life-buzz

Infomation market place... A place where knowledge is power... where the brain thrives..

Friday, November 21, 2008

Business: Electronic books - Amazon's new toy

It costs $399, has a silly name, and is an attempt to open up an entirely new product category. It is bound to fail. That is what people said about the iPod in 2001, at least, and that is what sceptics are saying about the Kindle, an electronic-book reader launched this week by Jeff Bezos of Amazon, an online-retailing giant. Will this new gizmo follow in the footsteps of Apple's music-player, and prove an unexpected hit? Like the iPod, it is not the first product of its kind but it adds a few new twists. Books can be bought for $10 from Amazon's online store via a built-in cellular connection, with no need for a PC. The wireless service is free, but users can pay to subscribe to newspaper and magazine articles and blog feeds. Critics say the design is clunky and the Kindle solves a problem that very few people have: the need to carry hundreds of books at once. And who wants an e-book for Christmas? But people were rude about the iPod when it first appeared, too.

-

Nov 22nd 2007
From The Economist print edition

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Rom 11

1 I ASK entonces: ¿Ha rechazado Dios y totalmente desautorizado a su pueblo? Por supuesto que no! ¿Por qué, yo mismo soy israelita, un descendiente de Abraham, un miembro de la tribu de Benjamín! [I Sam. 12:22; Jer. 31:37; 33:24-26; Phil. 3:5.]

2 No, Dios no ha rechazado y desautorizado a su pueblo [cuyo destino] Él ha marcado y nombró foreknown y desde el principio. ¿No saben lo que la Escritura dice de Elías, cómo se invoca a Dios contra Israel?

3 Señor, que han causado la muerte de Su profetas, que han demolido sus altares, y yo solo estoy izquierda, y buscan mi vida.

4 Pero, ¿cuál es la respuesta de Dios a él? He mantenido para mí siete mil hombres que no han doblegado la rodilla a Baal! [I Reyes 19:18.]

5 Así también en el momento actual hay un remanente (una pequeña minoría creer), seleccionados (elegido) por la gracia (de Dios unmerited favor y gracia).

6 Pero si es por la gracia (Su unmerited favor y gracia), ya no es condicionada a obras o cualquier cosa que los hombres lo han hecho. De lo contrario, la gracia ya no sería gracia [que no tendría sentido].

7 ¿Qué entonces [vamos a concluir]? Israel no obtener lo que solicita [el favor de Dios por la obediencia a la ley]. Sólo los elegidos (los pocos elegidos) obtenido, mientras que el resto de ellos se convirtió en callously indiferente (ciego, endurecido, insensible e hizo de ella).

8 Como está escrito, Dios les dio un espíritu (una actitud) de estupor, ojos que no ven y oídos que no oyen, [que ha continuado] hasta el día de hoy.

9 Y David dice: Que su mesa (su fiesta, banquetes) convertirse en una insidia y una trampa, una trampa y una [retribución justa [repuntando como un boomerang sobre ellos];

10 Deje que sus ojos se oscureció (atenuados) a fin de que no puede ver, y hacer que doblar la espalda [stooping debajo de su carga] para siempre.

11 Por lo tanto, pido, ¿Han tropezado para caer [a su total ruina espiritual, irremediablemente]? De ninguna manera! Pero a través de su paso en falso y la transgresión salvación [se ha] a los gentiles, a fin de despertar Israel [a ver y sentir lo que perderá el derecho] y de manera que sean celos.

12 Ahora bien, si su tropiezo (su caducidad, su transgresión) ha enriquecido el mundo [en general], y si [Israel] la falta de medios tales riquezas de los gentiles, lo que parece un enriquecimiento y una mayor ventaja seguirá su plena reincorporación!

13 Pero ahora me dirijo a ustedes que son gentiles. En la medida entonces como yo soy apóstol a los gentiles, me dan mucha importancia el estrés en mi ministerio y ampliar mi oficina,

14 Con la esperanza de que mis colegas celosos Judios [con el fin de remover hasta que imitar, copiar y apropiado], y, por tanto, la gestión para salvar algunos de ellos.

15 Porque si su rechazo y la exclusión de los beneficios de la salvación se [anulado] para la reconciliación de un mundo a Dios, lo que su aceptación y la admisión? [Será nada menos que] la vida de entre los muertos!

16 Ahora bien, si el primer puñado de masa como el que ofrece primicias [Abraham y los patriarcas] está consagrada (santa), por lo que es toda la masa [de la nación de Israel], y si la raíz [Abraham] es consagrada (santa), por lo que son las ramas.

17 Pero si algunas de las ramas se rompieron, mientras que usted, un brote de olivo silvestre, injertadas en entre ellos para compartir la riqueza [de la raíz y savia] del olivo,

18 No se cuenta con más de las ramas y su orgullo a sus expensas. Si lo hace presumir y sentirse superior, recuerde que no es usted el apoyo que la raíz, la raíz, sino [que apoya].

19 Ustedes dirán entonces, las ramas fueron rotas (poda) fuera para que yo pudiera ser injertadas en!

20 Eso es cierto. Pero ellos estaban rotas (poda) fuera a causa de su incredulidad (su falta de verdadera fe), y que se establezcan a través de la fe [porque usted hacer creer]. Así que no se siente orgulloso y arrogante, sino de pie en temor y miedo se reverentemente.

21 Porque si Dios no perdonó las ramas naturales [a causa de la incredulidad], ni va a escatimar ustedes [si son culpables del mismo delito].

22 Entonces nota y agradecemos el gentil bondad y la severidad de Dios: severidad hacia los que han caído, pero Dios la gracia a usted la bondad - siempre y cuando continúe en su gracia y permanezco en Su bondad, de lo contrario también será cortado (poda de distancia).

23 Y aun los otros [los caídos ramas, Judios], si no persisten en [aferrándose a] su incredulidad, serán injertados, por Dios tiene el poder de injerto en ellos de nuevo.

24 Porque si se han reducido de lo que es por naturaleza un olivo silvestre, y contra naturaleza injertado en un olivo cultivado, ¿cuánto más fácil será para estos injerto natural [ramas] volver a [la matriz de valores de] sus propio olivo.

25 Para que usted se auto-opiniones (sabio en tu propia conceits), no quiero que pierda esta verdad escondida y misteriosa, hermanos: un endurecimiento (insensibilidad) [temporalmente] caído sobre una parte de Israel [último] hasta que el [c] número completo de la ingathering de los Gentiles ha llegado a,

26 Y así todo Israel se salvará. Como está escrito, se entregará al portador proceden de Sión, él desterrar ungodliness de Jacob.

27 Y este será mi pacto (Mi acuerdo) con ellos cuando voy a quitar sus pecados.

28 Desde el punto de vista del Evangelio (buenas noticias), ellos [los Judios, en la actualidad] son enemigos [de Dios], que es para su beneficio y ventaja. Pero desde el punto de vista de la elección divina (de la elección, de selección divina), siguen siendo la amada (muy querida para él) en aras de sus antepasados.

29 Por los regalos de Dios y de Su llamamiento son irrevocables. [Él nunca cuando se retire una vez que se han dado, y Él no cambia su opinión acerca de aquellos a quienes Él da su gracia o para que Él envía su palabra.]

30 Del mismo modo que una vez que estuvo desobediente y rebelde hacia Dios, pero ahora han obtenido [su] misericordia, a través de su desobediencia,

31 Así que también ahora se están desobedientes [cuando usted recibe misericordia], que a su vez, puede un día, a través de la misericordia que está disfrutando, también reciben la misericordia [de que puedan compartir la misericordia que ha demostrado a usted - a través de usted como mensajeros del Evangelio a ellos].

32 Para Dios ha consignado (encerradas a) todos los hombres a la desobediencia, que sólo Él puede tener misericordia de todos ellos [por igual].

33 ¡Oh, la profundidad de las riquezas y la sabiduría y el conocimiento de Dios! ¿Cómo insondable (inescrutable, unsearchable) son Sus sentencias (Sus decisiones)! ¿Y cómo encontrar (misterioso, undiscoverable) son sus caminos (sus métodos, sus caminos)!

34 Para que ha conocido la mente del Señor y que ha entendido su pensamiento, o que tiene un [nunca] sido su consejero?

35 o que haya dado a Dios todo lo que él podría ser devueltas o que podía reclamar una recompensa?

36 A partir de Él y por Él y para Él son todas las cosas. [Por todas las cosas proceden con Él y proceden de Él; todas las cosas en vivo a través de Él, y todas las cosas en el centro y tienden a consumar y para poner fin a Él.] Él se gloria por siempre! Amén (así sea).

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Economics Focus: On the poverty line

Has “a dollar a day” had its day?

IN DECEMBER 2007 the World Bank unveiled the results of the biggest exercise in window shopping in history. Scouts in 146 countries scoured stalls, supermarkets and mail-order catalogues, recording the price of more than 1,000 items, from 500-gram packets of durum spaghetti to low-heeled ladies' shoes.

This vast enterprise enabled the bank to compare the purchasing power of many countries in 2005. It uncovered some statistical surprises. Prices in China, for example, were much higher than earlier estimates had indicated, which meant the Chinese income in 2005 of 18.4 trillion yuan ($2.2 trillion at then-market exchange rates) could buy less than previously thought. At a stroke, the Chinese economy shrank, in real terms, by 40%.

Since then, many scholars have wondered what this economic demotion means for the bank's global poverty counts. It famously draws the poverty line at “a dollar a day”, or more precisely $1.08 at 1993 purchasing-power parity (PPP). In other words, a person is poor if they consume less than an American spending $1.08 per day in 1993. By this yardstick 969m people suffered from absolute poverty in 2004, a drop of over 270m since 1990. The world owed this progress largely to China, where poverty fell by almost 250m from 1990 to 2004.

But if the Chinese economy was 40% smaller than previously thought, surely its poverty count must be correspondingly higher. Surjit Bhalla, of Oxus Investments, speculated that China's toll would increase by more than 300m. He mischievously accused the bank's number-crunchers of conspiring to lift the poverty count so as to keep their employer in business beyond its natural life.


The dollar-a-day definition of global destitution made its debut in the bank's 1990 World Development Report. It was largely the discovery of Martin Ravallion, a researcher at the bank, and two co-authors, who noticed that the national poverty lines of half-a-dozen developing countries clustered around that amount. In two working papers* published this week, Mr Ravallion and two colleagues, Shaohua Chen and Prem Sangraula, revisit the dollar-a-day line in light of the bank's new estimates of purchasing power. They also provide a new count of China's poor.

Thanks to American inflation, $1.08 in 1993 was worth about $1.45 in 2005 money. In principle, the researchers could count the number of people living on less than this amount, converted into local money using the bank's new PPP rates. But $1.45 a day strikes the authors as a bit high. Rather than update their poverty line, they propose to abandon it. It is time, they say, to return to first principles, repeating the exercise Mr Ravallion performed almost two decades ago, using the better, more abundant data available now.

They gather 75 national poverty lines, ranging from Senegal's severe $0.63 a day to Uruguay's more generous measure of just over $9. From this collection, they pick the 15 lowest (Nepal, Tajikistan and 13 sub-Saharan countries) and split the difference between them. The result is a new international poverty line of $1.25 a day.

Why those 15? The answer is philosophical, as well as practical. In setting their poverty lines, most developing countries aim to count people who are poor in an absolute sense. The line is supposed to mark the minimum a person needs to feed, clothe and shelter himself. In Zambia, say, a poor person is defined as someone who cannot afford to buy at least two to three plates of nshima (a kind of porridge), a sweet potato, a few spoonfuls of oil, a handful of groundnuts and a couple of teaspoons of sugar each day, plus a banana and a chicken twice a week.

But even in quite poor countries, a different concept of poverty also seems to creep in, the authors argue. It begins to matter whether a person is poor relative to his countrymen; whether he can appear in public without shame, as Adam Smith put it.

This notion of relative deprivation seems to carry weight in countries once they grow past a consumption of $1.95 per person a day. Beyond this threshold, a country that is $1 richer will tend to have a poverty line that is $0.33 higher (see chart). The authors thus base their absolute poverty line on the 15 countries in their sample below this threshold.


How many people in the world are poor by this new definition? The authors are not yet ready to say. But they have taken another look at China. By their new standard, they find that 204m Chinese people were poor in 2005, about 130m more than previously thought.

That is the bad news. The brighter news is that China's progress against poverty is no less impressive than previously advertised. By Mr Ravallion's and Ms Chen's new standard, the number of poor in China fell by almost 407m from 1990 to 2004, compared with the previous estimate of almost 250m.

China's economic co-ordinates may be different than thought, but its trajectory is much the same. And therein lies a lesson. Give or take a dime or two, it matters little where a poverty line is drawn. Like a line in the sand, an absolute poverty standard shows whether the economic tide is moving in or out. It does not matter too much where on the beach it is drawn.

For practical purposes, policymakers will always care more about their own national poverty lines than the bank's global standard. The dollar-a-day line is more of a campaigning tool than a guide to policy. And as a slogan, $1.25 just doesn't have the same ring to it. A better option might be to reset the poverty line at $1 in 2005 PPP, which would line up reasonably well with at least ten countries in the authors' sample. In adding a quarter to the dollar-a-day poverty line, the researchers may cut its popular appeal by half.


*“Dollar a day revisited”. Working Paper 4620.

China is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty”. Working Paper 4621.

-

May 22nd 2008
From The Economist print edition

Monday, June 16, 2008

Taking Over

God answered the Israelites’ prayer for a quick fix, for an early deliverance from God’s maturity process, but it cost them dearly. When they complained about the difficulty of their trial and longed for the good old days of slavery under Pharaoh when they had meat to eat, God gave them quail— and He also sent leanness to their souls. (See Psalm 106:13–15.) He was saying, “You got out too quickly. This was all part of your training. I know when it’s time to bring you out of this, and I know what I’m doing. Since you feel you know better, you can reap what you have sown.”

I tell the people at my church: “If you’re going through something difficult, if you feel that you are going through hell, I have one piece of advice for you: Don’t stop. Ask God, ‘What is it You are trying to teach me? What is it You want to show me through this?’”

The church is not here to bail everybody out of their problems. This may sound radical and even heretical to you, but I have to tell you that everywhere I see great victory, faith and accomplishments in God’s Word, I also see great perseverance in the face of great suffering. It is my conviction that when we preach against the process of maturity in the Christian life, we preach against the order of God.

God is trying to help us grow up by marching us into such levels of maturity that we will be able to accomplish His purposes on this earth. It can only be done with the “Godkind-of-faith.”

—Eddie Long

Lord, I want to grow up. I choose today to embrace Your dealings rather than run from them.

Eddie Long, Taking Over (1999), 101–102.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Recognize Your Calling

That is why I would remind you to stir up (rekindle the embers of, fan the flame of, and keep burning) the [gracious] gift of God, [the inner fire] that is in you.
2 Timothy 1:6

Before I knew I was called to preach, I would privately repreach entire sermons I had just heard, thinking, I would have said this, and, I would have done that. Then, I would think, Women don’t preach! But my spirit was stirred by the preacher’s anointing because I had the same anointing.

If you are called to do something, you will get stirred up in the presence of someone operating in that same anointing. For example, if you have an anointing to lead worship, or to do special music, you will probably get more excited about the music than the sermon being preached. When in doubt, ask God to make clear your calling.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Prepare The Way

Many people use the excuse that they don’t need to worship the Lord in the scriptural, demonstrative ways He has ordained because they are worshiping Him “in their hearts, in their own way.” However, it is not enough to simply say that we are worshiping God “in our hearts.” He commands that we worship Him outwardly, in the midst of the congregation.

I heard this comment for years in reference to dancing in worship: “It doesn’t matter how high you jump. It matters how straight you walk when you come down.” This statement and the attitude it conveys are used too often to support a mind-set that says it doesn’t really matter if you worship outwardly and demonstratively or not, as long as your “heart is right.”

This is simply not true. Part of our obedience, part of our heart being right, is following the scriptural mandates of worship. Obviously, all the singing, shouting, dancing and clapping we do is vain and empty if our hearts are hard and our spirits polluted.

But if we are not worshiping the Lord in outward, demonstrative, biblically prescribed ways, could it be that it is a result of our sin or unresolved pain? Do we refuse to dance because we will look foolish? That could be evidence of pride.

God wants us free. And while dancing in worship is certainly not a guarantee of inner freedom, there is deliverance and release that comes when we give our inhibitions and fears to God and worship Him in this way.

—Robert Stearns



Lord, help me to forget about what people think so I can please You through exuberant praise.

Robert Stearns, Robert Stearns, Prepare The Way (1999), 172–173.


