat (earth) while understanding the interconnection between society, environment and economy.For our purposes, Green also includes the benefits our bodies receive by reducing our intake of toxins, artificial chemical compounds, and general atmospheric blight.

Sustainability refers to the objectives and initiatives we set forth coupled with the actions we take to both perform and ‘sustain’ any given ‘green’ task. In a sense, it is about preserving a certain condition or way of life through one’s actions and/or the ability to control one's surroundings. Within a Green philosophy context, this refers to the individual or group procedures undertaken to reach a Green ideal. This may be as broad as only planting native plants, installing a water filter rather than purchasing bottled water, or building a ‘green’ building. It is a more definite and concrete construct than Green, though equally important.

Sustainability will continue to grow in usage and importance. A widely-used description of Sustainability is to, ‘engage in processes that meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. The need for sustainable resources and processes is so great and so far-reaching that it was recognized long ago that grass roots efforts weren't enough. In the last two decades, initiatives have percolated up to the realm of organizations that can influence society and industry on a global scale.

Definitions in Action

Green and Sustainability have the attention of the largest multinational corporations and news outlets, so we can expect to see more articles on green companies and more news clips on sustainable activities from mainstream media. And this should be applauded. Universal principles of Sustainability incorporate areas of human rights, the environment, and anti-corruption with the action thereof to facilitate these principles.

In many cases, corporate marketing and media reports have confused the concepts of Green and Sustainability. The notions of Green and Sustainability are not just simply about 'saving the Earth.' Rather, they are multi-dimensional concepts encompassing the family, community, the environment, and the global economy of. These concepts are influencing a foundation for world ‘consciousness’ while continuing to be forces defining personal values; thus driving the actions to ‘sustain’ these values to ensure this foundation. Simply stated, Green is the ‘philosophies or principles’ while Sustainability is the ‘actions to preserve this philosophy’. In the coming months, we will explore many more Green philosophies and Sustainable actions – some simple, some complex – but all with the same goal: To educate you, our readers, on ways to define and sustain your green ideal. We invite and encourage you to explore What “Green” and “Sustainability” Mean to You!




My 10 Day Fruit and Veggie Cleanse

The old adage “What goes in, must come out” holds true for most circumstances. The body, however, does not always follow this way of thinking, especially as it concerns the latter part of the saying about what comes out. Not everything we put in our bodies makes its way out—and what stays in can cause toxic build-up, digestive distress, and other health problems.

Habitual intake of a diet high in refined and highly processed foods can lead to accumulation of toxins, increased contact time, and irritation to the lining of the excretory system due to constipation and higher pressures developing inside the bowel. The longer toxins hang around your body, including inside your gut—the greater their potential for discomfort.

Even if you eat a healthier diet than the one described above, you still may encounter toxins; they are present everywhere in our environment. We drink eat, inhale, and produce toxins in small amounts—and no food is guaranteed 100 percent safe.

Sometimes foods we eat may contain untold numbers of agents that are not food: pesticides, additives, colorants, extraneous hormones, chemicals and heavy metals, not to mention prescription and non-prescription drugs—which our bodies, especially the liver, are forced to detoxify. Our elimination systems, especially our urine and stool, play a role in the toxin-cleansing process, too.

That’s why I make sure my digestive system gets a “clean sweep” four times a year. Granted, I eat healthier and live a healthier lifestyle than most people, but everyone carries some toxic load level—and I am not exempt. Some need to detoxify more than others, but everyone can benefit from a good cleansing!

I like to schedule a cleansing tune-up each quarter—for various reasons, including the necessity of periodic detoxification as well as following a logical, yearly schedule for doing so. If I plot it and plan for it, then it is easier to integrate into my lifestyle. (An added bonus is that each of the 10-day cleansings include a diet that makes sense for that particular season—including foods which are in-season and readily available; hot foods for colder weather; and cool foods for hotter weather!)

Here is an overview of my quarterly cleansing—with an emphasis on my most recent cleanse, a 10-day fruit and veggie experience: During my 10-day seasonal cleanses (plotted during the months of January, April, July and October), I eat five times a day, every two to three hours—generally around 7:30 a.m., followed by a second meal at 10:30 a.m., lunch at 1 p.m., a mid-afternoon meal at 3:30 p.m., and dinner at 6 p.m.

Each seasonal cleanse has its own characteristic dietary guidelines, but I want to share with you my most recent “summer” cleanse for the month of July—basically consisting of 10 days of refreshing fruits and veggies. (You can learn about my January, April, and October cleanses in the coming months.)

My Summer Cleanse: 10 Days of Delicious Fruits and Veggies

Day One
For my Summer Cleanse, the first day is a mono diet in which I eat the same fruit at each meal for the entire day, marked by five fruit servings (one or two cups of fruit for each serving). The best fruits for cleansing have a lot of water: watermelon, grapes, apples, and oranges. (Note: bananas don’t have nearly as much water.)

Days Two through Four
On Days 2-4, I eat four servings of fruit during the day, separated by two to three hours, followed by a healthy salad for dinner containing all the vegetables I can think of. Greens and sprouts are wonderful high-fiber foods, but I also add slices of cucumbers, carrots, red onion, cabbage, tomatoes, and celery. I then garnish my salad with half an avocado and add two tablespoons of a healthy raw salad dressing (or I make my own).

Days Five through Seven
On Days 5-7, I follow a similar pattern as days 2-4—except that I add raw nuts and seeds to my salad.

Days Eight through Ten
On Days 8-10, I eat one serving of fruit during the first two meals of the day. For my third and fourth meals, I eat one type of fruit and four ounces of whole milk plain yogurt or kefir and one tablespoon of honey.

I add raw cheese and fatty fish (like wild-caught salmon) to my salad meal—which made a great transition back to my established healthy eating plan once my summer cleanse was over.

My 10 Day Fruit and Veggie Cleanse

The old adage “What goes in, must come out” holds true for most circumstances. The body, however, does not always follow this way of thinking, especially as it concerns the latter part of the saying about what comes out. Not everything we put in our bodies makes its way out—and what stays in can cause toxic build-up, digestive distress, and other health problems.

Habitual intake of a diet high in refined and highly processed foods can lead to accumulation of toxins, increased contact time, and irritation to the lining of the excretory system due to constipation and higher pressures developing inside the bowel. The longer toxins hang around your body, including inside your gut—the greater their potential for discomfort.

Even if you eat a healthier diet than the one described above, you still may encounter toxins; they are present everywhere in our environment. We drink eat, inhale, and produce toxins in small amounts—and no food is guaranteed 100 percent safe.

Sometimes foods we eat may contain untold numbers of agents that are not food: pesticides, additives, colorants, extraneous hormones, chemicals and heavy metals, not to mention prescription and non-prescription drugs—which our bodies, especially the liver, are forced to detoxify. Our elimination systems, especially our urine and stool, play a role in the toxin-cleansing process, too.

That’s why I make sure my digestive system gets a “clean sweep” four times a year. Granted, I eat healthier and live a healthier lifestyle than most people, but everyone carries some toxic load level—and I am not exempt. Some need to detoxify more than others, but everyone can benefit from a good cleansing!

I like to schedule a cleansing tune-up each quarter—for various reasons, including the necessity of periodic detoxification as well as following a logical, yearly schedule for doing so. If I plot it and plan for it, then it is easier to integrate into my lifestyle. (An added bonus is that each of the 10-day cleansings include a diet that makes sense for that particular season—including foods which are in-season and readily available; hot foods for colder weather; and cool foods for hotter weather!)

Here is an overview of my quarterly cleansing—with an emphasis on my most recent cleanse, a 10-day fruit and veggie experience: During my 10-day seasonal cleanses (plotted during the months of January, April, July and October), I eat five times a day, every two to three hours—generally around 7:30 a.m., followed by a second meal at 10:30 a.m., lunch at 1 p.m., a mid-afternoon meal at 3:30 p.m., and dinner at 6 p.m.

Each seasonal cleanse has its own characteristic dietary guidelines, but I want to share with you my most recent “summer” cleanse for the month of July—basically consisting of 10 days of refreshing fruits and veggies. (You can learn about my January, April, and October cleanses in the coming months.)

My Summer Cleanse: 10 Days of Delicious Fruits and Veggies

Day One
For my Summer Cleanse, the first day is a mono diet in which I eat the same fruit at each meal for the entire day, marked by five fruit servings (one or two cups of fruit for each serving). The best fruits for cleansing have a lot of water: watermelon, grapes, apples, and oranges. (Note: bananas don’t have nearly as much water.)