A New Desire

For I endorse and delight in the Law of God in my inmost self [with my new nature].
Romans 7:22

When we are born again, we get a new “want to.” The law says we “have to, should, and ought to,” but we want to do the right thing because God has put a new heart in us to replace the hard stony one that used to be indifferent to Him and His will (See Ezekiel 36:26).

Learn to recognize the difference between the desires of your flesh and the desires placed in you by the Holy Spirit. Psalm 1:1–2 says, “BLESSED (HAPPY, fortunate, prosperous, and enviable) is the man who walks and lives not in the counsel of the ungodly . . . But his delight and desire are in the law of the Lord, and on His law (the precepts, the instructions, the teachings of God) he habitually meditates (ponders and studies) by day and by night.”

Monday, June 09, 2008

Battle Field of The Mind

I. Mental Strongholds

A. 2 Corinthians 10:4-5 – For the weapons of our warfare are not physical [weapons of the flesh and blood], but they are mighty before God for the overthrow and destruction of strongholds, [Inasmuch as we] refute arguments and theories and reasonings and every proud and lofty thing that sets itself up against the [true] knowledge of God; and we lead every thought and purpose away captive into the obedience of Christ (the Messiah, the Anointed One) . . .

1. Satan relentlessly seeks to build strongholds in our minds.

He is a liar and he only lies or twists the truth, which is lying. He deceives. We are deceived when we believe things that are not true.

2. We have weapons with which to defeat him.

3. It is a spiritual war we are fighting, and our weapons are spiritual. This war cannot be fought in a normal way.

4. We can’t hit Satan, shoot him, strangle him, tie him up with a rope, or put him in jail; but we can defeat him.

B. What is a stronghold?

1. An area that is dominated by an enemy

2. If Satan dominates your attitude toward yourself, God, food, or money, etc., he is in control in that area.

BATTLEFIELD OF THE MIND 1

C. Our Weapons


1. John 8:31-32 and Hebrews 4:12 – God’s Word believed, meditated upon, heard, spoken out loud, and read is a weapon.

2. Luke 4:1-13

a. Jesus was following the Holy Spirit when Satan attacked.

b. Satan attacked Him when He was tired and weak.

c. Satan tried to make Him question who He was.

d. Satan showed Him what the world had to offer. He wanted Jesus to think about what He did not have right now and what He could have with a little compromise.

1) Matthew 4:8
2) I John 2:15-17
3) I John 3:17

e. Satan offered Jesus power, authority, and things in exchange for one little compromise.

f. Satan once again attacks Jesus’ identity: “If you are God’s child, then let’s see you get yourself out of this mess!”

Romans 8:36-39

g. IMMEDIATELY following EACH lie of Satan, Jesus used His spiritual weapon of the Word of God.

D. The Weapon of Praise and Worship

1. Romans 4:18-22

a. Praise is thanking God for what He has done – talking about His goodness, mercy, and power; singing to Him or about Him.

BATTLEFIELD OF THE MIND 2

It can be expressed in enthusiastic body language, clapping, twirling, jumping, up-lifted hands, head bowed, etc.

b. Some people would experience freedom if they would be more enthusiastic and expressive.

2. II Chronicles 20:17-22 – As the people worshiped God, the enemy became confused and was self-slaughtered.

Praise is more involved with thanking God for Who He is.

Worship is adoration; it goes deeper than praise. Worship would usually be more quiet and reverent, while praise is more jubilant and a bit noisy.

3. David repeatedly said: “I WILL praise God. I WILL worship.” You can begin by decision, and your feelings will start to change gradually.

E. The Weapon of Prayer

1. James 4:2 – You have not because you ask not.

2. Luke 22:40-46 – Jesus prayed during His suffering, temptation, and agony of mind.

II. A Deceived Mind Produces A Deceived Life.

A. Genesis 3:1-6 – Eve was deceived by the lies of Satan. He attacked her mind.

1. Eve should have checked her heart.

B. Matthew 24:4 – See that no one deceives you and leads you astray.

C. I Corinthians 3:18 – Let no person deceive himself by thinking he knows it all.

1. Worldly wisdom and philosophy are worth nothing if they disagree with God’s Word.

BATTLEFIELD OF THE MIND 3

D. James 1:22 – Reasoning causes us to deceive ourselves.

E. The worldly person wants to understand everything mentally.

1. An atheist or agnostic won’t believe because they can’t see God or figure Him out. They want control of their lives.

2. Not believing in God is often just an excuse for one not being willing to change their lifestyle.
.
F. Romans 10:10-11 – With the heart (not the head) a person believes and is justified and made right with God.

III. The Renewing Of The Mind Is A Vital Necessity.

A. Romans 12:2 – Our mind must be renewed if we want to experience God’s good plan.

B. Ephesians 4:23 – Mind and attitude must be renewed daily.

C. Proverbs 23:7 – As a man thinks, so is he.

1. Where the mind goes, the man follows.

D. Colossians 3:2 – Set your mind and keep it set on what is above (high things), not on low earthly things.

E. It is a process, so don’t give up!

IV. Be Positive – Think On Good Things.

A. Believe the best, not the worst.

B. Matthew 8:13 – It shall be done for you as you believe.

C. A negative mind produces a negative life.

D. A positive mind produces a positive life!

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Daily Tune-up:The Father's Blessing

Years ago I talked with God about the cross, and I asked Him why Jesus had to suffer so much. The Father showed me something very precious. I believe Jesus actually bled to death during His crucifixion.

All those hours on the cross, His precious blood flowed from those fresh wounds until He was about to pass out from the loss of blood. At that moment, the Father took the sins of the world and placed them upon that broken, emaciated body, and Jesus became sin who knew no sin. God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God (2 Cor. 5:21).

Jesus had been bleeding profusely for six hours. His blood had already been poured out before the sins of the world were placed upon Him. That holy blood was never contaminated by the sins of the world. His blood remains holy, untouched by your sins and mine. It is as pure and holy as ever, full of mercy and life. It was His body that was broken and contaminated.

That is why the Book of Hebrews says the blood of Jesus cries better things than the blood of Abel (12:24). The blood of Abel was crying out for revenge: “God, do something. My brother has murdered me.”

But what does the blood of Jesus cry? “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do. For these guilty people, Lord, I will provide the way to mercy. I will take their place. Let mercy be given them.”

—John Arnott

Lord, thank You that the blood of Jesus will forever have the power to cleanse me from the guilt of sin.


Sources

John Arnott, The Father's Blessing (1995), 212–213.

Starting Your Day Right: Follow God's Spirit

And He Who searches the hearts of men knows
what is in the mind of the [Holy] Spirit [what His intent is], because the Spirit intercedes and pleads [before God] in behalf of the saints according to and in harmony with God’s will.

Romans 8:27

Many people follow their own desires or other people’s advice instead of following the Spirit of God. The Holy Spirit is given to each one of us to lead us into the fullness of our destiny, and into the fullness of what Jesus died to give us.

Your faith in Jesus gives you the promise of heaven, but God wants to work all things together for your good in this life too (See Romans 8:28). Don’t be satisfied with receiving half of what Jesus died to give you. Follow the Spirit’s leading so that you will get all that God has for you. Seek God for clear guidance to remain right in the center of His perfect will for every single day.

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Starting Your Day Right: Devotions for Each Morning of the Year

Whatever may be your task, work at it heartily (from the soul), as [something done] for the Lord and not for men, knowing [with all certainty] that it is from the Lord [and not from men] that you will receive the inheritance which is your [real] reward.
Colossians 3:23

Jesus died so that you can enjoy abundant life, not just the days you are off work or on vacation or when you get to go shopping or golfing—but every day of your life.

He wants you to enjoy going to the grocery store. He wants you to enjoy driving the kids to school. He wants you to enjoy paying the bills. He wants you to enjoy cleaning the house or mowing the yard.

You can enjoy life if you determine to do so. Say, “I am going to enjoy every aspect of my life, because Jesus died so that I could have joy unspeakable and full of glory.”

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Correspondent's Diary: Education in Sweden and Finland - Our friends in the north

Finding the secret to educational success

Monday

THE best schools in the world, it is generally agreed, are in Finland. In the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) studies, which compare 15-year-olds' reading, mathematics and science abilities in more than 50 countries, it routinely comes top. So politicians, academics, think-tankers and teachers from all over the world visit Finnish schools in the hope of discovering the magic ingredient. Journalists come too, and now it’s my turn.

And since I'm coming this far north, I want to take in Sweden too. That social-democratic paradise has carried out school reforms that make free-market ideologues the world over weak at the knees. In the 1990s it opened its state-education system to private competition, allowing new schools to receive the same amount for each pupil as the state would have spent on that child.

Sweden is my first stop. My week starts with post-breakfast coffee with Widar Andersson, an ex-chairman of Sweden’s Independent Schools Association. When the independent schools reforms were first mooted in 1991, he was a member of parliament for the Social Democrats, in one of their rare spells in opposition. “I think I was the only Social Democrat in favour of the reforms,” he tells me.

In 1994, when they came into force, he and two state-school teachers opened one of the very first independent schools. It was not the first time he took on the state: years earlier he and a few other social workers had set up a private company trying innovative ways to treat drug addicts. “I learned there must be other ways to do things than those the state has decided are right, especially in a country like Sweden where the state is so large,” he says.

Then I head to the education ministry. The minister is in budget negotiations, but his officials brief me on the new government's plans (a centre-right coalition is once more in power). Copying Finland seems to be the name of the game: more teacher training, and lots of special-needs teaching. It must be galling to live next door to the world’s best schools, especially when to the rest of the world, the two countries look essentially identical.

Back in London, a Russian acquaintance who lived in Sweden for many years had offered me his explanation for the gap in school achievement between Finland and Sweden: Finland never did the 70s, he says, while the Swedes did it wholesale and are still stuck there. Swedish teachers can’t even take a child’s mobile phone away if he is using it during class, he fumes. Bertil Östberg, State Secretary to Jan Björklund, the education minister, laughs and agrees; apparently the great mobile-phone-in-class scandal was an issue in a previous election campaign. “We will give teachers the right to confiscate mobile phones,” he assures me.

I hear that the 1970s orthodoxy—that competition and grades destroyed a child's motivation—means that Swedish children who are failing to learn can proceed right through compulsory school without anyone intervening or even noticing. If parents ask for a report, they can be given one—but it mustn’t include anything that looks like a grade. I offer the sort of fatuity I imagine such documents include: “Helen has contributed nicely to classroom discussion”. It is acknowledged as a classic of the genre. The new government, I am told, will make grades and reports not only legal, but compulsory.

Next, a visit to Sodra Latin (South Latin), a popular and prestigious gymnasium (upper high school, for 16-19-year-olds). Education at this age is not compulsory, and although Sodra Latin is a state school, entry is highly competitive. It is particularly strong in music, with chamber and symphony orchestras, a jazz band and an excellent choir. The youngsters are clever and motivated. But, says the head teacher, it is the first time most have experienced competition, and many study late—the school is open till 10pm—and come in at weekends too.

I dine with Carl-Gustaf Stawström, the managing director of the Association of Independent Schools. He gives me a nice example of the way the market is providing choice and variety, as well as pressure for higher standards. His own daughter attends an independent gymnasium which crams most schooling into half-days. “If you want only to find problems, you see people who are trying to do things cheaply,” he says, “but she is a keen athlete and trains in the afternoons, so it suits her very well.”


I SPEND my second day in Sweden with representatives of Kunskapsskolan, Sweden's biggest chain of independent schools (it has 21 secondaries and 9 gymnasiums). It has recently been awarded a contract to open two “academies”—independent state schools—in London, and I have been intrigued by what I’ve heard about its highly personalised teaching methods.

At Kunskapsskolan Enskede, a few kilometres from the centre of Stockholm, I am met by Christian Wetell, its head teacher, and Kenneth Nyman, the company's regional chief. They explain the “voucher system” from which they make their money. For each pupil the school teaches, it receives from the local government what it would have spent educating the pupil in one of its own schools; in return, independent schools cannot charge anything extra, and must accept all students who apply. Provided schools follow Sweden’s national curriculum, they have wide latitude in their methods and pacing.

Consumers consuming


Kenneth sheds an interesting light on the thorny comparison with Finland. You have to look, he says, at what sort of students each country’s system wants. Sweden aims to produce socially conscious generalists. The Finnish system, by contrast, drives rather narrowly at academic success.

We talk about the unwritten rules which children pick up by osmosis. Sweden has a Lutheran tradition: citizens are expected to work hard, do their share, solve their own problems and contribute to the general good. “The limit to freedom,” he says, “is when you negatively affect others.” Sweden's national culture thus constrains its students' apparent freedom.

Christian shows me around his school. It is bare but pleasant, with lecture theatres, open areas where students work at their own pace and classrooms with doors for tutorials.

Kunskapsskolan posts the entire curriculum on a website. Each week students agree on their goals for the next week, and the timetable of classes and lectures they will attend, individually with a tutor. They do most of the work on their own. The following week their progress will be reviewed. I am shown a student's logbook for the past term; mostly, progress has been uneventful, but on one page is the dire warning that this young person will have to work all Easter to catch up. A few weeks later, to my relief, there is a smiley face and a message: “Well done! You're back on track.”

“If I compare myself with my friends who went to a regular school,” Teo Derviskadic, a boy in his final year, tells me, “it feels I have matured more; I plan my days better. They ask me, how you can keep up, how can you decide where to be? But some kids here have missed out, because they didn't learn to take responsibility.”

After school lunch (delicious), Per Ledin, the company's CEO, takes me on to Kunskapsskolan Globen, a gymnasium nearby. Looking directly at me to see how I react, he says: “We do not mind that we are being compared to McDonald's.”

Education is a service industry; to turn a profit, a service industry needs customers. “So you only make a profit by being popular, like a hotel, which only makes money if it has guests in most rooms most nights.”

Next, he drives me to meet Peje Emilsson, one of Kunskapsskolan's founders and chairman of its board. He tells me about the company’s move into England. “Personalisation is a buzz-word among British school leaders. They recognise that will be difficult with corridors and classrooms and teachers at the front.”

Peje's interest in education reform was sparked when his daughter's state school refused to let her switch from a mathematics programme to social sciences (“We need more girls in mathematics,” they told her). She moved to one of Sweden's few private schools. As I take a taxi to the airport for my flight to Helsinki, I reflect that it's hard to imagine any Swedish school—state or independent—treating a valued customer like that today.

Back to top >>


I AM feeling nostalgic. I spent two years in Finland in the late 1990s on a European Union post-doctoral fellowship at the University of Jyvaskyla in central Finland, and haven't been back since. I wonder how much things will have changed—the country had only just joined the European Union back then, and has since joined the euro and experienced an economic boom.

First stop this morning is Kulosaari comprehensive school, in a suburb of Helsinki. Finnish comprehensives teach children from seven to 16; after that almost all youngsters spend another three years in either grammar or vocational schools.

Kulosaari school is lovely. The children are calm (far calmer than those at my son's primary school in Cambridge, England) and talk to adults respectfully, but as equals.

Rex Features
Rex Features

Benefit from the best


Dan Wood, from Maidstone in England, one of two native English speakers on the staff, teaches children in the school's bilingual programme. He has been in Finland for ten years now, and has no intention of leaving. “My mum works in a school at home,” he tells me. “I really just don’t want to go back to that system, the stress of school inspections.”

One thing surprises me: the number of children being taught in “special education” classes. I am used to children with learning difficulties being integrated into mainstream classes whenever possible. But in Finland, large numbers, including many with behavioural difficulties rather than more strictly medical problems, are taught separately.

Of the 20 children in the two special classes that I see, 18 are boys. I think again of my own nearly-seven-year-old, a clever, naughty little menace who I am sorry to say has caused his teachers and classmates considerable trouble, and wonder in which class this school would put him, and how he would fare there.

The special classes undeniably do a good job: as well as having the world's highest average standards, Finnish schools have one of the smallest gaps between the best-performing students and the worst. But Finland is also proud of its low “between-school variation”—and this looks like my first myth. There certainly is segregation in Finnish education, but it happens between classes, rather than between schools—and very, very early.

After lunch I visit Helsinki’s teacher-training facility. Matti Meri, a professor of pedagogy, tells me that the root of the Finnish education system's success is its extraordinary ability to attract the very best young people into teaching: only around 10% of applicants are accepted for teacher training.

By chance, a group of trainee teachers has met for coffee and a chat after two-week stints teaching abroad. They laugh when a young man who has returned from England tells them that the school emailed him a few weeks before he travelled to inform him of its dress code: no jeans or piercings, no outlandish hairstyles. He has taught in Finland with his hair spiked, in a T-shirt and frayed jeans—and no one raised an eyebrow.