Days Two through Four
On Days 2-4, I eat four servings of fruit during the day, separated by two to three hours, followed by a healthy salad for dinner containing all the vegetables I can think of. Greens and sprouts are wonderful high-fiber foods, but I also add slices of cucumbers, carrots, red onion, cabbage, tomatoes, and celery. I then garnish my salad with half an avocado and add two tablespoons of a healthy raw salad dressing (or I make my own).

Days Five through Seven
On Days 5-7, I follow a similar pattern as days 2-4—except that I add raw nuts and seeds to my salad.

Days Eight through Ten
On Days 8-10, I eat one serving of fruit during the first two meals of the day. For my third and fourth meals, I eat one type of fruit and four ounces of whole milk plain yogurt or kefir and one tablespoon of honey.

I add raw cheese and fatty fish (like wild-caught salmon) to my salad meal—which made a great transition back to my established healthy eating plan once my summer cleanse was over.

Chocolate as Health Food?!

Most of us know that fruits, vegetables and grains have health benefits, but did you also know that chocolate could be added to the list—especially concerning heart health? Research shows in tests using the "gold standard" for measuring antioxidants--ORAC (which stands for Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity, a method of measuring antioxidant capacities of different foods)--chocolate actually comes out ahead of the former antioxidant champs: tea, Concord grape juice, and blueberries. 1

Antioxidants are believed to help the body's cells resist damage caused by free radicals, formed by normal bodily processes such as breathing or environmental contaminants like cigarette smoke. When the body lacks adequate levels of antioxidants, free radical damage ensues.

Chocolate—a Flavonoid

A flavonoid is a pigment in plants and fruits that acts as an antioxidant to protect against damage from free radicals. In the body, flavonoids enhance the beneficial activities of vitamin C and therefore can help keep the body strong.2

Tests have shown that the flavonoids in chocolate are particularly potent antioxidants. Chocolate also contains some plant sterols, B vitamins, magnesium, copper, potassium, and other heart-healthy substances.3

Forms of Chocolate

Suggested forms of chocolate include:

  • Least processed: When cocoa is processed into your favorite chocolate products, it goes through several steps to reduce its naturally pungent taste—which, by the way, is provided by the flavonoids (polyphenols). The more chocolate is processed (such as alkalizing, roasting), the more flavonoids are lost. Most commercial chocolates fit this category, so choose the least processed forms.
  • Dark chocolate: Dark chocolate appears to retain the highest level of flavonoids. So your best bet is to choose dark chocolate over milk chocolate. 4

Fat in Chocolate and How Much to Consume

The fat in chocolate, from cocoa butter, contains oleic acid (a heart-healthy monounsaturated fat also found in olive oil) among other fats—but this does not give license to eat as much dark chocolate as we want. Be cautious as to the type of dark chocolate you choose and the serving size—since there is currently no established serving size of chocolate to reap these cardiovascular benefits.5

One thing is for sure--you no longer need to feel guilty if you enjoy a small piece of dark chocolate once in awhile.


References:

1 Reported at the Experimental Biology conference, Apr 2000

2 The Lancet. 344: 8933 (November 1994), 1356.

3 UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, June 2005, found online at: http://www.wellnessletter.com/html/wl/2005/wlFeatured0605.html

4 Cleveland Clinic. The Heart-Health Benefits of Chocolate Unveiled. Available at: http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/guide/prevention/nutrition/chocolate.htm

5 Cleveland Clinic. The Heart-Health Benefits of Chocolate Unveiled. Available at: http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/guide/prevention/nutrition/chocolate.htm

History of Sprouting

Carbohydrates provide energy needed to drive bodily chemical processes, but our ancestors (dating back to as far as 12,000 years ago) didn’t consume large amounts of carbohydrates. In fact, the simple sugars they consumed were highly nutritious fruits and vegetables and sprouted/germinated grains. Sprouting and germination allow grains to come alive, making nutrition within the seed available. These wheat and barley germinated seeds and the bread made from them were of great importance in ancient times.

Today, for people who cannot properly digest grains, seeds or legumes, the process of soaking and/or sprouting can unlock the goodness of these foods and ensure easy digestion and absorption. Whole grain, sprouted breads are available in health food stores and most modern grocery stores; they contain up to 4 times the protein and fiber compared with conventional white bread. (Note: One company in particular, Food for Life, has almost single-handedly made sprouting a household term.)


Why Soak or Sprout?