At the National Board of Education, I ask Irmeli Halinen what other countries should learn from Finland. The most important lesson, she says, is to develop excellent initial training for teachers. Second, start education late and gently—Finnish children are seven before they start formal school. And she offers a third lesson: “We don't waste energy or money or time on inspections or national testing.”

I ask her about the system's weaknesses; she tells me getting rid of bad teachers is difficult. Head teachers are trained to handle alcohol problems, and can insist that a teacher attends an alcohol-abuse programme, but it is almost impossible to get rid of them if such help doesn't work. (Alcoholism is a serious problem in Finland, a country cursed—in this respect—with a history that is both Nordic and Russian.)

In Kulosaari, the head teacher, Anneli Rautiainen, said alcoholic teachers in Finland are moved between classes and sometimes even between schools, so that they don't do too much damage to any one child's education. (She hastens to point out this is not a problem she is experiencing.) On the way back to my hotel, I reflect that if Finnish teachers weren't generally so excellent, those inspections and national tests might look a bit more attractive.

Back to top>>


THE OECD's PISA studies are exhibit A for the excellence of Finland’s schools. Finland routinely comes top, or occasionally second, in tests every three years of 15-year-olds' abilities in reading, mathematics and science. It is impressive, but the suspicious-minded (or perhaps just the begrudgers?) wonder if it is really all down to brilliant schools.

I have a suspicion of my own. When I lived in Finland in the 1990s I learnt rather little Finnish (they speak great English, and I'm lazy), but I learnt to read words and say them correctly in about half an hour. Each letter corresponds to one sound, and only one; there are no exceptions and no combinations of letters that make different sounds, like “sh” or “th”. If a letter is repeated, it is simply said for twice as long. Is it, perhaps, just easier to learn to read and write in Finland than practically anywhere else?

AFP
AFP

Finland's high vowel-per-student ratio


This morning I am off to Helsinki University's Centre for Educational Assessment. Jarkko Hautamäki and his colleagues do not reject my theory, but they tell me that in Hong Kong, which also does very well in PISA, Chinese orthography is claimed to be part of the reason! If the same claim is made for both Chinese and Finnish, then either one is wrong or both are insufficient.

Mr Hautamäki and his colleagues believe the latter; they reel off a list of factors they think contribute to Finnish academic success. One is the ubiquity of print: “Almost every family has a newspaper delivered to the home,” he says, “and foreign language programmes are subtitled, not dubbed.”

Another is Finnish diligence. In a country with harsh weather and, until recently, a largely agrarian population, it is understood one must work, and work hard. Students took the PISA tests seriously, leaving very few questions blank. That boosted scores, since there were no marks lost for wrong answers. And Finnish children are good at tests, too, because they get them in school all the time, to help them understand how they are doing. “Tests to Finnish children are important but not scary,” he tells me.

So, I ask him, was Finland's high score a mirage, caused by nothing more profound than sensible spelling and good exam technique? No, he says; the country's schools do two exceptional things—and he can prove it, with charts.

The first shows “inter-generational income elasticity” in various countries. This is the technical term for the correlation between people's income and that of their parents. In Finland it is low: parental income is a minor influence on earning. In other words, Finns switch economic classes easily. In Britain and America, it is high, meaning the opposite. “Finns trust teachers and schools—and this chart shows that we trust them for a reason,” he says. “What Finnish schools do is genuinely effective.”

The second shows the profile of the PISA results in various countries. “Between-student” variation in Finland is extremely low, meaning a narrow gap between the scores of the most able and least able groups. This trick is easy to pull off if standards are uniformly low, but Finland's average is the world's highest, meaning it does almost unbelievably well by its weakest students.

In the afternoon, I go to the Finnish parliament to meet the education minister, Sari Sarkomaa. Before the meeting, I peek into the empty debating chamber. There are large naked figures carved on the walls, one with particularly plump buttocks. It is typical of this utterly unprudish nation. Finns cannot understand the foreign habit of wearing swimming costumes in the sauna (a Finnish invention); Finns pile in naked, family with guests, all generations together.

Ms Sarkomaa is completely—and rightly—obsessed with keeping the status of teachers high. “We will do anything possible to keep the profession attractive,” she says. “Yes, salary is important [teachers did pretty well in the last public-sector pay deal], but many other factors can help. We need to improve the training of school principals. Such highly educated workers want to have highly qualified managers.” If Finnish teachers ever decided to turn militant, they would be able to bring the country to its knees in no time.

Back to top >>


FINLAND'S schools may lead the world, but its universities are nothing special. This bothers the Finnish government. “As a country that thinks its future is purely dependent on its know-how, we cannot afford average results in universities,” says Jyrki Katainen (pictured), the finance minister.

This is my last appointment before I fly back to London, and Mr Katainen is telling me that his government thinks greater independence and a bit of capital may help the country's universities to specialise and innovate. So it has offered any universities willing to set up charitable foundations a deal too good to refuse: any money they raise by 2010, the government will top up by 2.5 times as much.

Reuters
Reuters

Katainen: Equality booster

Finland is hardly the only country worried about the global reputation of its universities. As with schools, the advent of international rankings has made list-watchers of everyone. The Shanghai Jiao Tong and THE rankings are enormously important both for universities, which are increasingly reliant on international students, and for countries, who take their positions on the charts quite seriously.

Most countries have decided that the way to break into the top ranks is to boost a few chosen universities rather than fund all equally. They look to America, which dominates the top of both rankings. Its elite private institutions have enormous endowments and attract top names; small liberal-arts colleges provide a more intimate education; many state universities offer an excellent education at a keen price; and its community colleges give no-frills tuition to locals and often serve as a springboard for future progression.

So, I ask Mr Katainen, does the Finnish government hope to see an elite emerge? The answer is a flat no. That would not be the Finnish way: equality is one of the country's fundamental values

Fees for university study are also off the agenda. “There is not even a debate about this. We think that as a nation we can get the average quite close to the top,” he says coolly. I have my doubts that the same trick can be pulled off with universities as with schools—but if anyone can do it, it will be the Finns.

I leave for the airport with a lot to think about. I've seen two very different ways to organise state schooling, and there's no question which one I preferred.

The problem is, it wasn't the one that produced the best results.

I loved Sweden's profusion of different sorts of schools—surely different methods work for different children. I loved the way competition was forcing schools to think more pointedly about quality—Kunskapsskolan's head teachers know that when a student is unhappy with what they offer, they risk 70,000 kronor walking out the door. And most of all I loved that Swedish parents are in control of state education—municipalities can't close small rural schools against the wishes of local parents in the name of efficiency, for example, because parents would simply threaten to open their own schools.

But it is Finland's no-choice, teacher-knows-best version of schooling that beats the world. That poses challenges, both for my orthodox free-market beliefs and for other countries desperate to bottle the magic and export it.

Can it really be true that if you dismantle schools inspectorates, make it practically impossible to sack teachers and refuse to publish exam results (officials and schools get to see how Finnish students do on national tests; parents and children don't), you can make every school a good school?

Somehow, I doubt it. After all, England's schools could do pretty much what they liked in the 1970s, and many did, with hardly impressive results.

Finland's secret is simple: its teachers are so highly regarded that the very best young people compete for this coveted job. The successful few study for at least five years and are actually taught how to teach (you would be surprised how rare this is on teacher-training courses). And then, once they start work, their students pay attention and work hard (when I asked Finns whether there were some families who despised education and resented schools, they seemed puzzled by the question).

I have seen what works. But I don't know how my country—where anti-intellectualism is rife, and where, sadly, all too often those who can't do, teach—could replicate it.

-

Jun 6th 2008
From Economist.com

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Business: Book publishing in America - Unbound

Publishers worry as new technologies transform their industry

JEFF BEZOS, the founder and chief executive of Amazon, destination for nearly four-fifths of online book buyers, appears harmless. But to some in the publishing industry, he looms like a recurring nightmare. Having upset booksellers' apple-carts in the 1990s with his online stores, he is now widening his assault on the industry, as he personably explained in a speech at Book Expo America (BEA), a trade fair in Los Angeles, on May 30th.

AP
AP

You're all doomed!

From the outside, book publishing looks like an impregnable edifice: 411,000 new titles were published in America last year, and more than 3 billion books sold there. Growth was 4.3% in the “adult trade” segment, the mainstay of the market. In fact, the existing order is fragile. Reading in America, as in many rich countries, is down. A study by the National Endowment for the Arts, an independent federal agency, says leisure reading is declining, especially among the young. Since 1985, books' share of entertainment spending has fallen by seven percentage points.

Books have changed very little in half a millennium, but they may now be on the verge of going digital. The first high-resolution e-book reader, made by Sony, came out in 2004. Last November Amazon launched the Kindle (pictured), a $359 e-book reader with a high-speed wireless link to the firm's online store, allowing e-books to be downloaded in seconds. Mr Bezos says Kindle e-books now account for 6% of sales of the 125,000 titles available in both print and electronic formats.

Though they are an improvement on a computer screen, e-book readers remain crude simulacra of books. A poll released by John Zogby at BEA found that 82% of Americans strongly prefer paper to pixels. None of the handful of e-book manufacturers will divulge sales figures. First-quarter sales of mass-market e-books in America have tripled since the same period in 2005, but they were worth just $10m.

But Kindle and its kind are merely the first generation of a product that is sure to evolve quickly in the coming years. Eventually, e-books point the way towards a cleavage of content from platform, threatening publishing with the wholesale change that has hit the music industry. It is a familiar story: fearing piracy, publishers are already adopting various mutually incompatible security technologies that are sure to annoy readers—although ePub, a new standard backed by many big publishers, may clarify things.

Unlike digital music or video, digital books require consumers to change their consumption habits. In some categories, such as textbooks, digital books are growing rapidly. As well as reducing costs by eliminating printing, warehousing, shipping and returns, this transformation could help publishers such as Elsevier and Springer recapture America's $2.3 billion college textbook-resale market.

Although e-books may one day transform the industry, another new technology that is less visible to readers is already making itself felt. Print on Demand (POD), which allows books to be printed and bound to order, is making millions of books available even if they appeal to only a narrow readership. Here, too, academia leads the way. Stephen DeForge of Ames On-Demand says his POD business, which specialises in printing small runs of customised books for schools and universities, has been growing by 45% a year since 2001. Last year his firm printed more than 800,000 books in runs as small as ten copies at a time.

The opportunity has not been lost on Mr Bezos. In March Amazon announced that it would require all the POD books it sells to be printed by the company at its warehouses. Mr Bezos says that this enables Amazon to have a book ready to ship within two hours of an order being placed online. Between POD and the Kindle, Mr Bezos thinks he can sell “any book ever printed in any language”. But printers and distributors, like booksellers before them, fear the oncoming Amazon juggernaut.

Technology is also opening up new formats. Serialisation is making a comeback: a firm called DailyLit divides e-books into small chunks for drip-feeding by e-mail. Harlequin, a Canadian publisher of romantic fiction, sells short-fiction e-books for reading on PCs or other devices in a lunch hour. Last autumn the firm, which sells around 130m books a year, became the first big publisher to offer its entire catalogue in both printed and digital formats. Brent Lewis, who runs Harlequin's digital business, says his firm's digital readership is composed of the same middle-aged women who read its printed books.

An economic slowdown may play to the new technologies' strengths. The costs of printing and shipping paper and cardboard are rising. Mr DeForge says POD is now cheaper than standard printing for runs of fewer than 1,200 copies, and the threshold is rising quickly. And if consumers become more price-sensitive, e-books may become more appealing. This week's Kindle bestseller, a political memoir by Scott McClellan, a former White House spokesman, can be downloaded from thin air in less than a minute for $9.99. A paper copy costs $15.37 on Amazon's website, and will not be in stock for three weeks.

Publishing has only two indispensable participants: authors and readers. As with music, any technology that brings these two groups closer makes the whole industry more efficient—but hurts those who benefit from the distance between them

-

Jun 5th 2008 | LOS ANGELES
From The Economist print edition

Technology Quarterly: Case history - Tapping the oceans

Environmental technology: Desalination turns salty water into fresh water. As concern over water’s scarcity grows, can it offer a quick technological fix?

THERE are vast amounts of water on earth. Unfortunately, over 97% of it is too salty for human consumption and only a fraction of the remainder is easily accessible in rivers, lakes or groundwater. Climate change, droughts, growing population and increasing industrial demand are straining the available supplies of fresh water. More than 1 billion people live in areas where water is scarce, according to the United Nations, and that number could increase to 1.8 billion by 2025.

One time-tested but expensive way to produce drinking water is desalination: removing dissolved salts from sea and brackish water. Its appeal is obvious. The world’s oceans, in particular, present a virtually limitless and drought-proof supply of water. “If we could ever competitively—at a cheap rate—get fresh water from salt water,” observed President John Kennedy nearly 50 years ago, “that would be in the long-range interest of humanity, and would really dwarf any other scientific accomplishment.”

According to the latest figures from the International Desalination Association, there are now 13,080 desalination plants in operation around the world. Together they have the capacity to produce up to 55.6m cubic metres of drinkable water a day—a mere 0.5% of global water use. About half of the capacity is in the Middle East. Because desalination requires large amounts of energy and can cost several times as much as treating river or groundwater, its use in the past was largely confined to wealthy oil-rich nations, where energy is cheap and water is scarce.

But now things are changing. As more parts of the world face prolonged droughts or water shortages, desalination is on the rise. In California alone some 20 seawater-desalination plants have been proposed, including a $300m facility near San Diego. Several Australian cities are planning or constructing huge desalination plants, with the biggest, near Melbourne, expected to cost about $2.9 billion. Even London is building one. According to projections from Global Water Intelligence, a market-research firm, worldwide desalination capacity will nearly double between now and 2015.

Not everyone is happy about this. Some environmental groups are concerned about the energy the plants will use, and the greenhouse gases they will spew out. A large desalination plant can suck up enough electricity in one year to power more than 30,000 homes.

The good news is that advances in technology and manufacturing have reduced the cost and energy requirements of desalination. And many new plants are being held to strict environmental standards. One recently built plant in Perth, Australia, runs on renewable energy from a nearby wind farm. In addition, its modern seawater-intake and waste-discharge systems minimise the impact on local marine life. Jason Antenucci, deputy director of the Centre for Water Research at the University of Western Australia in Perth, says the facility has “set a benchmark for other plants in Australia.”

References to removing salt from seawater can be found in stories and legends dating back to ancient times. But the first concerted efforts to produce drinking water from seawater were not until the 16th century, when European explorers on long sea voyages began installing simple desalting equipment on their ships for emergency use. These devices tended to be crude and inefficient, and boiled seawater above a stove or furnace.

An important advance in desalination came from the sugar industry. To produce crystalline sugar, large amounts of fuel were needed to heat the sugar sap and evaporate the water it contained. Around 1850 an American engineer named Norbert Rillieux won several patents for a way to refine sugar more efficiently. His idea became what is known today as multiple-effect distillation, and consists of a cascading system of chambers, each at a lower pressure than the one before. This means the water boils at a lower temperature in each successive chamber. Heat from water vapour in the first chamber can thus be recycled to evaporate water in the next chamber, and so on.


This reduced the energy consumption of sugar refining by up to 80%, says James Birkett of West Neck Strategies, a desalination consultancy based in Nobleboro, Maine. But it took about 50 years for the idea to make its way from one industry to another. Only in the late 19th century did multi-effect evaporators for desalination begin to appear on steamships and in arid countries such as Yemen and Sudan.

A few multi-effect distillation plants were built in the first half of the 20th century, but a flaw in the system hampered its widespread adoption. Mineral deposits tended to build up on heat-exchange surfaces, and this inhibited the transfer of energy. In the 1950s a new type of thermal-desalination process, called multi-stage flash, reduced this problem. In this, seawater is heated under high pressure and then passed through a series of chambers, each at a lower pressure than the one before, causing some of the water to evaporate or “flash” at each step. Concentrated seawater is left at the bottom of the chambers, and freshwater vapour condenses above. Because evaporation does not happen on the heat-exchange surfaces, fewer minerals are deposited.

Countries in the Middle East with a lot of oil and a little water soon adopted multi-stage flash. Because it needs hot steam, many desalination facilities were put next to power stations, which generate excess heat. For a time, the cogeneration of electricity and water dominated the desalination industry.

Research into new ways to remove salt from water picked up in the 1950s. The American government set up the Office of Saline Water to support the search for desalination technology. And scientists at the University of Florida and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) began to investigate membranes that are permeable to water, but restrict the passage of dissolved salts.

Such membranes are common in nature. When there is a salty solution on one side of a semi-permeable membrane (such as a cell wall), and a less salty solution on the other, water diffuses through the membrane from the less concentrated side to the more concentrated side. This process, which tends to equalise the saltiness of the two solutions, is called osmosis. Researchers wondered whether osmosis could be reversed by applying pressure to the more concentrated solution, causing water molecules to diffuse through the membrane and leave behind even more highly concentrated brine.

Initial efforts showed only limited success, producing tiny amounts of fresh water. That changed in 1960, when Sidney Loeb and Srinivasa Sourirajan of UCLA hand-cast their own membranes from cellulose acetate, a polymer used in photographic film. Their new membranes boasted a dramatically improved flux (the rate at which water molecules diffuse through a membrane of a given size) leading, in 1965, to a small “reverse osmosis” plant for desalting brackish water in Coalinga, California.

The energy requirements for thermal desalination do not much depend on the saltiness of the source water, but the energy needed for reverse osmosis is directly related to the concentration of dissolved salts. The saltier the water, the higher the pressure it takes (and hence the more energy you need) to push water through a membrane in order to leave behind the salt. Seawater generally contains 33-37 grams of dissolved solids per litre. To turn it into drinking water, nearly 99% of these salts must be removed. Because brackish water contains less salt than seawater, it is less energy-intensive, and thus less expensive, to process. As a result, reverse osmosis first became established as a way to treat brackish water.

Another important distinction is that reverse osmosis, unlike thermal desalination, calls for extensive pre-treatment of the feed water. Reverse-osmosis plants use filters and chemicals to remove particles that could clog up the membranes, and the membranes must also be washed periodically to reduce scaling and fouling.


In the late 1970s John Cadotte of America’s Midwest Research Institute and the FilmTec Corporation created a much-improved membrane by using a special cross-linking reaction between two chemicals atop a porous backing material. His composite membrane consisted of a very thin layer of polyamide, to perform the separation, and a sturdy support beneath it. Thanks to the membrane’s improved water flux, and its ability to tolerate pH and temperature variations, it went on to dominate the industry. At around the same time, the first reverse-osmosis plants for seawater began to appear. These early plants needed a lot of energy. The first big municipal seawater plant, which began operating in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 1980, required more than 8 kilowatt hours (kWh) to produce one cubic metre of drinking water.

The energy consumption of such plants has since fallen dramatically, thanks in large part to energy-recovery devices. High-pressure pumps force seawater against a membrane, which is typically arranged in a spiral inside a tube, to increase the surface area exposed to the incoming water and optimise the flux through the membrane. About half of the water emerges as freshwater on the other side. The remaining liquid, which contains the leftover salts, shoots out of the system at high pressure. If that high-pressure waste stream is run through a turbine or rotor, energy can be recovered and used to pressurise the incoming seawater.

The energy-recovery devices in the 1980s were only about 75% efficient, but newer ones can recover about 96% of the energy from the waste stream. As a result, the energy use for reverse-osmosis seawater desalination has fallen. The Perth plant, which uses technology from Energy Recovery, a firm based in California, consumes only 3.7kWh to produce one cubic metre of drinking water, according to Gary Crisp, who helped to oversee the plant’s design for the Water Corporation, a local utility. Thermal plants suck up nearly as much electricity, but also need large amounts of steam. “A thermal plant only is practical if you can build it in such a way that it can take advantage of very low-cost or waste heat,” says Tom Pankratz, a water consultant based in Texas, who is also a board member of the International Desalination Association.

Economies of scale, better membranes and improved energy-recovery have helped to bring down the cost of reverse-osmosis seawater-desalination. Although the cost of desalination plants and their water depends on where they are, as well as the local costs of capital and operations, prices decreased from roughly $1.50 a cubic metre in the early 1990s to around 50 cents in 2003, says Mr Pankratz. As a result, reverse osmosis is preferred for most modern seawater-desalination (though rising energy and commodity prices mean the cost per cubic metre has now risen to around 75 cents). Experts reckon that further gains in energy efficiency, and hence cost reductions, will be increasingly difficult, however. According to a recent report on desalination from America’s National Research Council, energy use is unlikely to be reduced by much more than 15% below today’s levels—though that would still be worthwhile, it concludes.



Sometimes, using desalination within water management may be the only way to ensure supply.

To achieve these reductions, researchers want to find better membranes that allow water to pass through more easily and are less likely to get clogged up. Eric Hoek and his colleagues from UCLA, for example, have developed a membrane embedded with tiny particles containing narrow flow channels, producing a significant increase in water flux. The membrane’s smooth surface is also expected to make it harder for bacteria to latch onto. Depending on a plant’s design, the new membranes could reduce total energy consumption by as much as 20%, reckons Dr Hoek. The technology is being commercialised by NanoH2O, a company on UCLA’s campus.

Meanwhile, the possibility of making membranes out of carbon nanotubes, which consist of sheets of carbon atoms rolled up into tubes, has also garnered attention. A study published in the journal Science in 2006 demonstrated unexpectedly high water-flow rates. But insiders think it will be a decade before the idea is ready for commercialisation.

As desalination becomes more widespread, its environmental impacts, including the design of intake and discharge structures, are coming under increased scrutiny. Some of the damage can be mitigated fairly easily. Reducing the intake velocity enables most fish species and other mobile marine life to swim away from the intake system, though small animals, such as plankton or fish larvae, may still get caught in the intake screens or sucked into the plant.


A bigger problem may be the leftover brine, which typically contains twice as much salt as seawater and is discharged back into the ocean. So far little scientific information exists about its long-term effects. In the past, most big seawater-desalination plants were built in places that did not conduct adequate environmental assessments, says Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, a think-tank based in California that published a report on desalination in 2006. But as plants are built in areas with tighter environmental restrictions, more information is becoming available.

Some recent measurements from Perth are encouraging. Initially scientists from the Centre for Water Research feared that the brine discharge from the plant would increase the saltiness of the coastal environment. But a monitoring study found that salinity returns to normal levels within about 500 metres of the plants’ discharge units. “The brine discharge is a problem that can be overcome with good design,” says Dr Antenucci.

A separate problem may be that some metals or chemicals leach into the brine. Thermal-desalination plants are prone to corrosion, and may shed traces of heavy metals, such as copper, into the waste stream. Reverse-osmosis plants, for their part, use chemicals during the pre-treatment and cleaning of the membranes, some of which may end up in the brine. Modern plants, however, remove most of the chemicals from the water before it is discharged. And new approaches to pre-treatment may reduce or eliminate the need for some chemicals.

Based on the limited evidence available to date, it appears that desalination may actually be less environmentally harmful than some other water-supply options, such as diverting large amounts of fresh water from rivers, for example, which can lead to severe reductions in local fish populations. But uncertainties over the environmental impacts of desalination make it hard to draw definite conclusions, the National Research Council concluded. Its report suggested that further research on the environmental impacts of desalination, and how to mitigate them, should be a high priority.

The reverse-osmosis process is increasingly being used not just for desalination, but to recycle wastewater, too. In Orange County, California, reclaimed water is being used to replenish groundwater, and in Singapore, it is pumped into local reservoirs, which are used as a source for drinking water. In both cases, the treated water is also available for tasting at local water-recycling facilities. This “toilet-to-tap” approach may leave some people feeling queasy, but wastewater is a valuable resource, says Sabine Lattemann, a researcher at the University of Oldenburg, Germany, who studies the environmental impacts of desalination. “Energy demand is lower compared to desalination,” she explains, “and you can produce high-quality drinking water.”

As water becomes more scarce, people will want to find several ways to secure their supplies. Many parts of the world also have enormous scope to use water more efficiently, argues Dr Gleick—and that would be cheaper than desalination. But sometimes, making desalination part of the approach to water management may be the only way to ensure a steady supply of drinking water.

In drought-ridden Western Australia, which ordered conservation years ago, the Water Corporation has adopted what it calls “security through diversity”, otherwise known in the industry as the “portfolio” approach. At the moment, Perth’s residents receive about 17% of their drinking water from seawater desalination. Desalination makes sense as one of several water sources along with conservation, agrees Dr Antenucci. But, he adds, “to say it is the silver bullet is wrong.”

-

Jun 5th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Economics Focus: Building BRICs of growth

Record spending on infrastructure will help to sustain rapid growth in emerging economies

THE biggest investment boom in history is under way. Over half of the world's infrastructure investment is now taking place in emerging economies, where sales of excavators have risen more than fivefold since 2000. In total, emerging economies are likely to spend an estimated $1.2 trillion on roads, railways, electricity, telecommunications and other projects this year, equivalent to 6% of their combined GDPs—twice the average infrastructure-investment ratio in developed economies. Largely as a result, total fixed investment in emerging economies could increase by a staggering 16% in real terms this year, according to HSBC, whereas in rich economies it is forecast to be flat. Such investment will help support economic growth this year as America's economy stalls—and for many years to come.


Compounding this year's figure, Morgan Stanley predicts that emerging economies will spend $22 trillion (in today's prices) on infrastructure over the next ten years, of which China will account for 43% (see left-hand chart). China is already spending around 12% of its GDP on infrastructure. Indeed, China has spent more (in real terms) in the past five years than in the whole of the 20th century. Last year Brazil launched a four-year plan to spend $300 billion to modernise its road network, power plants and ports. The Indian government's latest five-year plan has ambitiously pencilled in nearly $500 billion in infrastructure projects. Russia, the Gulf states and other oil exporters are all pouring part of their higher oil revenues into fixed investment.

Good infrastructure has always played a leading role in economic development, from the roads and aqueducts of ancient Rome to Britain's railway boom in the mid-19th century. But never before has infrastructure spending been so large as a share of world GDP. This is partly because more countries are now industrialising than ever before, but also because China and others are investing at a much brisker pace than rich economies ever did. Even at the peak of Britain's railway mania in the 1840s, total infrastructure investment was only around 5% of GDP.

Infrastructure investment can yield big economic gains. Building roads or railways immediately boosts output and jobs, but it also helps to spur future growth—provided the money is spent wisely. Better transport helps farmers to get their produce to cities, and manufacturers to export their goods overseas. Countries with the lowest transport costs tend to be more open to foreign trade and so enjoy faster growth. Clean water and sanitation also raise the quality of human capital, thereby lifting labour productivity. The World Bank estimates that a 1% increase in a country's infrastructure stock is associated with a 1% increase in the level of GDP. Other studies have concluded that East Asia's much higher investment in infrastructure explains a large part of its faster growth than Latin America.

A recent report by Goldman Sachs argues that infrastructure spending is not just a cause of economic growth, but a consequence of it. As people get richer and more of them live in towns, the demand for electricity, transport, sanitation and housing increases. This mutually reinforcing relationship leads to higher investment and growth. The bank has developed a model that uses expected growth in income, urbanisation and population to forecast future infrastructure demands.

Urbanisation has the biggest impact on electricity requirements. Goldman calculates that a 1% increase in the share of people living in cities leads to a 1.8% increase in demand for installed capacity. A 1% rise in income per head leads to a 0.5% increase in demand. Putting this together, electricity capacity may have to surge by 140% in China and by 80% in India over the next decade (see right-hand chart). Air travel—and hence airports—will see the fastest growth in demand, because it is by far the most sensitive to income: a 1% increase in income per person leads to a 1.4% increase in the number of passengers travelling by air. The number of air passengers could jump by more than 350% in China and by 200% in India over the next decade.

China's faster growth in income per head and its more rapid pace of urbanisation mean that it is likely to pull even further ahead of India on most infrastructure measures. China could add 13 times as many fixed-line phones as India over the decade, seven times as many air passengers and six times as much electricity capacity. Brazil and Russia, which are already much more urbanised and relatively richer (implying slower growth in income), will also see more modest growth in infrastructure.


How will emerging economies finance all this spending? The fiscal finances of most emerging economies are in good shape. As a group, they are close to having a balanced budget, although a few, notably India, have large deficits. Even so, the vast scale of investment will require more private-sector money. To attract that, emerging economies will need to offer investors a decent return and that will require reform of their regulatory systems and a move towards market pricing. In India only about half of all electricity generated is paid for, because power is stolen and bills are left unpaid. In turn, the financing needs of massive infrastructure investment could encourage the development of domestic bond markets, bringing additional long-term benefits.

The infrastructure boom has global implications. Increased investment means more imports of capital equipment, which will help to slim current-account surpluses in China and elsewhere, and so reduce global imbalances. Rising demand for building materials will keep commodity prices high.

Last, but not least, will be the negative impact on the environment. An expected 75% increase in emerging economies' electricity demand over the next decade will worsen air pollution and global warming. Many fear that China's Three Gorges Dam, the world's largest hydroelectric project, could cause massive environmental damage. China's national bird, the red-crowned crane, is an endangered species. Some people may wish that the construction crane was also breeding less rapidly

-

Jun 5th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

GeoPediaSiberian Oil



Photograph by: Gerd Ludwig, National Geographic June 2008

Under communist rule, the U.S.S.R. was a major oil producer, with western Siberia providing most of the supply. Soviet production peaked in 1988 at around 12.5 million barrels per day (bbd), two-thirds of which came from western Siberia. Just before communism collapsed in 1991, oil production began falling, bottoming out in the mid-1990s at a little over six million bbd. Not until the late 1990s did production take off again.

Today western Siberia still produces about 70 percent of Russia's oil, and the province of Khanty-Mansi lies at the heart of the boom. All of Russia is reaping the benefits, but nowhere are the effects of the bonanza more obvious than in Khanty-Mansi cities like Surgut, Nefteyugansk, and Khanty-Mansiysk, the province's capital—all of which have been transformed by new investments in housing, commerce, arts, and science, among other areas.

Current Russian oil production, about ten million bbd, hasn't reached the levels of the late 1980s, but oil prices have increased tenfold over the past decade, giving the Russian government, which seized control of a number of oil fields from various oligarchs in the mid-2000s, a steady flow of revenue. And despite its lower production rate, Russia is now the world's top producer of crude oil and the second largest exporter of total oil products (behind Saudi Arabia). But the Russian government's tactics in managing its oil fields have made foreign investors wary and could pose a problem for the future of Russia’s oil economy.

Bibliography
Considine, Jennifer I., and William A. Kerr. The Russian Oil Economy. Edward Elgar, 2002.

"Russia Energy Profile." Energy Information Administration.

Ellman, Michael, ed. Russia's Oil and Natural Gas: Bonanza or Curse? Anthem Press, 2006.

Fortescue, Stephen. Russia's Oil Barons and Metal Magnates: Oligarchs and the State in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

Grace, John D. Russian Oil Supply: Performance and Prospects. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Grace, John D., interviewed by CERA.

Lincoln, W. Bruce. The Conquest of a Continent: Siberia and the Russians. Random House, 1994.

Khanty-Mansiysk Province.

Other Resources
Banjanovic, Adisa. "Russia's New Immigration Policy Will Boost the Population." Euromonitor International, June 14, 2007.

"Petroleum Data." Energy Information Administration.

Gaidar, Yegor. Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia. Brookings Institution Press, 2007.

Grace, John D. "Russia Oil: Up or Down? State or Market?" 2006 Horn Lecture on Energy.

"Khanty-Mansi (Ob-Ugrians) and Samoyeds."

Khanty Song.

Exporting Russian Oil to the Far East

By Karen Font

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:33:02 AM

The Russian government has been negotiating with Chinese authorities to build a pipeline to move crude oil from eastern Siberia to Russia's Amur Province on the Chinese border. Part of the 1,680-mile (2,700-kilometer) pipeline—operated by Transneft, a government-owned company with one of the largest networks of oil pipelines in the world—may be open by late 2009, and when it reaches full capacity, it's expected to transport 600,000 barrels of oil a day.

Bibliography
"Russia to Begin China Oil Pipeline in 2008." AFX News Limited, July 9, 2007.

"Oil Exports." Energy Information Administration.

Golubkova, Ekaterina. "Russia Mulls Low Tariff for Oil Pipeline to China." Reuters, March 8, 2008.

Poussenkova, Nina. "The Wild, Wild East. East Siberia and the Far East: A New Petroleum Frontier?" Carnegie Moscow Center Working Paper No. 4, 2007.

Billionaires in Russia

By Karen Font

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:34:05 AM

A 2008 list of the top 1,000 billionaires in the world included 87 Russian citizens, five of whom were earning more than $20 billion annually. A fifth of the Russian billionaires were oil or gas tycoons. Some of these oligarchs have been accused of tax evasion and fraud, a few have been linked to murder, and others are rumored to have ties to the mafia. Yet other Russian billionaires have shown a philanthropic side, spending tens of millions of dollars—or more—on Russian artworks, particularly Russian icons, and donating them to the state. Some have established foundations or charities, some have contributed to city infrastructure projects. U.S. museums and other organizations have also benefited from these oligarchs' financial donations.