Grains and seeds are rich sources of nutrients—but when they are soaked or sprouted, they can become nutritional powerhouses. In a nutshell, here’s why: The germination process (sprouting) produces vitamin C and increases carotenoids and vitamin B content, especially vitamins B2 (riboflavin) , B5 (pantothenic acid), and B6 (pyridoxine). Even more importantly, sprouting neutralizes phytic acid, a substance present in the bran of all seeds that inhibits the absorption of calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc. Sprouting also neutralizes enzyme inhibitors present in all seeds. This is important because these inhibitors can neutralize your own precious enzymes in the digestive tract, which is one reason many people seem to get a stomach ache or excess bloating after consuming large amounts of seeds or grains. Sprouting can also inactivate certain toxins found in seeds.


Let’s take a closer look at some of these and how they tie in to overall health.

Vitamin C: Vitamin C is a powerful antioxidant which helps strengthen the immune system, helps fight cardiovascular disease by protecting the lining of arteries from oxidative damage, and helps protect the body from smoke and air pollutants.

Carotenoids: This class of antioxidants includes beta carotene, lutein, and lycopene. Research evidence indicates that carotenoids lower the risk of heart disease, some types of cancer, and help to strengthen the immune system.

Vitamin B2 (riboflavin): Riboflavin is a water-soluble vitamin which is involved in vital metabolic processes in the body, and is necessary for normal cell function, growth, and energy production.

Vitamin B5 (pantothenic acid): Pantothenic acid (vitamin B 5) is needed for the breakdown of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.

Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine): Vitamin B6 is needed for protein metabolism, red blood cell metabolism, and proper functioning of the nervous and immune systems. Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is also required for the synthesis of the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine, and for myelin formation.

Additionally, by neutralizing phytic acid, sprouting assists in the body’s absorption of calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc:

Calcium: Calcium is a mineral which assists in blood-clotting, muscle locomotion, transmission of nerve impulses, activation of enzymes and hormone secretion.

Magnesium: Magnesium is a mineral which helps with muscle relaxation and energy release and is a catalyst for important metabolic reactions. Magnesium is a coenzyme to help your body build proteins and produce serotonin. Magnesium also prevents constipation.


Iron: Iron’s major function is to combine with protein and copper in making hemoglobin. Hemoglobin transports oxygen in the blood from the lungs to the tissues which need oxygen to maintain basic life functions. Iron builds up the quality of the blood and increases resistance to stress and disease. It is also necessary for the formation of myoglobin which is found only in muscle tissue. Myoglobin supplies oxygen to muscle cells for use in the chemical reaction that results in muscle contraction. Iron also prevents fatigue and promotes good skin tone.

Zinc: Called the intelligence mineral, zinc is required for mental development. It is an antioxidant nutrient; is necessary for protein synthesis and wound healing; vital for the development of the reproductive organs, prostate functions and male hormone activity; it governs the contractility of muscles; important for blood stability; maintains the body's alkaline balance; helps in normal tissue function; aids in the digestion and metabolism of phosphorus.

The bottom line: Soaking and sprouting your grains, beans, or seeds prior to use is simple and the nutritional benefits are worth it. Here are some tips for getting started—with whole grains, beans, lentils, raw nuts and seeds.

Soaking/Sprouting Tips:

For Whole Grains: For millet, brown rice, oatmeal, amaranth, etc. soak desired amount of grain in an equal amount of water to which you have added 1 Tbsp. raw vinegar, fresh lemon juice, or plain yogurt. (Use 2-3 Tbsp. if you are cooking a large amount of grain.) Cover and let sit at room temperature for at least 7 hours, preferably longer. When ready to cook, add remaining required amount of water or stock and cook. NOTE: To soak whole-grain flours or pancake mixes, follow the same procedure as above but make sure the flour is mixed well with the soaking water.

For Raw Beans and Lentils: Soak desired amount of beans in an equal amount of water to which you’ve added 1 Tbsp. raw vinegar, fresh lemon juice, or plain yogurt. (Use 2-3 Tbsp. if you are cooking a large amount of beans or lentils.) Cover and let sit at room temperature for at least 7 hours, preferably longer. When ready to cook, discard water; add remaining required amount of water or stock and cook.

For Raw Nuts and Seeds: Place raw nuts or seeds in a bowl; add 1 Tbsp. sea salt, and cover with water. Leave at room temperature for 6-8 hours. Drain the water. Place nuts or seeds on a cookie sheet and dry on low heat in the oven. You can also air-dry the nuts or seeds on a towel, but it takes longer to dry them this way.