Bibliography
"The World's Richest People: Billionaires 2008." Forbes (March 24, 2008).

"World's Billionaires"

Finn, Peter. "A Rich Market for Russian Icons." Washington Post, February 5, 2008.

Other Resources
Link of Times Foundation.

Open Russia Foundation

Last updated: May 13, 2008


-

Karen Font

GeoPedia: World Oil

When Will the Peak Hit?



-
Christy Ullrich

Saturday, May 31, 2008

GeoPedia - The Research Behind The Stories: Snow Leopards

Snow Leopards of Central Asia


Photograph by: Steve Winter, National Geographic June 2008

The snow leopard, uncia uncia, lives a solitary life in remote areas of 12 Central Asian countries. It has a beautiful spotted coat considered desirable by trophy hunters, who may travel a long way for the chance to track and kill the rare cat. Many livestock herders who live inside the species' range consider the snow leopard a pest—not unlike a wolf, though if they manage to trap, shoot, or poison a cat that's preying on their flocks, they can sell the pelt illegally for a veritable fortune. These and other threats, such as the loss of wild prey to hunters and the loss of prime habitat to human encroachment, have shrunk the snow leopard population—estimates of the number still living in the wild run as low as 3,500. Writer Douglas Chadwick traveled around India and Mongolia trying to catch a glimpse of a snow leopard. Photographer Steve Winter also went to those countries and to Pakistan, setting up many remote camera traps that captured photos of snow leopards when they came out of the shadows.

Bibliography
Chadwick, Douglas H. "Out of the Shadows." National Geographic (June 2008), 106-129.

Other Resources
"Snow Leopard: Principal Threats." IUCN-World Conservation Union. Species Survival Commission, Cat Specialist Group.

Theile, Stephanie. Fading Footprints: The Killing and Trade of Snow Leopards. TRAFFIC International, 2003.

>>>>

Snow Leopards Captured on Film

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:43:46 AM

Nearly four decades ago George Schaller of the New York Zoological Society patiently roamed the craggy mountains of Pakistan's Chitral Valley, following tracks in the snow, searching for the legendary, beautiful, and elusive snow leopard. He spent many hours contemplating and recording the cat's behavior. His photographs of snow leopards—the first images of them in the wild—ran in an article titled "Imperiled Phantom of Asian Peaks" in National Geographic’s November 1971 issue. Schaller later published his images in a book called Stones of Silence.

Fifteen years later, wildlife conservationist Rodney Jackson set up camera traps high in the peaks of Nepal and captured thrillingly candid portraits of snow leopards for his June 1986 National Geographic cover story, written with Darla Hillard. Another first was the bite Jackson received while successfully collaring five of the cats during a four-year NG-sponsored radio-tracking study. His bandaged hand can be seen in a photograph in the article.

Bibliography
Chadwick, Douglas H. "Out of the Shadows." National Geographic (June 2008), 106-129.

Other Resources
Schaller, George B. "Imperiled Phantom of Asian Peaks." National Geographic (November 1971), 702-707.

Jackson, Rodney, and Darla Hillard. "Tracking the Elusive Snow Leopard." National Geographic (June 1986), 793-812.

>>>>

Snow Leopards Thrive in Zoos Around the World

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:45:20 AM

Work is being done in communities within the snow leopard's natural range to offset the many threats to the decreasing wild population. Groups such as the Snow Leopard Conservancy and the Snow Leopard Trust have started education and insurance programs designed to help local people value this wild animal. Outside of the cat's natural range, these and other organizations work to conserve the global population through captive-breeding programs.

In 1903 the New York Zoological Society's Bronx Zoo became the first zoo in the Western Hemisphere to exhibit a snow leopard. The breeding program developed there has produced about 80 cubs, many of which have been sent to other zoos in North America and in several other countries.

The newest wild-born snow leopard at the Bronx Zoo—now operated by the Wildlife Conservation Society—was found orphaned in the Naltar Valley of Pakistan in July 2005. In a major diplomatic operation, the State Department, working with several wildlife conservation organizations, helped relocate the cub to the U.S. Since making his debut in the Himalayan Highlands section of the Bronx Zoo on September 25, 2007, the cub, named Leo, has led an active life, playing on a rocky hillside and supplementing his diet by hunting small animals that wander into the exhibition space.

When Leo is old enough to breed—three to four years old—his genes
will help strengthen the already genetically robust North American captive-breeding program. He will live in New York until he returns to his home valley in Pakistan, where another captive-breeding facility is to be built. In the meantime, Patrick Thomas, Bronx Zoo curator of mammals, says, "Leo is a perfect example of being an ambassador for his wild counterparts."

Bibliography
Elder, Scott. "Snow Leopard Rescue." NG Kids (December 2007/January 2008), 27-29.

Martin, Cecelia. "Bronx Zoo Provides New Home for Pakistani Snow Leopard." Washington File, August 8, 2006.

Search for "education" and "empowering villagers." Snow Leopard Conservancy.

Search for "community-based conservation" and "snow leopard conservation timeline." Snow Leopard Trust.

"Snow Leopard Orphan Gets a Fresh Start at the Bronx Zoo." Wildlife Conservation Society, August 10, 2007.

"Brief History of the Bronx Zoo." Wildlife Conservation Society.

>>>>

Snow Leopard Trust Founder Helen Freeman

By Nancie Majkowski

ver. 2 - Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:46:00 AM

Breeding management is an important part of building a captive snow leopard population. The Woodland Park Zoo in Seattle, Washington, which has had snow leopards since 1972, was among the first zoos in the United States to set up a breeding program.

Helen Freeman, the zoo's education curator, played a vital role in building the captive population. In 1981 she founded the International Snow Leopard Trust; she also helped establish the Snow Leopard Species Survival Plan (SSP) for the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA).

Freeman was the first snow leopard studbook keeper for the AZA's cooperative breeding program, which manages the entire North American snow leopard gene pool. A genetically diverse population is essential to the species' long-term survival. At Woodland Park, Freeman created a self-sustaining population—the zoo no longer needs to bring in snow leopards from the wild.

Since her death in 2007, Freeman has been remembered for working tirelessly to establish community-based programs in Central Asian countries that benefit snow leopard populations and local people. This Snow Leopard Trust anniversary video shows Freeman discussing her vision.

Bibliography
"Species Survival Plan Program." Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Marren, Peter. "Helen Freeman: Conservationist Who Worked to Save the Snow Leopard." Independent, October 6, 2007.


Other Resources
Jackson, Rodney M., and others. Surveying Snow Leopard Populations With Emphasis on Camera Trapping: A Handbook. Snow Leopard Conservancy, 2005.

McCarthy, Thomas M., and Guillame Chapron, eds. Snow Leopard Survival Strategy. International Snow Leopard Trust and Snow Leopard Network, 2003.

Schaller, George B. Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. University of Chicago, 1998.

Sunquist, Fiona, and Mel Sunquist. Wild Cats of the World. University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Last updated: April 17, 2008


How To Help - Save The Cats

Covering traditional stone corrals with chain-link fencing protects Himalayan herders' livestock from snow leopards. It also protects snow leopards from the herders themselves. Minimizing livestock losses cuts down on revenge killings of the big cats. Says Darla Hillard of the Snow Leopard Conservancy, which helps fund the predator-proofing, "Our basic approach is to turn the snow leopard from being seen as a pest into a valued asset, worth more alive than dead." The following groups work with Central Asian communities to help both the people who live there and the cats.

Snow Leopard Conservancy forms partnerships with in-country groups to foster stewardship of snow leopards and their habitat. Efforts include camera traps and tracking with GPS units as well as programs to benefit local people, such as himalayan-homestays.com. For more information, go to snowleopardconservancy.org.

Snow Leopard Trust offers an array of conservation programs in five different countries: livestock vaccinations in Pakistan, livestock insurance in India, ecotourism in Kyrgyzstan, and more. Crafts made by Mongolian herder families can be purchased from the trust's Snow Leopard Enterprises at snowleopard.org/shop.

Out of the Shadows - The elusive Central Asian snow leopard steps into a risk-filled future

Snow Leopards

Snow Leopard walking

When a snow leopard stalks prey among the mountain walls, it moves on broad paws with extra fur between the toes, softly, slowly, "like snow slipping off a ledge as it melts," Raghu says.

"You almost have to turn away for a minute to tell the animal is going anywhere. If it knocks a stone loose, it will reach out a foot to stop it from falling and making noise." One might be moving right now, perfectly silent and perfectly tensed, maybe close by. But where? That's always the question. That, and how many are left to see?

Raghunandan Singh Chundawat has watched snow leopards as often as anyone alive. The New Delhi biologist studied them closely for five years in Hemis High Altitude National Park in Ladakh, the largest, loftiest district of northern India, and carried out wildlife surveys in the region over nine additional years. We're in the 1,300-square-mile park this evening, setting up camp in a deeply cleft canyon near 12,000 feet. It's June, and the blue sheep have new lambs.

We keep one eye on a group crossing a scree slope, the other eye on the cliffs at its top. Leopards are ambush hunters that like to attack from above. While the common leopard of Asia and Africa relies on branches and leaves for concealment, the snow leopard loses itself among steep jumbles of stone. This is exactly the kind of setting one would favor. But I'm not holding my breath. Raghu has sighted only a few dozen in his whole career.

Lengthening shadows coalesce into dusk. Wild roses perfume the Himalayan canyon as passing squalls brush the ridgetops with new snow. I imagine a leopard easing down the darkened slopes. It flows low to the ground, with huge gold eyes and a coat the color of dappled moonlight on frost. The body stretches four feet from nose to rump. Its tail, the most striking in the feline family, is almost as long, and so thick and mobile it looks as if the cat is being followed by a fuzzy python. The snow leopard sometimes uses its tail to send signals during social encounters or to wrap partway around itself like a scarf when bedded down in bitter weather. But the main function of this plume is to add balance in an environment with thousand-foot drops.

In Mongolia a park ranger once told me he'd seen snow leopards crouch and sway that plume in the air to lure curious marmots closer, just as hunters do with white rags. Possible. But I heard a simpler explanation from Sodnomdeleg Bazarhuyag, a retired doctor in a community of herders in northwestern Mongolia. We went to search out snow leopard sign in a gorge glistening with river ice. When a band of scimitarhorned wild goats (ibex) appeared on the skyline, Bazarhuyag scanned carefully around them, saying, "Snow leopards are good at hiding, but sometimes they forget about their tail."



-
By Douglas H. Chadwick
Photograph by Steve Winter

Send Me to Siberia - Oil transforms a Russian outpost

Frozen Assets

Siberian Oil Boom

It's around midnight, and the couples on the dance floor at the Palace Restaurant are gently swaying to a slow one. "Za nas, za neft—To us, to oil," the singer croons,

Wherever life sends us,
To us, to oil …
We fill our glasses to the brim.

It is Oilers' Day in the western Siberian province of Khanty-Mansi. This annual holiday, honoring the hard labor of the oil workers, the neftyaniki, falls early in September, after the worst of the summer mosquito season and before the first snowfall, in October. Hours earlier, as daylight faded, thousands crowded into a huge outdoor sports complex. A stage was framed by a deep-green backdrop of unbroken forest. Balloons were released, torches were lit, and a troupe belted out a song:

There is only one joy for us,
And this is all we need,
To wash our faces in the new oil,
Of the drilling rig.

Little wonder Russians are toasting oil: These are boom times. Global oil prices have increased tenfold since 1998, and Russia has pulled ahead of Saudi Arabia as the world's top crude oil producer. The Kremlin's budget now overflows with funds for new schools, roads, and national defense projects, and Moscow's nouveau riche are plunking down millions of dollars for mansion-scale "dachas."

The pumping heart of the boom is western Siberia's boggy oil fields, which produce around 70 percent of Russia's oil—some seven million barrels a day. For Khanty-Mansi, a territory nearly the size of France, the bonanza provides an unparalleled opportunity to create modern, even desirable living conditions in a region whose very name evokes a harsh, desolate place. Khanty-Mansi's regional capital, scene of the holiday revelries, is being rebuilt with oil-tax proceeds. The new structures include an airport terminal (once a wooden shack with an outhouse), an art museum featuring paintings by 19th-century Russian masters, and a pair of lavishly equipped boarding schools for children gifted in mathematics and the arts. Even the provincial town of Surgut, a backwater only a few decades ago, is laying out new suburbs and is plagued by traffic jams.

But the opportunity presented by oil could slip through the region's fingers. Despite the remarkable surge in oil prices, oil production in western Siberia has leveled off in recent years. Output barely rose from 2004 to 2007—a period when the rulers of the Kremlin, a cold-eyed and control-oriented crew, seized choice fields once held by private oil barons. The oligarchs, as they were known, were rapacious sorts who jousted among themselves for spoils. But they also heavily invested in the fields in order to maximize production and profits. The Kremlin, by contrast, aims to exploit oil not only as a source of national wealth, but also as a political tool for making Russia a great world power once again. Its heavy-handed tactics have made foreign investors wary and could undermine the boom—and with it Khanty-Mansi's chances for a brighter future.

WESTERN SIBERIA'S great oil deposits lie under lands that an exiled Marxist revolutionary, suffering in the gulag, once called the "waste places of the Earth." But to someone visiting by choice, oil country looks fetchingly wild and pristine. The terrain is dominated by taiga—dense forest of spindly birch, cedar, and pine—and boloto, peaty marsh that is frozen for most of the year and in spots bubbles with methane. There are no mountains and few hills, but there are numerous lakes, rivers, and streams.

Oil exploration began in earnest here in the mid-1960s. When geologists reported that large reserves of oil were waiting to be tapped, the Kremlin organized a frenzied military-style invasion of "pioneers" and bulldozers to ramp up production. Western Siberia, it turned out, had even more black gold than anyone had dreamed: More than 70 billion barrels have been pumped over the past 40 years.

In the early days "Siberia was all frontier," says Khanty-Mansi's governor, Alexander Filipenko. The governor appears older than his 58 years, with a shock of gray hair, watery eyes, and a mottled nose that has weathered its share of frost. Filipenko arrived in Khanty-Mansi in the early 1970s with orders to lay a bridge over the Ob River, which in the late 19th century was a route for squalid barges transporting prisoners to their final places of banishment. The bridge project took four years of toil under brutal conditions. Yet despite the hardships, the governor looks back at that time the way an old man might recall his first love for a beautiful young woman.

Filipenko is equally passionate about his latest project—the redevelopment of the provincial capital, Khanty-Mansiysk, a town of 60,000. He attends to every detail, and he has the funds to remake the capital to his liking. The province's oil industry generates 40 billion dollars in annual tax revenues, 4.5 billion dollars of which Khanty-Mansi gets to keep for its own use. The rest goes to Moscow.

His party background notwithstanding, Filipenko's vision is a distinctly non-Soviet one. The capital's leading architectural symbols include a shopping emporium topped by an enormous green dome in the shape of a chum, the traditional tent used by the region's indigenous people—the Khanty, Mansi, and others who herd reindeer, hunt, and fish. That symbolism would have been unthinkable in Soviet times, when the state, with its ideological cult of "the worker," denied the very idea of culturally derived identity.

When Siberia's oil lands came under development, native people were forcibly herded into villages and cut off from their hunting and fishing grounds. Following the breakup of the Soviet Union, the nomads won legal status as "aboriginal people," with the right to roam the oil fields. In spite of their new status and the architectural homage in the capital, their lot has hardly improved. Their numbers are small, about 30,000 in all; their languages are nearly extinct; and they are heavily afflicted by the scourges of contemporary Russia—AIDS, alcoholism, and tuberculosis. Some oil-tax money is being invested in medical ships that stop along the rivers to care for patients. But critics say these floating clinics diagnose disease, then leave patients with no means to get treatment.

Rural Russia is also being depopulated by the flight of young people to Moscow and other cities. To counter these trends, Filipenko has implemented ambitious plans to turn Khanty-Mansi into a place young people will choose to live in rather than leave. And this effort, he boasts, is working. He notes that Khanty-Mansi has the third highest birthrate among provinces in Russia, and unlike the country as a whole, whose population is in decline, Khanty-Mansi's has increased 18 percent since 1989, from a combination of births and immigration.

Oil composes 90 percent of the capital's economy, which is not surprising given the surge in oil prices. But it points to a problem shared by all resource-dependent economies: At some point the resource will be exhausted, and new sources of prosperity will have to be found. Recognizing the need to develop economic prospects beyond oil, Filipenko persuaded some 80 top researchers from Akademgorodok—a famed science and research town in southern Siberia created in Soviet times—to move to his regional capital to staff a new institute specializing in information technologies. The institute provides consulting services to oil companies, but it also takes on projects in unrelated fields such as nanotechnology.

It's the start of a "Silicon Taiga," says Alexander Sherbakov, a 60-year-old mathematician with a gray walrus mustache. As the era of easy oil comes to an end, he says, "we're going to grow our own scholars" by creating information-age jobs for the younger generation. Unlike investment in oil, investment in science, he says, can guarantee an everlasting bright future for the region's economy and its people.

That's undoubtedly an optimistic assessment. For one thing, the touted model, Silicon Valley, is located in temperate California. In Soviet times the Kremlin could simply order top scientists to move to remote research centers. In post-Soviet times Russia's top researchers can live and work wherever they choose, and most are choosing to live in prosperous cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg.

WHILE THE OIL BOOM has yet to make Siberia a magnet for Russia's knowledge class, it is attracting many other newcomers: impoverished immigrants from beyond Russia's borders. Early one morning, in a vacant lot just off the highway to Filipenko's showcase capital, a group of about 15 shabbily dressed men ranging in age from their 20s to their 40s are waiting for offers of work, however menial. A white Nissan pulls up, and several of the men walk over to talk to the driver, who is looking for a few hands to dig potatoes. But his offering price, just under ten dollars a day, isn't enough, and he drives away without any takers.

These men are what Russians, borrowing a German word, call gastarbeiters—guest workers. They are nearly everywhere in Khanty-Mansi. Most are Muslims from Tajikistan, the former Soviet republic in Central Asia whose economy was shattered by civil war in the mid-1990s. They come here in spring and return home before winter arrives. It's not every day they find a job, but when they do they can earn about $20 lugging bags of cement for a construction crew or doing household cleaning. They wire funds back to their families, and their employers avoid paying taxes on the wages.

The men balk at my request to see their living quarters. One says he is ashamed to show me how he lives. "I don't want you to get the wrong idea," he says. "We are not bandits; we are civilized people. We just need work."

The men are supposed to obtain registration papers certifying their place of residence, but, as they tell me, they have no authorized place to live, bunking instead in unheated garages illegally rented to them. A work boss—a kind of Mafia figure—obtains papers for them by bribing the registration office, but those documents, listing a false address, leave the gastarbeiters at the mercy of the police. When they are found out, they're sometimes forced to pay a spot "fine" (read "bribe"), and repeat offenders may face deportation. Russia's federal government recently put the burden on employers to register the workers and check their identifications, but such measures are unlikely to stem the tide so long as the oil boom continues.

A FLOOD OF RUSSIANS from economically depressed cities west of the Urals is also swelling the oil towns of western Siberia. Forty years ago Surgut was a collection of wooden hovels, in a place where temperatures can plunge to minus 60 degrees Fahrenheit and midwinter darkness lasts for all but a few hours a day. Today Surgut is one of western Siberia's largest cities, with 300,000 people. The new arrivals are voting with their feet, a sign that Russia's new market economy is actually working.

The polish and prosperity on view in Surgut were once unthinkable in Russia's hinterlands. A combined day care and preschool the city recently remodeled with 5.2 million dollars largely from oil revenue now has a heated indoor swimming pool and hydromassage whirlpool; an animal collection with rabbits, turtles, and parrots; and a room with a small wooden stage on which colorfully costumed children diligently perform fairy tales. When weather doesn't permit outdoor exercise, the children can ride around in toy cars in a large, glass-enclosed playroom kept at a moderately chilled temperature. And then the toddlers can be soothed by a hot drink from the herbal tea bar.

I understand that the "foreigner" is being shown the finest kindergarten in town, but only so much can be faked. Stuck in Surgut's traffic jams are as many Hondas, Toyotas, and Nissans as inexpensive Russian-made Ladas. Two-car families are becoming more common with the rise in living standard.

The housing stock of a typical Russian city consists of large (and ugly) multistoried concrete apartment blocks. Surgut boasts a suburban development of single-family town houses, aimed at a new upper middle class of oil company managers, bankers, and entrepreneurs. The redbrick houses, each with its own small plot of land, are being built along a tree-lined stretch of riverfront at an average cost of $400,000. Envious townspeople coined an ironic sobriquet for the elite community: Dolina Nischikh, Valley of the Beggars.

Surgut might have fallen apart, as did some other Russian cities, in the chaos following the collapse of the Soviet Union. That it didn't is a testament to the rootedness and stability of its political and business leadership.

"I was born in Surgut, my children were born here, and my grandchildren were born here," Alexander Sidorov, the city's longtime mayor, proudly declares. Surgut's economic anchor, the oil company Surgutneftegas, Russia's fourth largest producer, is majority owned by local managers. And unlike most Russian oil barons, who rule their western Siberian empires from Moscow, Surgutneftegas's general director, billionaire Vladimir Bogdanov, makes his home in town. Though now a towering figure in Surgut, Bogdanov started out as a common neftyanik.

Surgutneftegas is using the oil boom to finance an ambitious modernization program. At the oil field management center, computer engineers have custom designed an enormous digital map to monitor and adjust the field's performance. The map displays real-time information sent by coded radio signal from pump stations, active wells, and pipelines. From this display, managers can tell how much electric power is being consumed, whether a well needs repairs, and whether a pipeline is leaking.

Protection of the environment, barely a concern in Soviet times, is becoming part of the new ethos. It's not that the oil industry has suddenly become softhearted toward flora and fauna. Rather, high oil prices provide an incentive to minimize waste, as do license agreements that include big fines for spills. Moreover, as Russian oil firms have become global players, they've also become more sensitive to international concerns about the environment. "Maintaining a good reputation is very important," says Alexey Knizhnikov of the World Wildlife Fund in Moscow. "Otherwise, doing business becomes difficult."

Lubov Malyshkina, director of the environmental department at Surgutneftegas, is a chemical engineer with an advanced degree in the science of corrosion protection and geoecology. She also serves as an elected official in the regional parliament. In Soviet times, she says, the oil ministry in Moscow, oblivious to local conditions, would send chemicals that proved useless to treat oil spills and other hazards. Now Malyshkina's department, drawing on a nearly 500-million-dollar budget, makes its own purchases. She shows me one: a Swedish-made Truxor vehicle with tanklike treads that break up oil-saturated peat so that spills can be cleaned up. The company is also investing five million dollars in a new plant for recycling old tires into fibers that can be mixed into the asphalt used to pave company roads.

One aspect of the oil industry here hasn't changed: The neftyanik's job is still hazardous and grueling. At a rig about an hour's drive from Surgut, villagers gathering mushrooms are dwarfed by massive pumps, whose rhythmic motion suggests a giant bird dipping its beak to the soil. Metal stairs slick with oil lead to a platform where a drill is boring through rock with a diamond-coated bit nearly a foot in diameter. It's noisy and the air is foul, but this is a good spot to be in winter, I'm told, because the platform is bathed in steam. The men work eight-hour shifts for up to 30 straight days, sleeping on-site in trailer wagons, then rest off-site for up to 30 days. Alcohol is strictly forbidden. Drink all you want during your rest, the men are told, but return sober.

Yet the jobs are a route to a prosperity unimaginable a few years ago. The least experienced workers get a monthly salary of $1,000, the most senior hands as much as $4,000. And there are bonuses for exceeding daily quotas. A thrifty neftyanik can save enough to purchase a flat in Surgut's apartment complexes—if not a town house in the Valley of the Beggars.

All of this is impressive, of course. But the larger question for Surgutneftegas, and every oil firm in Khanty-Mansi, is whether they can rise to the myriad political, economic, and technical challenges on the horizon. While most analysts expect western Siberia to remain the dominant source of Russia's oil for at least the next 20 years, the region's oil fields are aging. Coaxing additional barrels of oil from the ground is becoming more difficult and expensive, and maintaining production will require infusions of capital and expertise from sources outside Russia. But burdensome taxes—all gross revenues above $25 a barrel go to the federal government—and Kremlin-backed power plays have chilled the investment climate like a Siberian blizzard. One need only visit Nefteyugansk, a city of 114,000 on the Ob River about an hour's drive from Surgut, to see why.

A BLACK GUSHER of trouble is what the oil boom has been for Nefteyugansk, which has the look and feel of an unkempt industrial park. The central plaza is strewn with iron pipes, and down by the river a crumpled barrel of Shell oil floats next to a dilapidated dock. A few paces inside the gate of the town's cemetery lies the grave of Vladimir Petukhov, the burial ground's most famous resident. In 1996 the townspeople elected Petukhov as their mayor. Two years later, as he walked to work on a June morning, he was shot to death by a pair of gunmen. An etching on his black marble gravestone depicts him in a crewneck sweater and leather jacket.

For more than ten years oil has been at the center of a violent and chaotic power struggle in Nefteyugansk. The difficulties began in the mid-1990s, when a nouveau riche Moscow banker snagged one of Russia's prime oil producers—and the town's sole large employer—in a privatization auction. The banker, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, made the Nefteyugansk unit the core subsidiary in his new oil company, known as Yukos. But he antagonized the city by delaying tax payments, causing city workers to go unpaid for months. Mayor Petukhov, a former neftyanik, led public protests against the new Moscow owners, who, he said, "spit into our faces, the faces of oilers." The mayor's murder, at the age of 48, outraged the townspeople, many of whom connected the deed to his stand against Yukos. "This blood is on your hands," read anti-Yukos banners put up at city hall by Petukhov's mourners.

For five years no one was brought to justice. During this time the city was governed by a corrupt official who eventually was sent to jail for swindling oil workers out of their promised retirement homes in Russia's balmy Black Sea region. Oil prices, meanwhile, went ever higher, inflating the value of Khodorkovsky's holdings. And then the hammer came down.

In June 2003, Moscow prosecutors arrested Yukos's security chief on charges of organizing the execution of Petukhov. Four months later they arrested Khodorkovsky on charges of fraud and tax evasion. Tax authorities seized the Nefteyugansk subsidiary and handed it over to a Kremlin-controlled company called Rosneft. Khodorkovsky was convicted and carted off to jail in southeastern Siberia, where his face was slashed by an inmate. Meanwhile, the security chief was convicted in a trial heavily publicized on state television. In the latest development, prosecutors announced last February that Yukos co-owner Leonid Nevzlin also would be charged in Petukhov's murder.

Perhaps it did happen the way the government claimed, but ask folks in Nefteyugansk about the murder, and they tend to shrug and say they don't know what to believe. The coordinated elements of the Yukos affair have the whiff of a Moscow plot hatched by the KGB types in control of the Kremlin. The result, in any case, is that a cash cow—and still the town's livelihood—has passed from the hands of a Moscow oligarch into the hands of the Kremlin.

When I show up in town, Sergey Burov has been mayor for four months. He was once a deputy director for Rosneft and before that a senior manager for Yukos. He, too, is no stranger to violence: In 2005, while walking to his car in the morning, he took a bullet to the stomach. It looked like another contract job, but prosecutors closed the case without finding a culprit.

Burov is a burly man whose wide shoulders stretch his suit. He is interested in talking about the town's future, not its bloody past. In partnership with Rosneft, he tells me, the city administration has ambitious plans to redevelop Nefteyugansk. Come back in two years, he says, and I will see an entirely different town, maybe even a yacht club. After the interview his press secretary shows off an indoor sports facility with an Olympic-size swimming pool. In the central plaza, the one littered with pipe just a few days earlier, workers are starting to install brick walkways and flower beds.

Are things finally looking up for Nefteyugansk? Residents seem skeptical. "Maybe Rosneft feels better being here," Vasily Voroshilov, a 52-year-old oil well repairman, says. "But we don't feel it."

That skepticism is shared by many observers outside Russia, who say it's one thing to seize control of an oil company and quite another to run it. Says one analyst of the Kremlin's takeover of Russian oil, "You can steal a Chevy, but that doesn't mean you know how to drive it."

FOR ALL THE WEALTH that oil can produce, it is often as much a curse as a blessing for countries such as Russia. Early in the 1990s, before the oil boom, Boris Yeltsin encouraged local provinces to grab what autonomy they could. This was when Russia's potential for political pluralism and Western-style grassroots democracy looked greatest. When oil prices rose toward the end of the decade, the Kremlin realized that this source of wealth could be used to bring about a humiliated Russia's global resurgence. Salvation by oil has since become an article of national faith.

"Oil," said a 16-year-old student at Khanty-Mansiysk's school for math whizzes, "is the only way for our country to stand up, to survive." Actually, there are many ways that the Russians, a creative and educated people, can revive their country. But oil suggests national potency, and Russia's petroleum patrimony lends itself to patriotic incantations of an almost mystical kind. At the festivities on Oilers' Day one of the songs, a salute to the collective might of the neftyaniki, proclaimed, "We are the fingers pressed tightly into a fist."

"Russia's superpower status today comes from energy, not its military," says Julia Nanay, a senior director at PFC Energy, a global consultancy based in Washington, D.C. "The Kremlin determines what happens with oil in western Siberia. They want to control production and exports in order to maximize Russia's geopolitical relevance."

Just as the tsars of old exercised monopolies on valuable commodities such as fur and salt, the Kremlin wants direct control over oil—and over the oligarchs who produce it. Those who come to heel survive; those who don't risk suffering Khodorkovsky's fate, or worse.

One of the survivors is Vagit Alekperov, president of Russia's biggest private oil company, Lukoil. Starting out working on the rigs near his native Baku, Alekperov was sent to Siberia in the late 1970s to manage an oil-production team. A notoriously strict paternalist, he angered his men by banning the sale of alcohol in the village. Several of them grabbed hunting rifles and fired shots at his cabin, but Alekperov, ever the survivor, wasn't there at the time.

During the final days of the Soviet Union, Alekperov forged Lukoil from prime oil assets in western Siberia. Today the company is a global multinational with hydrocarbon reserves second only to ExxonMobil—and some 2,000 gas stations in the U.S. Though most of Lukoil's reserves are in western Siberia, Alekperov keeps his headquarters just two miles from the Kremlin. Like other survivors, he knows that he must be attentive to any change in political mood that could affect Lukoil's fortunes, for better or worse.

A distinguished-looking man with bronze skin and a crop of steel gray hair, Alekperov dresses in impeccably tailored suits. A tough guy, he can also charm. When pressed on whether oil consumers around the world should feel comfortable now that Russia has a large finger on the globe's petroleum tap, he leaned back in his chair, smiled expansively, and asked, "Do I look like a bear?" I couldn't help laughing. "We just want to make money."

Having gobbled up Yukos, might the Kremlin want to swallow Lukoil next? "I don't think either the government or the president of Russia will target such a company," Alekperov remonstrates. I decide not to mention that Khodorkovsky had told me the same thing not long before his arrest.

Lukoil's base of operations in Khanty-Mansi is the town of Kogalym. A roadside floral arrangement spells out the company's name not far from the golden domes of a Russian Orthodox cathedral and the green minaret of a mosque. At a refurbished maternity house—what Russians call a roddom—Dr. Galina Pustovit, director of the gynecology department, shows off new Western-standard medical equipment. In a country where many women deliver their babies in Soviet-era buildings reeking of sour cabbage and damp concrete, this gleaming facility rates four stars.

When I mention to Pustovit that Russia's oil industry is known for being corrupt, the doctor gives me a sharp look. "This is oil," she says, sweeping a hand around the gynecology ward. "Oilers built this hospital. All of the objects in this city have been built with oil money, including our beautiful boulevard." Don't judge us too harshly, her look says: Life in these parts has never been better.


-
By Paul Starobin
Photograph by Gerd Ludwig

World Oil - World oil demand is surging as supplies approach their limits.

Tapped Out

World Oil

In 2000 a Saudi oil geologist named Sadad I. Al Husseini made a startling discovery. Husseini, then head of exploration and production for the state-owned oil company, Saudi Aramco, had long been skeptical of the oil industry's upbeat forecasts for future production. Since the mid-1990s he had been studying data from the 250 or so major oil fields that produce most of the world's oil. He looked at how much crude remained in each one and how rapidly it was being depleted, then added all the new fields that oil companies hoped to bring on line in coming decades. When he tallied the numbers, Husseini says he realized that many oil experts "were either misreading the global reserves and oil-production data or obfuscating it."

Where mainstream forecasts showed output rising steadily each year in a great upward curve that kept up with global demand, Husseini's calculations showed output leveling off, starting as early as 2004. Just as alarming, this production plateau would last 15 years at best, after which the output of conventional oil would begin "a gradual but irreversible decline."

That is hardly the kind of scenario we've come to expect from Saudi Aramco, which sits atop the world's largest proven oil reserves—some 260 billion barrels, or roughly a fifth of the world's known crude—and routinely claims that oil will remain plentiful for many more decades. Indeed, according to an industry source, Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi took a dim view of Husseini's report, and in 2004 Husseini retired from Aramco to become an industry consultant. But if he is right, a dramatic shift lies just ahead for a world whose critical systems, from defense to transportation to food production, all run on cheap, abundant oil.



-
By Paul Roberts
Photograph by Randy Olson

If the Stones Could Speak - Searching for the Meaning of Stonehenge

Stonehenge

Stonehenge at night

The first glimpse often comes from the road. Blurring past on the A303 thoroughfare that cuts heedlessly almost across the monument's very entrance, Stonehenge appears as a cluster of insignificant protrusions on the big, otherwise featureless plain; and yet, even from this profane and glancing vantage, the great-shouldered silhouette is so unmistakably prehistoric that the effect is momentarily of a time warp cracking onto a lost world.

Up close, amid the confusion of broken and standing stones, it still seems smaller than its reputation, notwithstanding the obvious feat represented by the erection of the famous sarsen stones; the largest weighs as much as 50 tons. Unique today, Stonehenge was probably also unique in its own time, some 4,500 years ago—a stone monument modeled on timber precedents. Indeed, its massive lintels are bound to their uprights by mortise-and-tenon joints taken straight from carpentry, an eloquent indication of just how radically new this hybrid monument must have been. It is this newness, this assured awareness that nothing like it had existed before, this revelatory quality, that is still palpable in its ruined stones. The people who built Stonehenge had discovered something hitherto unknown, hit upon some truth, turned a corner—there is no doubt that the purposefully placed stones are fraught with meaning.

But what in fact do they mean? Despite countless theories offered over centuries, no one knows. Stonehenge is the most famous relic of prehistory in Europe and one of the best known, most contemplated monuments in the world—and we have no clear idea what the people who built it actually used it for.

In the past, archaeologists sought to crack this enigma by wringing every fact they could from the stones themselves, subjecting their contours, marks, and even shadows to scrutiny. Recently, though, the search has led investigators farther afield, away from Stonehenge itself to the remains of a nearby Neolithic village on the one hand, and on the other to a craggy mountain peak in southwestern Wales. While no definitive answer has yet emerged, these two very different searches-in-progress have stirred tantalizing new possibilities.

STONEHENGE AROSE from a rich tradition of equally enigmatic structures. Henges—circular banks of earth paralleled by an internal ditch—earth barrows and mounds, circular timber structures, monoliths, and circles and horseshoes of stone were all common throughout Neolithic Britain and parts of continental Europe. (Strictly speaking, Stonehenge is not, as its name implies, a henge, because the position of its bank and ditch are reversed.) At different stages of its evolution Stonehenge reflected many of these traditions. The first certain structural stones of Stonehenge, the bluestones, which were floated, dragged, and hauled from Wales, most likely arrived sometime before 2500 B.C. The giant sarsens followed, filling out the monument, which was at some point linked by an avenue to the River Avon. Stonehenge, then, is the culmination of a dynamic evolution; the pre-stone earthworks thrown up in grassland probably embodied different beliefs than the later monument of stone that was resolutely connected to water.




-
By Caroline Alexander
National Geographic Contributing Writer

Photograph by Ken Geiger
National Geographic Staff

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

International: Peacekeeping and sex abuse - Who will watch the watchmen?

The harm that is done by people sent to do good

ORGANISATIONS that send peacekeepers and aid workers to dangerous places are usually concerned about their envoys' physical safety. But an uglier concern has recently surfaced: how to ensure the moral integrity of people who are supposed to be helping others.

A report this week by the British branch of Save the Children, an aid organisation, underlines the problem. In a study carried out last year in three places with a strong international presence—southern Sudan, Haiti and Côte d'Ivoire—the charity said it had found widespread sexual abuse of children, some as young as six, by aid workers and, above all, by UN peacekeepers. More than half the 250 boys and girls aged 10-17 it interviewed said they knew of such cases. But the abuse remained “widely underreported”, it said, because most children were too frightened to come forward.

Sadly, the report tells a familiar tale. The UN in particular has been plagued by sex scandals among its peacekeepers in recent years. After a particularly shocking series of rapes by Nepalese blue-helmets in Congo in 2003, Kofi Annan, then UN secretary-general, set up a committee of inquiry. Its damning findings of “repeated patterns” of rape and other sexual abuse by peacekeepers prompted Mr Annan to announce three years ago a policy of “zero tolerance” for such crimes for all the 200,000 or so personnel, civilian and military, who are employed by the UN and its agencies around the world.

The world body has always banned its staff in the field from having sex with prostitutes or anyone under the age of 18. It also “strongly discourages” sexual relations even with consenting adults in the host population. “Conduct and discipline” teams have now been set up in each of the UN's 17 peacekeeping missions, along with an overarching special unit at its headquarters in New York, to help eradicate the scourge. In addition, since 2005 all new peacekeepers have been required to undergo training to prevent sexual exploitation before being sent to the field.

But the abuse continues, seemingly unabated. Following the scandal in Congo, there have been serious incidents of alleged rape of civilians by blue-helmets every single year—in Burundi (2004), Sudan (2005), Haiti (2006), Liberia (2006) and Côte d'Ivoire (2007). Last year the UN received 748 allegations of misconduct by its peacekeepers, 127 of which involved sexual exploitation and abuse. Most, if not all, will be investigated. But few are likely to lead to convictions or sanctions.

For when it comes to its blue-helmets, the UN finds itself in a bind. Although it can, and does, investigate any serious complaints against them, it has no jurisdiction over the alleged culprits. Only their home states have the authority to try and punish them. Most peacekeeping troops come from the developing world—Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, Jordan, Nigeria, Nepal and Ghana are the biggest contributors—and many prefer to sweep such incidents under the carpet. All the UN can do is to dismiss them and recommend their repatriation. As all peacekeeping troops enjoy absolute legal immunity, the host country cannot do anything either.

Civilian police attached to such missions are a different matter. Like other non-local UN civilian staff in the field, they enjoy only qualified immunity—for actions committed in the course of their official functions. Rape and the abuse of minors would not fall into that category, of course. So such crimes could, in theory, be prosecuted locally. In practice, however, this is unlikely, as the kind of countries to which blue-helmets are sent have either appalling justice systems, or non-existent ones. Besides, finding witnesses willing to speak and assembling sufficient evidence are often virtually impossible in such chaos.

Aid agencies and other NGOs are subject to different laws again. Their foreign-based workers have no immunity in the host country. If they come from civil-law countries, like France, they may be prosecuted—though with great difficulty—back home. Citizens of common-law states, like Britain and most old Commonwealth states, cannot usually be prosecuted at home for crimes committed abroad, but they can be for sex offences.

Most NGOs have codes of conduct, under which the purchase of sexual favours, let alone actual abuse, is strictly banned. But the toughest penalty they can impose is dismissal. Save the Children UK recently sacked three workers for having sex with girls of 17, which, though not illegal, breached its code.

The charity now wants an international watchdog to tackle abuse. How it can succeed where the UN has failed is unclear. One of the biggest problems is not just the unwillingness of victims to complain, but their ignorance of their basic rights. What is needed, suggests Françoise Hampson, a professor of international law, is a campaign to inform the locals of their rights, along with an easily accessible complaints procedure. But in a huge, chaotic place like Congo, that's a tall order.

Another way to improve the present system, she says, would be to require heads of mission to investigate any allegations of wrongdoing at the first whisper, rather than waiting for a formal complaint. She also proposes that the agreements drawn up between the UN and troop-contributing nations be modified to oblige the state at least to tell the UN what it has done to punish wrongdoers.

The UN has been trying to strengthen its procedures. Under a revised “model memorandum of understanding” adopted last year, governments are now explicitly required “to bring the full force of their legal sanctions to bear” to enforce the UN's standards of conduct. What that will mean in practice has yet to be seen. But at least investigation procedures have improved. Upon notification of a case of serious misconduct, the UN now not only informs the country concerned, but also invites it to investigate the incident in co-operation with its own Office of Internal Oversight Services. The new arrangement was applied for the first time to alleged abuse by Sri Lankan peacekeepers in Haiti last year. Over 100 soldiers now face court-martial.

Deeming the new report “deeply disturbing”, Nick Birnback, the UN's spokesman for peacekeeping, said it was impossible to ensure “zero incidents” in such a big organisation. “What we can do is to get across a message of zero tolerance, which for us means zero complacency when credible allegations are raised, and zero impunity when we find that there has been malfeasance,” he said. That would indeed be a useful start.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

International: Corporal punishment - Spare the rod, say some

In rich countries at least, parents and teachers are steadily losing the right to discipline children by force

“AS PART of their daily lives, children across Europe and the world continue to be spanked, slapped, hit, smacked, shaken, kicked, pinched, punched, caned, flogged, belted, beaten and battered in the name of discipline, mainly by adults whom they depend on.” But in some places, it happens less than before, and there is a chance to stop it altogether.

That is how the Council of Europe, a 47-country body that is supposed to promote civil liberties from Dublin to Vladivostok, explains its campaign to abolish physical punishment—to be launched in Croatia in mid-June with a flurry of debates, puppet shows, television spots, pamphlets in many languages and stirring calls to “raise your hand against smacking”.

As is often the case with such worthy efforts, the council's rhetoric seems torn between stressing the horrors of the present day and promising that things can easily improve if everybody tries a bit harder. And in a world where children face such horrors as forced labour, sex trafficking and military conscription, devoting energy to outlawing parental smacks may strike some people as the wrong emphasis. But a consensus against hitting children is clearly gathering momentum in the developed, law-governed parts of the world. Also growing is the belief that a light parental cuff and serious forms of child abuse are points, albeit quite far apart, on the same spectrum. Some parents may still insist that their right to dissuade a toddler from doing very dangerous things is also worth protecting; but they are losing the argument.

Only 23 countries (18 of them European) have banned corporal punishment completely. But there are 106—including many places where it was common only a generation ago—which have put a stop to corporal punishment in schools.

Countries where teachers still use force include the United States, where a Supreme Court ruling in 1977 (concerning two pupils whose beatings with a wooden paddle caused medical harm) found that a constitutional ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” applied only to judicial proceedings. That left individual states to decide; in 22 of them, corporal correction in schools occurs in at least some districts.

Elizabeth Gershoff of the University of Michigan, an expert on (and opponent of) physical correction, says the practice remains common in American classrooms and homes. Most American children have been corporally punished at home by the time they reach adolescence, and in a recent year, nearly 300,000 were physically punished at school.

In Europe, by contrast, smacking has nearly vanished from schools (even in Britain and Ireland, where it was rife) and the movement to stop parents and other adults hitting children is gaining ground. In 1979 Sweden became the first country to outlaw all violence by adults on children. It was controversial at the time, but after a two-year drive to publicise the law and the thinking behind it, which included putting advice on milk cartons, smacking itself, and belief in its value, declined fast.

Just over a year ago New Zealand became the first English-speaking country to ban smacking. A lobby group, Family First, is agitating to reverse that change, saying at least half the population supports the right to smack. But few people expect the ban to be overturned. The police were reassured when they won the right to apply the law with discretion, and there have been no silly prosecutions. Some of New Zealand's pro-smackers lost support because their religious rhetoric—talk of loving corrections, followed by prayers—sounded weird.


In recent years, several European countries (Greece and Portugal, for example) have quietly abolished parental smacking after a Swiss-based lobby group challenged them for being in breach of the European social charter, a Council of Europe treaty. Three Latin American states (Chile, Uruguay and Venezuela) joined the non-smackers last year. Although nobody expects corporal punishment to vanish soon from traditional homes in Africa or the Middle East, the United States could soon stand out in the Americas, and among rich countries, as a refuge for the spanker.

Indeed, it is the only country, along with Somalia, which has failed to ratify a United Nations convention on children's rights, which since 1990 has protected children from “all forms of physical or mental violence”. American officials helped draft the document, but it faces stiff opposition in some quarters of the United States.

Some Americans regret this. In a paper last year, Ms Gershoff and Susan Bitensky, of Michigan State University, said their country should bow to the combined pressure of a growing world consensus against smacking and scholarly evidence that it is useless or harmful. Summarising scores of studies, they conclude that smacking fails in one of its main aims: to make a child see that some things are wrong, and change its long-term behaviour.

Lots of studies, however, find a correlation between corporal punishment and aggressive, delinquent behaviour. It is hard to prove that the smacks cause the behaviour, rather than vice versa, but Ms Gershoff insists that by rigorously combing the data, one can show that parents are most to blame for this vicious circle.

Other scholars, such as Robert Larzelere of Oklahoma State University, defend the role of smacking in disciplining younger children, though he agrees that it is counter-productive for older ones.

Still, for countries wanting a halfway house, defining the permissible is tricky. In Britain parents can strike, not bruise; in Canada children aged 2-12 can be struck, but not with objects or on the head: “minor corrective force of a transitory and trifling nature” is allowed. And regardless of the law, social changes seem to be making parents in rich countries cautious about smacking. Many Americans who oppose a ban on corporal punishment say they don't consider the practice desirable.

But diehard American spankers may take comfort from defying the latest piece of Utopian dottiness from the UN: a campaign to end the corporal punishment of children, all over the world, by 2009. Whatever the merits of a ban on smacking, this wildly unrealistic goal is hardly the top priority for an organisation that has failed to crack down on far worse forms of abuse by its own blue-helmeted soldiers.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Economics focus: The Doha dilemma

Does freer farm trade help poor people?

THE global food crisis has shone a harsh spotlight on the consequences of government meddling in agriculture. Poor people go hungry, in part, because Americans pay their farmers to divert crops from food to fuel. But in at least two areas, the crisis has emboldened those who are sceptical of free markets in food.

The first is “food security”. Politicians in rich and poor countries have seized on recent price spikes as proof that free farm trade is a risky business and self-sufficiency a worthy goal. The second area concerns the poor. For years reformers have advocated freer trade on the grounds that market distortions, particularly the rich world's subsidies, depress prices and hurt rural areas in poor countries, where three-quarters of the world's indigent live. The Doha round of trade talks is dubbed the “development round” in large part because of its focus on farms. But now high food prices are being blamed for hurting the poor (the topic of a big United Nations summit in Rome starting on June 3rd).

The argument for self-sufficiency is easiest to counter. Anyone who believes autarky is the route to food security should look at starving North Korea. In world markets trade barriers, not the lack of them, have exacerbated the mess. The commodities that have seen the biggest price spikes are those which tend to be traded least. Only 6% of global rice production, for instance, flows across borders. Unilateral export restrictions, such as those imposed by Vietnam and India, have made matters worse. Global supply is disrupted and domestic farmers discouraged from producing more. The route to deeper, less volatile markets lies through freer trade and fewer distortions. The notion that free trade precludes food security is plainly wrong-headed.

The links between trade, food prices and poverty reduction are more subtle. Different types of reform have diverse effects on prices. When countries cut their tariffs on farm goods, their consumers pay lower prices. In contrast, when farm subsidies are slashed, world food prices rise. The lavishness of farm subsidies means that the net effect of fully freeing trade would be to raise prices, by an average of 5.5% for primary farm products and 1.3% for processed goods, according to the World Bank.

These effects are still much smaller than recent food-price spikes, but would they, on balance, help or hurt the poor? In crude terms, food-exporting countries gain in the short term whereas net importers lose. Farmers are better off; those who buy their food fare worse. Although most of the world's poor live in rural areas, they are not, by and large, net food sellers. A forthcoming study* of nine poor countries by M. Ataman Aksoy and Aylin Isik-Dikmelik, two economists at the World Bank, shows that even in very rural countries, such as Bangladesh and Zambia, only one-fifth of households sell more food than they buy. That suggests the losers may outnumber winners.

But things are not so simple. The authors point out that net food buyers tend to be richer than net sellers, so high food prices, on average, transfer income from richer to poorer households. And prices are not the only route through which poverty is affected. Higher farm income boosts demand for rural labour, increasing wages for landless peasants and others who buy rather than grow their food. Several studies show this income effect can outweigh the initial price effect. Finally, the farm sector itself can grow. Decades of underinvestment in agriculture have left many poor countries reliant on imports: over time that can change.

The World Bank has often argued that the balance of all these factors is likely to be positive. Although freer farm trade—and higher prices—may raise poverty rates in some countries, it will reduce them in more. One much-cited piece of evidence is a study by Thomas Hertel, Roman Keeney, Maros Ivanic and Alan Winters. This analysis simulated the effect of getting rid of all subsidies and barriers on global prices and trade volumes. It then mapped these results on to detailed household statistics in 15 countries, which between them covered 1 billion people. Fully free trade in farm goods would reduce poverty in 13 countries while raising it in two.


But lately the bank seems to be taking a different line. Robert Zoellick, the bank's president, claims that the food-price crisis will throw 100m people below the poverty line, undoing seven years of progress. His figure comes from extrapolating the results of a different study** by Mr Ivanic and Will Martin, another World Bank economist. This study analyses the effects of more expensive staple foods on poverty by examining household surveys in nine countries. In seven cases, higher food prices meant more poverty. (Dani Rodrik, a blogging Harvard economist, was one of the first to highlight the tension between these studies.)

In fact, the bank's results are not as contradictory as they seem. The two studies are based on different sets of countries: only Peru, Zambia and Vietnam appear in both. And the gloomy analysis measures only the effect of pricier staple foods, whereas the other examines freer trade in all farm goods. Such trade brings broader benefits: even if higher prices for staples exacerbate poverty in some countries, at least in the short term, the effect may be outweighed by increased demand for other farm exports, such as processed goods, as rich countries cut tariffs.

These subtleties suggest two conclusions. First, the bank, and others, should beware sweeping generalisations about the impact of food prices on the poor. Second, the nature of trade reform matters. Removing rich-country subsidies on staple goods, the focus of much debate in the Doha round, may be less useful in the fight against poverty than cutting tariffs would be. The food-price crisis has not hurt the case for freer farm trade. But it has shown how important it is to get it right.


*“Are Low Food Prices Pro-Poor? Net Food Buyers and Sellers in Low Income Countries” by M. Ataman Aksoy and Aylin Isik-Dikmelik. World Bank (forthcoming)

†“Distributional Effects of WTO agricultural reforms in rich and poor countries” by Thomas Hertel, Roman Keeney, Maros Ivanic and Alan Winters. Economic Policy, April 2007

**“Implications of Higher Global Food Prices for Poverty in Low-Income Countries” by Maros Ivanic and Will Martin. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 4594, April 2008

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Briefing: Energy - Double, double, oil and trouble

Is it “peak oil” or a speculative bubble? Neither, really

AFTER oil hit its recent record of $135 a barrel, consumers and politicians started to lash out in every direction. Fishermen in France have been blockading ports and pouring oil on the roads in protest. British lorry drivers have paraded coffins through London as a token of the imminent demise of the haulage industry. In response, Gordon Brown, Britain's prime minister, is badgering oil bosses to increase production from the North Sea, while Nicolas Sarkozy, the president of France, wants the European Union to suspend taxes on fuel.

In America, too, politicians are haranguing oil bosses and calling for tax cuts. Congress has approved a bill to prevent the government from adding to America's strategic stocks of oil, and is contemplating another to enable American prosecutors to sue the governments of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) for market manipulation.

But the most popular scapegoats are “speculators” of the more traditional sort. OPEC itself routinely blames them for high prices. The government of India is so sure that speculation makes commodities dearer that it has banned the trading of futures contracts for some of them (although not oil). Germany's Social Democratic Party proposes an international ban on borrowing to buy oil futures, on the same grounds. Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate's Homeland Security Committee, is also mulling regulation of some sort, having concluded that “speculators are responsible for a big part of the commodity price increases”. The assumption underlying such ideas is that a bubble is forming, and that if it were popped, the price of oil would be much lower.

Others assume the reverse: that the price is bound to keep rising indefinitely, since supplies of oil are running short. The majority of the world's crude, according to believers in “peak oil”, has been discovered and is already being exploited. At any rate, the size of new fields is diminishing. So production will soon reach a pinnacle, if it has not done so already, and then quickly decline, no matter what governments do.

As different as these theories are, they share a conviction that something has gone badly wrong with the market for oil. High prices are seen as proof of some sort of breakdown. Yet the evidence suggests that, to the contrary, the rising price is beginning to curb demand and increase supply, just as the textbooks say it should.


Those who see speculators as the culprits point to the emergence of oil and other commodities as a popular asset class, alongside stocks, bonds and property. Ever more investors are piling into the oil markets, the argument runs, pushing up the price as they do so. The number of transactions involving oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the biggest market for oil, has almost tripled since 2004. That neatly mirrors a tripling of the price of oil over the same period.

But Jeffrey Harris, the chief economist of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which regulates NYMEX and other American commodities exchanges, does not see any evidence that the growth of speculation in oil has caused the price to rise. Rising prices, after all, might have been stimulating the growing investment, rather than the other way around. There is no clear correlation between increased speculation and higher prices in commodities markets in general. Despite a continuing flow of investment in nickel, for example, its price has fallen by half over the past year.

By the same token, the prices of several commodities that are not traded on any exchange, and are therefore much harder for speculators to invest in, have risen even faster than that of oil. Deutsche Bank calculates that cadmium, a rare metal, has appreciated twice as much as oil since 2001, for example, and the price of rice has risen fractionally more.

Investment can flood into the oil market without driving up prices because speculators are not buying any actual crude. Instead, they buy contracts for future delivery. When those contracts mature, they either settle them with a cash payment or sell them on to genuine consumers. Either way, no oil is hoarded or somehow kept off the market. The contracts are really a bet about which way the price will go and the number of bets does not affect the amount of oil available. As Mr Harris puts it, there is no limit to the number of “paper barrels” that can be bought and sold.

That makes it harder for a bubble to develop in oil than in the shares of internet firms, say, or in housing, where the supply of the asset is finite. Ultimately, says David Kirsch of PFC Energy, a consultancy, there is only one type of customer for crude: refineries. If speculators on the futures markets get carried away, pushing prices so high that refineries run at a loss, they will simply shut down, causing the price to fall again. Moreover, speculators do not always assume that prices will rise. As recently as last year, the speculative bears on NYMEX outweighed the bulls.

There is, admittedly, a growing category of inherently bullish investment funds that seek to track commodity-price indices, in which oil is usually the biggest component. Politicians have begun to denounce these “index funds”, since they make money for their investors only if prices rise. According to Mr Lieberman, they have grown in value from $13 billion to $260 billion over the past five years. This surge of investors betting on rising prices, many observers contend, has become a self-fulfilling prophecy, helping to push prices ever higher and thus attract yet more investment.

But Bob Greer, of PIMCO, an asset-management firm, argues that even index funds make unlikely suspects. For one thing, they too invest in futures, rather than in physical supplies of oil. So every month, they must trade contracts that are about to fall due for ones that will not mature for several months. That makes them big sellers of oil for prompt delivery.

What is more, their growth is not as impressive as it first appears. Paul Horsnell of Barclays Capital, an investment bank, puts the total value of index funds and other similar investments at $225 billion. That is less than half the market capitalisation of Exxon Mobil, he points out, and a tiny fraction of the $50 trillion-odd of transactions in the oil markets each year. Although index funds have grown quickly, that growth stems in large part from the rise in value of the futures they hold, rather than from fresh investment flows. He estimates that index funds swelled by $13 billion in the first quarter of this year, for example, of which all but $2 billion derives from the rise in commodity prices.


Mr Harris of the CFTC, for one, believes that the oil price is still a function of supply and demand. For the past few years, the world's production capacity has grown only sluggishly. Meanwhile, demand, especially from the developing world, has been growing faster. So there is hardly any slack in the system. Only Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are thought to be able to increase their output from today's levels, and even then, there are doubts, since Saudi Arabia, in particular, is secretive about the state of its oil industry.

That leaves the oil market at the mercy of even small disruptions to supply. Prices tend to jump each time militants sabotage an oil pipeline in Nigeria, bad weather threatens production in the Gulf of Mexico, or political clouds gather over the Persian Gulf.

The problem is exacerbated by a growing mismatch between the type of oil being produced and the refineries that must process it. The most common benchmark prices, including the one used in this article, refer to “light” crude, the least viscous sort, which produces the most petrol and diesel when refined. “Heavy” oil, by contrast, yields more fuel oil, which is used mainly for heating.

At the moment, diesel is in short supply and there is a glut of fuel oil. That makes processing heavy oil unprofitable for some refineries, since the gains from diesel are outweighed by losses on fuel oil. As refineries turn instead to lighter grades, it pushes their prices yet higher. The discount on heavier crudes has risen to record levels. But even then, points out Ed Morse, of Lehman Brothers, another investment bank, Iran is having trouble selling the stuff. It is storing huge quantities of unsold oil on tankers moored off its coast.

Presumably, Iran and other heavy-oil producers will eventually be obliged to drop prices far enough to make processing the stuff worth refiners' while. In the longer run, more refineries will invest in the equipment needed to crack more diesel out of heavy oil. Both steps will, in effect, increase the world's oil supply, and so help to ease prices.

But improving an existing refinery or building a new one is a slow and capital-intensive business. Firms tend to be very conservative in their investments, since refineries have decades-long life-spans, during which prices and profits can fluctuate wildly. It can also be difficult to find a site and obtain the right permits—one of the reasons why no new refineries have been built in America for over 30 years. Worse, new kit is becoming ever more expensive. Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), a consultancy, calculates that capital costs for refineries and petrochemical plants have risen by 76% since 2000.

Much the same applies to the development of new oilfields. CERA reckons that the cost of developing them has risen even faster—by 110%. At the same time, oilmen remain scarred by the rapid expansion of output in the late 1970s, in response to previous spikes in prices, that led to a glut and so to a prolonged slump. Exxon Mobil claims that it still assesses the profitability of potential investments using the same assumptions about the long-term oil price as it did at the beginning of the decade, for fear that prices might tumble again. Environmental concerns are also an obstacle: America, for one, has banned oil production off most of its coastline.

Increasing nationalism on the part of oil-rich countries is adding to the difficulties. Geologists are convinced that there is still a lot of oil to be discovered in the Middle East and the former Soviet Union, but governments in both regions are reluctant to give outsiders access. Elsewhere, the most promising areas for exploration are also the most technically challenging: in deep water, or in the Arctic, or both. Although there have been big recent discoveries in such places, they will take longer to develop, and costs will be higher. The most expensive projects of all involve the extraction of oil from bitumen, shale and even coal, through elaborate processing. The potential for these is more or less unlimited, although analysts put the costs as high as $70 a barrel—more than the oil price this time last year.

Nonetheless, PFC Energy has examined projects that are already under way, and concluded that global oil production will grow by over 3m barrels a day (b/d) over the course of this year and next. In particular, it expects production outside OPEC to grow by about 500,000 b/d both years—a marked increase from the near stagnation of recent years.

Meanwhile, the high price is clearly beginning to crimp demand. The growth in global consumption last year was barely a quarter what it was in 2004 (see chart); this year, it is likely be even lower. In rich countries (or at least among the members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a rough proxy), the effect is even more pronounced. Consumption has been falling for the past two and a half years.

Poorer countries' demand for oil is still rising, albeit at a slowing pace. That is partly because their economies are growing faster, and partly because their consumers are shielded from the rising price through subsidies. But the increasing expense of such measures is forcing governments to water them down or scrap them altogether. That, in turn, should further sap consumption.


China's growing thirst for oil is often put forward as one of the main factors behind today's higher oil prices. Demand for diesel there, for example, rose by over 9% in the year to April. But Mr Morse argues that such growth might not last. The government has ordered oil firms to increase their stocks of fuel by 50% to be sure there are no embarrassing shortages during the Olympics. It is also planning to run some power plants near Beijing on diesel rather than coal, in an attempt to reduce pollution during the games. These measures are helping to boost China's demand for diesel, but the effect will be transitory.

In the short run, neither demand for nor supply of oil is very elastic. It takes time for people to replace their old guzzlers with more fuel-efficient cars, or to switch to jobs with shorter commutes, or to move closer to public transport. By the same token, it can take ten years or more to develop an oilfield after its discovery—and that does not include the time firms need to bolster their exploration units.

Gary Becker, an economist at the University of Chicago, has calculated that in the past, over periods of less than five years, oil consumption in the OECD dropped by only 2-9% when the price doubled. Likewise, oil production in countries outside OPEC grew by only 4% every time the price doubled. But over longer periods, consumption dropped by 60% and supply rose by 35%. The precise numbers may be slightly different this time round, but the pattern will be the same

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Briefing: Fuel subsidies - Crude measures

Not everybody is paying higher prices for oil

HALF of the world's population enjoys fuel subsidies. This estimate, from Morgan Stanley, implies that almost a quarter of the world's petrol is sold at less than the market price. The cheapest petrol is in Venezuela, at 5 cents per litre. That makes China's pump price of 79 cents seem expensive, but even this is a bargain compared with $1.04 in the United States and $2.35 in Germany (see chart).

As the gap has widened between soaring international prices and fixed domestic prices, so has the cost of subsidies. Indeed, budgetary strains are now forcing some governments to lift prices. On May 24th Indonesia raised fuel prices by around 30%. This was the first increase since 2005, but it still leaves petrol too cheap at 65 cents a litre. Dearer oil is likely to push up inflation from 9% to 12%. But without the increase, the government's subsidy bill was heading for an alarming 3% of GDP this year. In the past week Taiwan has also raised petrol prices by 13% and Sri Lanka has lifted them by 24%.

Malaysia has one of the biggest fuel-subsidy bills in the world, estimated at as much as 7% of GDP this year. By holding down the price of petrol, Malaysia now has the lowest inflation rate of all the 32 emerging economies tracked by The Economist. But the government is expected to allow prices to rise soon to curb its widening budget deficit.

In theory, rising crude-oil prices should reduce global demand. But if domestic prices are capped, then emerging economies will continue to guzzle oil, pushing world prices still higher. Emerging economies accounted for more than the whole increase in world oil consumption last year—because demand in the rich economies fell. But recent price increases will make little difference to global consumption unless China and India follow suit.

India's state-owned oil companies face mounting losses, as they are forced to sell fuel at fixed prices below cost. Petrol prices are actually slightly higher in India than in the United States, because Indian motorists pay much higher fuel taxes, but diesel is about 40% cheaper than in America. The oil firms are partly compensated by bonds which the government issues to them—a trick which allows the government to keep the subsidy off its books. At today's prices, the total subsidy (including the full losses of oil companies) could be as much as 2-3% of GDP this year. Morgan Stanley estimates that the government's total budget deficit (central and state governments and all off-budget items) is running at 9% of GDP in this fiscal year. The government must hold an election by May next year, so it is reluctant to raise fuel prices by much. It is thought to be considering a modest rise combined with a cut in excise duty.

In early 2008 Chinese motorists paid roughly the same for their petrol as Americans did. Whereas the pump price in America has since jumped by 33%, Chinese prices have remained fixed, swelling the losses of state-owned refiners. According to Dragonomics, a Beijing-based economic research firm, the retail price for diesel is about 40% below that in America. To cut their losses, oil firms have reduced supply, causing shortages at some petrol stations. However, China is less likely than other countries to lift prices soon. Oil subsidies are estimated at less than 1% of GDP, and its budget surplus and small public debt mean that the government can afford to keep prices down for some time. Most likely, it will delay increasing fuel prices until food-price inflation has eased.

Across the emerging world, governments fear that lifting fuel prices will hurt the poor and so trigger social unrest. Yet fuel subsidies are an inefficient way to protect the poor: they mainly benefit the richer owners of cars and air-conditioners, and favour energy- and capital-intensive industries, rather than those that create most jobs. An IMF study of five emerging economies found that the richest 20% of households received, on average, 42% of total fuel subsidies; the bottom 20% received less than 10%. That money would be better spent on health, education and infrastructure. Not only would this benefit the poor, but higher prices would also help to dampen global oil consumption, and hence the price of oil.

-

May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Special Report: EU ENLARGEMENT

If the recent entry of 12 new EU members had been delayed much longer, it might never have happened. That would have been an historic error




-
May 29th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Friday, May 23, 2008

Ungratefulness

The dictionary defines the word ungrateful as “not thankful for favors; disagreeable; thankless.” The first part of this definition stirred me when I read it. How quickly we forget the favors we have received from the Lord—His love, mercy and grace.

It’s so easy to forget! We get busy with our everyday life, our responsibilities and thousands of other things, and we forget all the benefits and blessings of the Lord. No wonder the psalmist says, “ . . . and forget not all his benefits” (Ps. 103:2, NIV). The psalmist David realized that gratefulness is an important ingredient in the life of a worshiper.

It is a very happy day in the life of the believer when we come to the realization that the Lord has given us “every good and perfect gift” (James 1:17, NIV). We can be “content” with what we have—it’s good and perfect.

Satisfied, grateful living reflects our gratitude and brings us into a dimension of peace as nothing else can. I challenge you to seek that place of contentment.

—Marcos Witt

Lord, forgive me for the times when I have allowed discontentment to rule my heart. I choose today to be thankful for all Your benefits.

Marcos Witt, A Worship-Filled Life (1998), 4.